Cultivating development

Cultivating development

“I am the driver of/for development… that the process of development is or can be made possible is through me as an individual citizen…” so should the lesson be to every individual citizen that lives within the state, from the old to the young, from the young to the old, in a continuous cycle at whose core is the will driven by the need to develop; for ultimately, the basic purpose of human existence within nature is to progress and not to stagnate: for nature even at its most basic is moving forward toward some goal and returns to its origins in a cycle we call existence.
The river begins its flow as a stream, and the stream begins as a well, and that well has its source in a trickle or a flow that itself gushes forth some aquifer deep in the rocky ground.
Thus, one can conclude that the process of development lies not in the strategies or their implementation, but the process in its origins is birthed in the minds of the individuals for whom it is intended; the team that coordinates the implementation just act as the midwives to the idea forming the contents of the strategic development plan. First, the individual citizen should be made aware of the significance of their role in the process of development.

I remember well as an undergraduate having to write a research paper on genetic engineering technology as a means of promoting development. I was fascinated but highly vexed by the term ‘genetic engineering technology’, for back then; it was still a novel idea to me, and it looked complicated due to its many terms with a lot of meanings attached to them.
The acronyms GMO, GET, and others added to the confusion, but upon getting a simple definition of what the technology entails, I realised how uncomplicated the whole process was, and in fact human society had been doing it for as long as human society had gotten the hang of domesticating crops and animals.

Mixing same species of animal or plant had been done in human society either to get new hybrid species that could withstand the demanding conditions in the climate or in the intended task (think for example, mixing donkey with horse begets the mule; a hybrid species that combines the qualities of the two and is in reality stronger than its primogenitors…in reality, the mule is more efficient than either the horse or the donkey, and it is a prime example of simple genetic modification by combination).
Back to the topic at hand, what can be done to promote the process of economic development in the current era?

First, the individual needs to know of the true meanings of economic development in terms of impacts and benefits in everyday life.
Development should not be presented as a political affair, where the people are addressed by figures that speak in acronyms and complicated jargon terms. The simple aspects of economic development should be noted as simply as their meanings are, in terms of the processes and effects relevant to the economic situation of the society of individuals they are aimed at.
Sounding educated without exactly being legible is in actual fact useless, and the nasal twang of the speaker has no impact in the process of delivering the knowledge salient to the understanding of economic development.

The knowledge that is vital to the understanding of economic development needs to be delivered in the simplest of terms; that is if development is to take off from the ideal state of strategy for transformation into real action.  It is virtually impossible to operate an unknown device without the manual, and the initial meetings between the development coordinators and the masses should lay a clear communication foundation based on simple speech, for in truth, no one can do or be engaged in what they have a vague understanding of.
The great author Walter Rodney, in his How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (published 1973) states:

Development in human society is a many-sided process. At the level of the individual, it implies increased skill and capacity, greater freedom, creativity, self-discipline, responsibility and material well-being…  However, what is indisputable is that the achievement of any of those aspects of personal development is very much tied in with the state of the society as a whole.
From earliest times, man found it convenient and necessary to come together in groups to hunt and for the sake of survival.
The relations which develop within any given social group are crucial to an understanding of the society as a whole: Freedom, responsibility, skill, etc. have real meaning only in terms of the relations of men in society.

Before the project takes off, its understanding by individual members of the community for which it is being initiated should be noted as paramount. It is only when they understand the project that they can contribute to its success and maintenance.  Self-sufficiency after the initial investment should be the main goal, not dependency on the donor, because in truth, they have done their part by sourcing the funds needed to ensure that the project takes off the ground.

Once it is walking, it is the sole responsibility of the recipients to ensure that it runs smoothly.
One has viewed development projects come, and that same one watches them go and fade into oblivion despite the excellent strategic planning papers attached at their beginning. Why the fail is often attributed to a lack in funds, equipment, staff, and other contingencies, but the solution could well lie in the minds of the people development is aimed at. Development initiative has for a long time sounded like a handout, where the donor nation is expected to pump in the funds and the local community receives them to execute the initiative.

This donor-recipient mentality still carries on, and sad to say, the truth is the funds are treated as the dinner plate of those that head the project, and this leads to their running out even before the initiative is past the crawling stage.

The funds should in the right manner be treated as mere capital, an offer to start an initiative that will give birth to other initiatives that will sustain the original project.
It should be in the mind of each individual recipient that the funds are only there as an initial push of the economic development vehicle whose starter is rusty, the rest of its journey after the initial push should be the sole responsibility of the recipient; for who buys one a car and then foots the maintenance, fuel, and collateral bill?
Maintenance… as a simple term, it is an act of sustaining life by food or providing a means of subsistence.

The other definition notes it as an activity involved in ensuring that something is in good working order.
There are three basic human needs; food, clothing, shelter, and anything other than that is an extra whose necessity depends on issues often contrary to the process of progress, and in fact, these extras are those elements that actually disturb the harmony of order, and take out of the bowl meant to provide food, clothing and shelter instead of contributing to its sustenance.
If the project is aimed at providing food for the community, the focus should be on the development of the basic agricultural infrastructures and maintaining them at a level that ensures that they are operating at competent levels in the least.

Maintenance as a process means that one ensures the systems or the components thereof are in good working order at all costs.
How the officials travel to conferences and symposiums should not be the main issue, for the main matter in this aspect is the tilling of the soil to ensure that there will be a harvest at the end of the year.

All the in-between is dependent on the commitment and the relationships of the members as individuals or as a community group.
The reality is that sacrifice is a core element to the process of development; if the individual is not willing to sacrifice some of their freedoms or their luxuries for the sake of development, then the community will never attain of the fruits of development.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having excess funds at the end of the project, but this does not mean that the community should splurge it on luxuries as year-end parties and celebrations.
School-fees, uniforms, shoes, and such other amenities are basic to the education of the younger generations who are often lacking in terms of these salient items should therefore be at the forefront.

Development implies increasing the capacity for self-sufficiency and to regulate both internal and external relationships between the individual members of the community.
Dependency leads to the community depending on the donor for everything, and this means that at the end of it all, they are still in every sense stuck in the rut of economic development they could not get out of before the economic development fund.

Dependency leads to irresponsibility, because the idea in the background is that the donor will act as a safety net, should the funds run out before the project reaches either maturity or completion.
One can safely guess that projects do not run because the parties involved on the recipient side hold the regressive notion that the donor will be there to cover for all the failures.
The mindset should be that the donor only provides the initial impetus in terms of needed capital funds, the rest of the process is the sole responsibility of the recipient; where the funds are allocated according to the needs of the individual sector, and the day-to-day management of the activities within each sector is done locally.

It should not cost the donor in terms of oversight committee salaries, for in essence, if the individuals engaged in the economic development project understand their role and see it as a personal entity that serves them in the short-term and the long-term, then there is no need for them to be monitored daily.

It is only if the funding is seen as belonging to some foreign organisation, for the benefit of a foreign community that the recipients begin to misbehave in the management of the fund.
We have had instances where political speak encourages the locals to spend the funds carelessly and then beg for more. This is inhumane, for in truth, funds are a helping hand, a mutual kind of help that offers the local recipient the opportunity to get out of the miry depths of poverty, hunger, and unemployment.
Spending them at the behest of the foolish notion that there is more from where the original fund came, means that the continent will forever be in the clutches of dependency.
Blaming history does not solve current and prevalent problems, and being careless in the use of available resources means that the economy and the development of the careless individual will stagnate and never progress to the future.

The mentality that there is more funding from where the help comes has led to the regress of this continent, not because we lack the funds, but because available financial resources are oft allocated to activities outside the central focus point of the process of economic development.  If matters of prestige take precedence over matters of economic emancipation, entire projects end up running in circles instead of taking a clear trajectory towards progress.

Whether we agree on these terms does not exactly matter, for what matters is the progress of the nation in the present moment, towards a future that will be beneficial for all.
The only time we should refer to the past is when we reflect on success, not to justify regressive habits that find politicians sneaking soiled fingers into donated funds, as if those funds were meant for their aggrandisement and not the suffering masses at which those funds are aimed.

Development seeks cultivation as a patch of land does, but first; the citizens should be taught on how to be economic development focused.
Old issues are dead and gone, development issues stare us in the face, and they seek to be solved.

Tsepiso S Mothibi

Previous The role of vision in an organisation’s success
Next Phori pledges to sort out cooperatives

About author

You might also like

Business

Boost for Royal Education Trust

MASERU – NEDBANK last Friday donated M204 000 to the Royal Education Development Trust and the Hlokomela Banana Project. The royal family will pass over M54 000 to the education

Africa

Before I wore this blanket

The polarity of the world hinges on one axis; politics, and whatever or however we may want to view the world otherwise, the fact of the matter is that there

Insight

Janusz Waluś: A case of poor judgment

By Pierre de Vos Janusz Waluś (plotting with Clive Derby Lewis) came close to sabotaging South Africa’s transition from an authoritarian regime to a democratic state. Waluś murdered SACP and