Connect with us

Business

A winning strategy

Published

on

Every leader should ensure that he draws up a strategy that moves the organisation from the doldrums to success. You need a strategy that is aligned to the organisation’s mission.

A strategy that is not aligned to the organisation’s goals and mission is just as good as having no strategy at all because it will not help in achieving the organisation’s purpose.

If an organisation has to succeed, that is meet its mission, and outperform its competition it needs to spend time crafting a winning strategy.

We live in a world that is dynamic, unstable and complex with limited resources but a myriad of problems to solve. These problems provide business opportunities that we should exploit.
However to be successful, business leaders need to focus on what exactly they intend doing and hence they need strategies to move ahead.

Advertisement

In any market that you chose to operate, if you have to be ahead of the competition you should draw up and implement a resilient strategy that is responsive to the environment by taking advantage of the opportunities and neutralising threats.

A strategy can be defined as a way of describing how you are going to get things done. It tries to broadly answer the question, “How do we get there from here?” It looks at how you intend to achieve your future aspirations.
Having a winning strategy is a result of a thorough strategic planning process. An organisation should first establish its current status so that it will identify those strengths it should exploit in taking advantage of opportunities or fighting threats or the weaknesses that it needs to deal with.

With this analysis, an organisation should then come up with a strategy that has a strategic fit with its strengths and opportunities. The strategy should take into account any existing barriers and resources especially people, money, capabilities and competencies that the organisation currently has and needs.

A strategy should maintain internal consistency with all the policies a company has established and also the goals it is pursuing.

A family-owned business cannot pursue rapid expansion and at the same time hope to retain exclusive family control of the organisation if it has to raise additional financing from other investors to fund the expansion. It has to relinquish some control.

Advertisement

It’s therefore very important that an organisation has to reconcile the two conflicting strategies. A strategy that is inconsistent with company policies will affect future decision making.

A company operates in an environment in which it interacts with suppliers, investors, customers, the government and society. A test of whether its strategy is good is whether the chosen policies of the organisation are consistent with the environment.

Do the policies that have been adopted in implementing the strategy really make sense with respect to what is going on outside.

How are the policies relevant to the current environment and how are they relevant with respect to the changing environment. This external consistency with the environment will ensure the future survival of the business.
The other test for a good strategy is whether the proposed strategy is appropriate for the available resources.

Resources in this case mean those things that a company has and that help it to achieve its corporate objectives.
Resources like money, brand, competence, capabilities and facilities. With its resources, a company is able to respond to any impending threats in the environment or it can exploit available opportunities.

Advertisement

In other words, resources help the company seize opportunities or counter threats. Resources are critical for strategic purposes because they can be factors that might limit the achievement of corporate goals or they could actually be exploited in achieving the vision of the organisation.

For instance, if you have cash you could use it in acquiring other businesses but lack of it can limit your acquisition drive.

Money is a very critical resource because it provides flexibility in responding to events as they arise. Competence is also very important in organisations because organisations survive or do better than the competition because they are good at doing those things which are necessary to keep them ahead of the pack. It is therefore very important for an organisation to align its strategy to its competences.

Adopting a certain strategy involves taking risks. The risk will be that you might not have adequate resources.
It’s important that your organisation should not run out of one of the resources before achieving its goal. So each company must decide how much risk it wants to live with.

One needs to evaluate the degree of risk inherent in a strategy by looking at the probability of getting certain returns after implementing certain strategies.

Advertisement

In assessing the risk emanating from a strategy you need to look at the amount of resources committed to the strategy, the length of the time to which resources are committed and the proportion of resources committed to a single venture or strategy.

If the amount of resources committed are a lot, and the time is long and the proportion of resources committed to one strategy are high, then the degree of risk involved is very high. Such a strategy is not likely to succeed. It’s very risky.

Strategies should have an appropriate time horizon in which they should be implemented. A viable strategy should therefore reveal what goals are to be accomplished and when they are to be achieved. Strategies and goals are time-based.

A launch of a new product is of significant strategic importance only if it’s going to be accomplished within a certain time period because a delay may deprive an organisation the success it’s was hoping to achieve.
It’s therefore very critical that a strategy has internal and environmental consistency if it is to be successful.
A good strategy should result in a company developing a competitive advantage. Renowned business consultant Kenichi Ohmae said, “What business strategy is all about – what distinguishes it from all other kinds of business planning – is, in a word, competitive advantage.

Without competitors there would be no need for strategy, for the sole purpose of strategic planning is to enable the company to gain, as efficiently as possible, a sustainable edge over its competitors.”

Advertisement

l Stewart Jakarasi is a business and financial strategist and a lecturer in business strategy, advanced performance management and entrepreneurship.

He is the Managing Consultant of Shekina Consulting (Pty) Ltd and provides advisory and guidance on leadership, strategy and execution, corporate governance, preparation of business plans, tender documents and on how to build and sustain high-performing organisations.

For assistance in implementing some of the concepts discussed in these articles please contact him on the following contacts: sjakarasi@gmail.com, call on +266 58881062 or WhatsApp +266 62110062 .

Advertisement
Advertisement

Business

Take a Break from Summer

Published

on

Press release for KFC Lesotho

Date: Monday, 16 December 2024

 

Summer, what a wonderful time of year…

Advertisement

When influencing gets too much

When the news cycle gets too much

When the endless queues get too much

When the shopping chaos gets too much

When the unavailable transport gets too much

Advertisement

When the holiday work shifts get too much

When the lawn mowing gets too much

When the loud music gets too much

When the traffic gets too much

When the relentless schedule gets too much

Advertisement

When the heatwaves get too much

When the weather warnings get too much

When the suntan lines get too much

When the ever-growing laundry pile gets too much

When the festivities get too much

Advertisement

When the 2025 university applications get too much

When the guests overstaying their welcome gets too much

When the social media mayhem gets too much

When the out of sync traffic lights get too much

When the New Year resolutions get too much

Advertisement

When the travel expenses get too much

When reapplying sunscreen gets too much

When the packing and unpacking gets too much

When the photo-taking gets too much

When the flies get too much

Advertisement

When the pool maintenance gets too much

When the fully booked airlines get too much

When the mosquito bites get too much

When the fishing trips get too much

When the baking gets too much

Advertisement

When the road trip stops get too much

When the sand in the car gets too much

When the picnic ants get too much

When the papa and morogo get too much

When the braai smoke gets too much

Advertisement

When the television shows get too much

When the homemade cooking gets too much

When the hot car seats get too much

When the outdoor markets get too much

When the air-conditioning bills get too much

Advertisement

When the nature hikes get too much

When the garden-watering gets too much

When the hot sidewalks get too much

When the bike rides get too much

When the late nights get too much

Advertisement

When the impromptu trips get too much

When the 4×4 rides get too much

When the golf games get too much

When the ice cube trays get too much

When the late-night crickets get too much

Advertisement

When the entertaining gets too much

When the bumpy boat rides get too much

When the paddleboarding gets too much

When the public pool crowds get too much

When the lack of parking gets too much

Advertisement

When the summer internships get too much

When all you need is a breather

 

You have made it to the end. Take a break from summer with KFC Lesotho on Saturday, 21 December, a day to pause, refresh, and savour the start of holiday mode. Swing by KFC for a taste of summer and officially step into the holidays, recharged and ready. See you there!

 

Advertisement

Discover KFC’s Summer Delights!

KFC Summer Twisters: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVlAX00WROU

KFC Summer Krushers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpCn-tFYrls

KFC Summer Buckets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbiOjRR58UA

 

Advertisement

 

End.

 

About KFC Africa

KFC has been in South Africa for over 53 years and has more than 1,300 stores across the country. The first KFC restaurant in South Africa opened in 1971 in Orange Grove, Johannesburg. KFC is the leading quick-service restaurant brand in South Africa with just under a third of market share, according to Brand Image Tracker. KFC serves more than 20 million customers a month and we work hard to ensure that no matter which of our restaurants they walk into, they will get that distinctive KFC flavour and have a great experience. KFC’s Original Recipe® Chicken was first made by Colonel Harland Sanders in 1940 when he perfected his secret recipe of 11 herbs and spices at his restaurant in Kentucky. Today, KFC is the world’s most popular chicken restaurant, still preparing our chicken with the Colonel’s secret recipe to his exact standards. Every KFC restaurant follows the same global processes and procedures to ensure that our customers get great-tasting food, every time.

Advertisement

 

KFC Lesotho socials:

Instagram – @kfclesotho – https://www.instagram.com/kfclesotho/

Facebook – KFC Lesotho – https://www.facebook.com/LesothoKFC

X – @KFC_Lesotho – https://x.com/KFC_Lesotho

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Demystifying death benefit nomination

Published

on

I recently attended a trustee training session, and it sparked a thousand of opinions and emotions to fellow trustees and principal officers.

It is remarkable how people approach their pension funds with a blend of care and chaos — carefully watching contributions grow but leaving the aftermath of their departure to luck and a roomful of trustees.

With the Pension Fund Act (PFA) 2024 in place, requiring members to fill out and update death benefit nomination forms annually, one would think the process is foolproof.

Yet, we find ourselves navigating the maze of member reluctance and the emotional minefield that comes with deciding who gets what.

Advertisement

The PFA 2024 makes an elegant appeal to order, asking pension fund members to take charge of their legacy by nominating beneficiaries.

But, instead of pens gliding over forms, there is hesitation, resistance, and in some cases, outright abstinence.

What should be a simple administrative act seems to invoke existential dread or, worse, familial politics.

 

When Nomination Feels Like Negotiation

Advertisement

 

One of the most notable trends is the discomfort married members feel at the mere suggestion of allocating 50% of their death benefit to a spouse.

For clarity, the PFA does not say they must — but logic and love might.

However, these conversations often spiral into arguments over “what ifs.”

What if the marriage does not last?

Advertisement

What if the spouse uses the money “irresponsibly”?

What if leaving an equal share to children or a secret favourite nephew makes more sense?

These “what ifs” often lead to another troubling “what if”: what if no nomination is made at all?

Emotions run high.

Sometimes, the process of completing the form turns into a reflection of unresolved family tensions, where the form itself becomes a battlefield for hypothetical posthumous power plays.

Advertisement

Trustees, meanwhile, are left to pick up the pieces, making discretionary decisions that almost always leave someone unhappy.

 

What the Law Actually Says

Let us address the elephant in the room.

The PFA does not dictate that anyone’s spouse, child, or distant cousin must receive a cent.

Advertisement

The law requires you to nominate beneficiaries but leaves the who and how much entirely up to you.

And yet, myths persist, leaving members to believe they are bound to make obligatory allocations.

This misunderstanding is not just inconvenient; it is entirely unnecessary.

The beauty of the PFA lies in its simplicity: nominate someone — anyone — so your trustees don’t have to piece together your
wishes based on tea leaves, distant

relatives, or that one time you mentioned something in passing to a colleague.

Advertisement

The Real Cost of Silence

If leaving decisions to trustees sounds romantic — think noble strangers making wise decisions — let me assure you, it’s not.

Trustees do their best with the tools they have, but without a completed nomination form, their decisions are guided by discretion rather than your explicit intentions.

And discretion, noble as it sounds, often breeds disputes.

Disgruntled beneficiaries are not just an unfortunate byproduct of silence; they are its loudest consequence.

Advertisement

Without clear instructions, your death benefits might fund lawsuits instead of legacies.

Is that truly the financial wisdom you have cultivated over a lifetime of disciplined contributions?

 

Completing the Form: The Act of Taking Control

Filling out the nomination form isn’t just compliance; it is an act of empowerment.

Advertisement

It’s the financial equivalent of saying, “I trust myself to make the best decisions for my loved ones.”

It’s an opportunity to assert control over your life’s earnings and ensure they benefit those you deem most deserving.

Let us put it plainly: by completing this form, you eliminate guesswork, prevent disputes, and protect your loved ones from unnecessary turmoil.

You also spare trustees from playing Solomon with your assets — a responsibility they never asked for but inherit when you opt for avoidance.

 

Advertisement

It is not that deep!

For all the effort we pour into overthinking, let’s consider the alternative — actually completing the form.

You’ve already made harder decisions, like choosing between investment portfolios or deciding on your retirement age.

Writing down a name or two, alongside their allocations, is, comparatively, a walk in the park.

And for those of you abstaining because “it’s complicated,” let us reflect: is it more complicated than the potential legal battles, heartache, and chaos that might follow your departure?

Advertisement

Or are we simply procrastinating because planning for death feels uncomfortably final?

 

Your Legacy, Your Way

At the heart of it all, filling out the nomination form isn’t about complying with a law or appeasing trustees.

It is about ensuring your legacy aligns with your wishes.

Advertisement

It is about giving your loved ones clarity and peace of mind when they need it most.

So, grab that pen.

Fill in that form.

It might not be the most exciting thing you do today, but it could very well be the most meaningful.

After all, if you’ve spent years building a financial future, why let your final act of planning be defined by inaction?

Advertisement

Teboho Makoetlane

Continue Reading

Business

More US funding for development projects

Published

on

MASERU-THOMAS Hines, the US Embassy’s interim head, has applauded Lesotho for passing the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC)’s scorecard, paving way for continued development funding.

The MCC is providing assistance to Lesotho to strengthen good governance, economic freedom and investments in the country, managed by the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA-Lesotho Compact II).

The MCC donated US$300 million (approximately M5.4 billion) for health and horticulture development.

For the country to qualify, it had to pass the MCC’s scorecards.

Advertisement

Hines told Prime Minister Sam Matekane on Tuesday at the State House that the good news is that Lesotho passed, although there are some other things the country has to improve.

For this year, the passing indicators are girls’ primary education completion rate, natural resource protection, land rights and access and fiscal policy.

Indicators that slipped below the pass rate are government effectiveness and freedom of information.

“Of MCC’s 76 scorecards, only 26 countries passed while 50 did not and the good news is that Lesotho once again passed the scorecard,” Hines said.

He said not only did Lesotho pass but it has also improved from passing 15 indicators last year to 17 of 20 indicators this year.

Advertisement

Hines said the accomplishment reflects Matekane and his government’s commitment to strengthening democratic governance and fostering prosperity.

“Noting the decline in control of corruption indicator, we seek avenues to do more together with Lesotho to combat corruption,” he said.

“Not only does regression in this area put Lesotho at risk of failing the scorecard we also know the corrosive impact of corruption on the economy and society.”

He said they seek to maximise the compact’s ability to ensure greater access to quality healthcare.

Matekane said the scorecards assess the government’s performance in key areas throughout the year to determine the continuing eligibility regarding MCC compact funding.

Advertisement

He said last year he urged the cabinet to build on the momentum from 15 out of 20 indicators.

“Let me take this opportunity to celebrate our sustained achievement of passing 17 out of 20 indicators which is a 10 percent increase from last year,” Matekane said.

“Specifically, I committed last year to ensure that Lesotho will submit data to support the assessment of girl’s primary education completion rate,” he said.

He said he was pleased with the progress overall and on gender parity in education and they aim to achieve better results next year.

In addition to this, he said, there is still a lot of work to be done, especially around trade policy, government effectiveness and particularly the freedom of information with a notable decline from 83 percent down to 43 percent.

Advertisement

“Our commitment to control and eliminate corruption remains steadfast. We are working tirelessly to expose corrupt activities, keeping the public sector honest and accountable,” he said.

“The commitment we have made of investing in our people has never wavered over the years and the government is also focused on improving access to quality health services to every Mosotho regardless of their background and location,” he said.

Moipone Makhoalinyane

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending