Connect with us

News

Suspended DCEO boss says he’s broke

Published

on

MASERU – SUSPENDED Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences (DCEO) boss, Attorney Mahlomola Manyokole, says his legal battles with the government have left him broke.
He told thepost this week that his legal battles have financially ruined him and he cannot afford to hire a lawyer.
He wants the government to pay his lawyer like it did when the Court of

Appeal President Justice Kananelo Mosito was fighting the government’s attempt to impeach him.
The government has however refused to help him pay the legal fees, meaning he will have to pay his lawyer when he appears before a tribunal set up to investigate his suitability to lead the DCEO.

Since last year Manyokole has been fighting the government’s efforts to remove him as DCEO boss. He has already lost a High Court case and a Court of Appeal case, which paved the way for the government to set up a tribunal of three charges to investigate his fitness to lead the anti-corruption unit.

At the same time, he faces two criminal cases. In the first case, whose pre-trial conference is scheduled for the end of September, Manyokole is accused of stealing M82 000 from the DCEO and money laundering.
The second case involves charges of abuse of office.
The two civil cases he lost cost nearly M100 000 in legal fees, an amount he says he could not afford despite that he is still getting his salary and benefits.

In the meantime, he had to find lawyers to fight the criminal cases.
On Monday, Manyokole appeared before the tribunal but the case was postponed to next Monday to give him time to prepare his defence.
He told the tribunal that apart from refusing to pay his legal fees, the government has also blocked his access to documents in his office and witnesses at the DCEO.

“I told them that I have High Court cases that have exhausted me,” he said.
Manyokole said he also asked the Prime Minister for permission to get documents that will support his case at the DCEO offices “because the employees there are not allowed to talk to me”.
After the Prime Minister failed to help him, he pleaded with the tribunal which promised to help mediate so that he gets the documents to support his defence.

“I also want some employees to be my witnesses against these charges. They said it is my right to get those,” he said.
He said some people say he should not be given the documents because this is not a criminal case “but section 12 of the constitution provides that I should get a fair trial”.
He is apprehensive that he might not get a fair trial because the government has its “limitless financial resources to hire three prominent lawyers to prosecute my case at the tribunal”.

It’s an unfair situation because I am an individual trying to defend myself against a government that has all the resources at its disposal, he said.
The list of charges includes negligence, arising from allegations that he allegedly caused a case to be dissolved, which led to a prosecutor withdrawing from the case.

“That the prosecutor withdrew was not my fault,” he told thepost.
As head of the anti-corruption body, he was responsible for ensuring proper investigation of cases before handing them over to the prosecutorial authorities, according to the charges.
Attorney Manyokole is also accused of failing to investigate a case against former Lesotho Correctional Services (LCS) boss, ’Matefo Makhalemele, over a case involving the acquisition of the LCS uniforms.

He is also accused of withdrawing a case in which former Finance Minister Dr ’Mamphono Khaketla was allegedly involved in a government fleet hire scandal that ultimately led to the fall of the Pakalitha Mosisili administration.
He is accused of taking the action without bothering to consult the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
“But this one may be coming from the DPP, I do not know about it at all,” Manyokole said.

He was also charged with failing to install systems in the investigations department at the DCEO and failing to give parliament a report of his work.
His other charge is that he unlawfully sent his secretary on leave.
Attorney Manyokole is also accused of destroying a case against the former boss of the Lesotho Communications Authority (LCA), Tšeliso ’Mokela. The case involved alleged financial mismanagement.
“They say I have ruined it by refusing to give them dockets,” he said.
Attorney Manyokole is also charged with failure to charge Teboho Tlokotsi, a director of Silverstone Fleet Solutions, a company that allegedly was awarded the government fleet supply tender fraudulently.

This charge stemmed from the DCEO’s top investigator Thabiso Thibeli’s testimony before the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
The PAC was given an indication that Attorney Manyokole did not take the case to court because it involved Likeleli Tampane, now Sports Minister, who was then a Democratic Congress backbencher.

The case, the PAC was made to believe, was a hot potato in Attorney Manyokole’s hands as it involved Finance Principal Secretary Motena Tšolo and another top official, ’Mafusi Mosamo.
They are alleged to have been part of a syndicate that received bribes ranging from M2 000 to M40 000 from people who wanted to lease their vehicles to the government.

The tribunal came after Prime Minister Moeketsi Majoro suspended Attorney Manyokole on allegations of incompetence amongst other charges.
The gazette appointing High Court Justices Teboho Moiloa, Semapo Peete, and Polo Banyane was issued earlier this year to probe his suitability to hold the DCEO top job.

They were instructed to investigate Attorney Manyokole and make recommendations to the Prime Minister as to whether or not he should be kicked out.
After completing the investigations, the tribunal was instructed to release a report with recommendations to the Prime Minister within eight weeks.

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

RFP douses fires

Published

on

MASERU – THE Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) was thrown into a fire-fighting mode this week after disgruntled party members protested over the party’s “undemocratic practices” in picking election candidates.

The members who won primary elections to stand for the party in the October 7 general elections were however blocked by the party’s leadership, torching protests by the grassroots supporters.

The group says it now wants party leader, Sam Matekane, to explain the criteria used to pick election candidates.

In defending the process, the RFP has argued that it picked the candidates on the basis of meritocracy insisting these were the best qualified candidates for the constituencies, an argument the group says lacks transparency.

Shortly after the party’s secretary general, Nthati Moorosi, announced the list of the chosen ones last week, scores of RFP members flocked the party offices demanding answers why their elected candidates were left out.

On Tuesday morning, the RFP went all out to reassure the disgruntled members that they were still valued members of the party. thepost understands that the party held a counselling session with the group.

However, a few hours later the group held a press conference in Maseru where they said even though they still supported the party all they wanted was transparency.

The disgruntled members are ’Mampho Seutloali from Stadium Area, Monohi Ralentsoe from Makhaleng, Chopho Lekhoabane from Khafung, Morakane Monate from Hlotse, Kobeli Rethabile Letlailane from Lithoteng, Thabo Moloi from Machache, Mahali Phamotse from Matlakeng and ‘Mamako Mohale-Lerata from Matelile.

The group said Matekane should explain the criteria the party used to pick candidates. Earlier the party had said the candidates would be selected based on their educational backgrounds, business successes or other social achievements in their communities.

Most of all these people Matekane left out have solid academic credentials and are successful in other sectors of society. Letlailane, reading their joint statement at the press conference, said they are demanding the document drafted by their leader while shortlisting the candidates.

“We believe that these documents are the only ones that can end the outcry that is coming from members who elected us in the constituencies,” Letlailane said.

“Members are worried that the results do not have transparency. This has caused loss of members in some constituencies,” he said, adding that some had already started re-joining parties they had defected from.

He said they wanted Matekane to give them answers so that they could go back and convince members that all is still well in the party. He said the documents would allay the fears of the people in the party.

“We aim to help our party to stop losing members on account of this,” he said.

Letlailana got 28 votes but Matekane picked Siera Letsoela who got only 12 votes. Phamotse received a stunning 96 votes but the party picked a relatively unknown Kenny Ntoane who only got 10 votes.

Letlailane said the RFP should be a beacon of transparency because many people had left their parties to join it because they were not transparent.

“The people are asking the RFP to live by what it preaches.”

He stated that most of the candidates who won primary elections but were not chosen do not want to defect together with the people in the constituencies who have started defecting.

“We aim to work hard to build this party, to get things right so that people do not leave,” he said.

He said their other aim is to prove to the nation and the people that the results were transparent. Dr Phamotse said by asking for the criteria “the angry people will understand and stop defecting”.

“We are helping by asking for accountability as there are some constituencies that have also launched similar complaints,” she said.

She said there are 30 aggrieved candidates who won primaries but were not picked to stand in their constituencies.

“They are not happy and we do not want them to leave,” she said.

Dr Phamotse said what makes matters worse is that members do not have the party constitution and they do not know if they have any legal basis to complain. The people, she said, base their decisions on democracy as they know it.

“We are representing others who are also not happy, especially those who won the primary elections.”

The Stadium Area primary election winner, ’Mampho Seutloali, said the candidates have huge supporters behind them.

“They are expecting to know what will be done as they voted for people and the party chose otherwise,” Seutloali said.

She stated that they had been negotiating with members not to defect.

“We are telling our people that the RFP is still powerful,” she said.

Matelile’s Mohale-Lerata said they signed a document to be members, therefore, they have a right to speak on matters affecting the RFP.

“But the constitution has not yet reached our constituencies,” Mohale-Lerata said.

A day earlier, Qacha’s Nek constituency members stormed the party premises demanding answers over the party’s undemocratic selection of candidates.

The members who had traveled from Qacha’s Nek to seek answers were not allowed to enter the office until around 4pm when a security guard finally let four of them in.

One of their representatives, Kokolia Mosothoane, told thepost that the leader chose ’Maatang Chaka who lost the primary elections.

“We demand to know how our leader picked this nobody, who stays in Maseru and knows nothing about us,” Mosothoane said.

“We will not tolerate this,” he said.

The members left the offices without answers.

On Sunday, the party co-founder Tlohang Sekhamane defended the party’s stance at a rally in Qeme constituency. Sekhamane said change is a beautiful thing as it goes along with developments.

“Change is not delicious on some people’s palates. We must embrace change,” Sekhamane said.

Sekhamane said Matekane has pointed out who should represent which constituency and “people lash at him for that”.

“That is why Lesotho is a poor country because we do not want to do the right things,” he said.

He said Matekane is doing what he knows by changing the ways things have been done in the country in the past.

He stated that Matekane wants to work with people he trusts the most.

“We thank you for allowing him to do so,” he said.

He said members “should change their old ways”.

“Stop believing that a parliament is an employment place where people go to eat with their families.”

He urged the members not to leave when unhappy because their party is doing this for their sake and the sake of the entire country.

“Matekane should be allowed to show and lead the way, he wants new things for your sake.”

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading

News

Why Thabane case flopped

Published

on

MASERU – THE murder case against former Prime Minister Thomas Thabane and his wife, ‘Maesaiah, collapsed this week because it hinges on the testimonies of four key witnesses the prosecution could not find. thepost can reveal that those witnesses have been playing ‘hide and seek’ with the prosecution for more than two years.

The police and the prosecution have so far failed to track down those witnesses, according to sources close to the case.

The four, who are Basotho based in South Africa, are said to be reluctant to give statements to the prosecution.

“They are not clearly saying that they don’t want to testify but they are always giving excuses,” said a source involved in the investigation.

thepost understands that attempts by the police to meet some of the suspects in South Africa last week failed.

“I am told one of them said he was rushing to Lesotho for an emergency. When the police came back to Lesotho, the witness said he was already back in South Africa.”

The source said two of the witnesses are famo music gang members that have information on the people who carried out the hit on Lipolelo Thabane.

The other two know how the murder was planned. Sources told thepost that for the past three weeks the police and the prosecution have been debating on how to proceed with the case against Thabane and his wife.

“We have some good information from the other 35 witnesses but the evidence from those four is crucial to this case.”

The source said the prosecution and the police have been racing against time to get the witnesses before the Thabanes’ legal team applies for the case to be dismissed due to lack of prosecution.

“They don’t know when those witnesses will be available. It’s not like those witnesses can be simply subpoenaed to give their statements,” the source said.

“The prosecution knew that the defence was now planning to apply for acquittal on the basis that the cases had been delayed for too long and the case against ‘Maesaiah is not proceeding.”

“If the prosecution had charged Thabane it meant he had to enter a plea and the case would have to proceed. But the trouble was that the prosecution is still struggling to get the four key witnesses.”

He said the withdrawal was the prosecution’s only option.

“It’s a strategic retreat rather than surrender. The charges have not been dropped so they can still be reinstated when the witnesses are available.”

There are however fears within the prosecution and the police that those witnesses might no longer be willing to testify and could disappear off the radar.

The police, another source said, are worried that those witnesses might be intimidated or induced to refuse to cooperate with the prosecution.

Two of ‘Maesaiah’s co-accused have died.

Staff Reporter

Continue Reading

News

Molibeli in new bid to hold on to post

Published

on

MASERU – COMMISSIONER of Police Holomo Molibeli says Prime Minister Moeketsi Majoro no longer has the power nor mandate to advise the King to retire him. This is contained in a new application he filed in the Constitutional Court on Tuesday.

In the application, Commissioner Molibeli says the Prime Minister cannot advise the King to fire him after parliament was dissolved two weeks ago.

He argues that following the dissolution of parliament, Majoro has become a caretaker Prime Minister without powers to make any major decisions in the interim.

He said section 83 (7) of the Constitution of Lesotho says a Caretaker Prime Minister “is limited to maintaining the status quo existing before the dissolution” of the 10th Parliament.

Commissioner Molibeli pleaded with the court to order that Majoro’s advice to King Letsie III to retire him from the office “during the caretaker period be considered unconstitutional, null and void for being contrary to section 83(7) of the Constitution”.

He added that the court should “interdict and restrain the King from acting on any advice of the Prime Minister or having the effect of advising His Majesty to require” him to retire.

In his founding affidavit, Commissioner Molibeli said that when the 10th Parliament was dissolved on July 13, the government assumed the caretaker role and with effect from July 14, “the Prime Minister became a caretaker Prime Minister presiding over the caretaker government”.

“The Prime Minister during the caretaker period is constitutionally prohibited from, among others, removing or effecting changes to key positions as the heads of securities, the judiciary, other law enforcement agencies such as Lesotho Revenue Authority and Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences,” Commissioner Molibeli said.

“As the Commissioner of Police, I am the head of and superintend the LMPS and its operations in Lesotho,” he said.

He said the 9th Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits significant changes to key positions in the government “was inspired not only by the need to express the constitutional convention to that effect but also to specifically deal with the specific incidents influenced by collation politics since 2012”.

He said these are “matters of common knowledge and which the court is entitled to take judicial notice of”.

He said during the reforms process, the constituent popular sovereignty of the people of Lesotho was expressed in the Plenary II Report.

“There should be no appointments or removals to the heads of securities (LMPS, LDF and NSS) including the Commissioner of Police in the interim,” he said.

He emphasised that as the occupier of the office of the Commissioner since 2017, he is entitled to exercise and perform the functions of that office until otherwise removed by both the constitution and the law authorities.

“I have a right to prevent illegal and unconstitutional means of removing me from that office, and therefore to approach the court for purpose,” he said.

He said his dignity, reputation and self-worth are also derived from the performance of the functions of the office of the Commissioner of Police which he is currently holding.

“I have a right to prevent my unconstitutional and illegal removal from office,” he said.

He said the unconstitutional and illegal removal from office will cause irreparable harm not only to the integrity of the constitution, maintenance of the rule of law but will effectuate constitutional injustice to him and trample upon and render illusory and worthless his non-material rights.

’Malimpho Majoro

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending