Connect with us

Jakarasi

To get a balanced assessment of the performance of your business you need to use both financial and non-financial information. However in this discussion I will concentrate on how you can use financial ratios, derived from financial information, to determine the financial health of your business or any other business, in respect of its liquidity, solvency, profitability, efficiency and investment potential.

You need to take time to assess the financial status of a business, or the business you have dealings with or one you want to buy. A business might look healthy from outside but after a financial analysis you might notice that there are serious underlying problems that you can only pick through an analysis of the financials. Certain key financial ratios give valuable insight into how an organisation is being run. Financial ratios help you to make good informed decisions. All these financial ratios are derived from the organisation’s income statement, balance sheet and cash flow.

For financial ratios to be meaningful you need to compare them with the budgets or with prior performance, or another organisation in the same industry sector or they have to be compared with industry averages. On their own ratios will not show anything meaningful. A point to note when comparing with other organisations is that sometimes the figures might not be very comparable because the other organisation might be using different accounting policies or the same organisation might have changed policies from one year to the other.

Advertisement

When you are comparing organisations in different countries you should also know the impact of seasonality, or different use of financial terms and the impact of different laws on comparability. If you don’t take cognisance of these issues then your ratios will give misleading information and eventually wrong decisions. You also need to be aware of any operational practices in different countries that will affect the financial information. For instance if you are analysing businesses that sell vehicles in other countries vehicles might only be registered twice a year whereas in your country it could be throughout the year. Such different operational practices will make figures meaningless unless you make adjustments to accommodate this.

Financial ratios are categorised by what they measure, namely, liquidity, solvency, profitability, efficiency and investment potential.

Liquidity represents a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations.  An organisation is considered healthy if its current assets are enough to pay its current liabilities. There are two ratios that are used to calculate the liquidity of a business, the current ratio and the acid ratio. The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets with current liabilities. If the ratio is two or more then the organisation is said to be healthy since the current assets can sufficiently meet the payments of all current liabilities if they are called.

Current assets are made up of stocks, debtors and cash whereas current liabilities are made up of trade creditors, other creditors and bank overdraft. In most cases this ratio is complemented by the acid ratio or acid test. The acid ratio excludes stocks in the current assets and so it uses current assets less stock divided by current liabilities. If the ratio is one or more than one it indicates that the business is healthy. This ratio is usually calculated together with the current ratio because sometimes the current ratio might look very good but if the current assets include a lot of stocks the business might not be that liquid to be able to meet the payments of current liabilities immediately. This is because stocks take time to convert into cash.

The other category of financial ratios is the solvency ratios. Solvency is the ability of a company to meet its long-term financial obligations including the associated interest payments and its ability to continue operations into the foreseeable future. For a business to be considered solvent, the value of its assets must be greater than the sum of its debt obligations.

Advertisement

The solvency of a business is calculated using the debt to equity ratio which shows how the business is financed, whether it’s being financed too much by debt or it’s by equity. If a business is being financed by a lot of debt then that business is referred to as highly geared. A highly geared company is good for tax purposes in a period when the business is performing well because interest payments are tax deductible.

However if the business is not performing well, that is, if it’s not profitable and it’s cash flows are stressed then it can spell doom to the business because any failure to meet debt obligations can lead to bankruptcy. Another solvency ratio is interest coverage ratio which is operating profit divided by the interest charge. This ratio shows the business’ ability to pay the interest on its debt. A higher solvency ratio indicates that the business is solvent since it can adequately cover its interest. An ailing business will not be able to cover its interest from its profit.

We will continue our discussions on financial ratios in the next article.

About the author

Stewart Jakarasi is a business & financial strategist and a lecturer in business strategy and performance management. He provides advisory and guidance on leadership, strategy and execution, preparation of business plans and on how to build and sustain high-performing organisations. For assistance in implementing some of the concepts discussed in these articles please contact him on the following contacts: sjakarasi@gmail.com or +266 58881062 or on WhatsApp +266 62110062

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Business

Take a Break from Summer

Published

on

Press release for KFC Lesotho

Date: Monday, 16 December 2024

 

Summer, what a wonderful time of year…

Advertisement

When influencing gets too much

When the news cycle gets too much

When the endless queues get too much

When the shopping chaos gets too much

When the unavailable transport gets too much

Advertisement

When the holiday work shifts get too much

When the lawn mowing gets too much

When the loud music gets too much

When the traffic gets too much

When the relentless schedule gets too much

Advertisement

When the heatwaves get too much

When the weather warnings get too much

When the suntan lines get too much

When the ever-growing laundry pile gets too much

When the festivities get too much

Advertisement

When the 2025 university applications get too much

When the guests overstaying their welcome gets too much

When the social media mayhem gets too much

When the out of sync traffic lights get too much

When the New Year resolutions get too much

Advertisement

When the travel expenses get too much

When reapplying sunscreen gets too much

When the packing and unpacking gets too much

When the photo-taking gets too much

When the flies get too much

Advertisement

When the pool maintenance gets too much

When the fully booked airlines get too much

When the mosquito bites get too much

When the fishing trips get too much

When the baking gets too much

Advertisement

When the road trip stops get too much

When the sand in the car gets too much

When the picnic ants get too much

When the papa and morogo get too much

When the braai smoke gets too much

Advertisement

When the television shows get too much

When the homemade cooking gets too much

When the hot car seats get too much

When the outdoor markets get too much

When the air-conditioning bills get too much

Advertisement

When the nature hikes get too much

When the garden-watering gets too much

When the hot sidewalks get too much

When the bike rides get too much

When the late nights get too much

Advertisement

When the impromptu trips get too much

When the 4×4 rides get too much

When the golf games get too much

When the ice cube trays get too much

When the late-night crickets get too much

Advertisement

When the entertaining gets too much

When the bumpy boat rides get too much

When the paddleboarding gets too much

When the public pool crowds get too much

When the lack of parking gets too much

Advertisement

When the summer internships get too much

When all you need is a breather

 

You have made it to the end. Take a break from summer with KFC Lesotho on Saturday, 21 December, a day to pause, refresh, and savour the start of holiday mode. Swing by KFC for a taste of summer and officially step into the holidays, recharged and ready. See you there!

 

Advertisement

Discover KFC’s Summer Delights!

KFC Summer Twisters: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVlAX00WROU

KFC Summer Krushers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpCn-tFYrls

KFC Summer Buckets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbiOjRR58UA

 

Advertisement

 

End.

 

About KFC Africa

KFC has been in South Africa for over 53 years and has more than 1,300 stores across the country. The first KFC restaurant in South Africa opened in 1971 in Orange Grove, Johannesburg. KFC is the leading quick-service restaurant brand in South Africa with just under a third of market share, according to Brand Image Tracker. KFC serves more than 20 million customers a month and we work hard to ensure that no matter which of our restaurants they walk into, they will get that distinctive KFC flavour and have a great experience. KFC’s Original Recipe® Chicken was first made by Colonel Harland Sanders in 1940 when he perfected his secret recipe of 11 herbs and spices at his restaurant in Kentucky. Today, KFC is the world’s most popular chicken restaurant, still preparing our chicken with the Colonel’s secret recipe to his exact standards. Every KFC restaurant follows the same global processes and procedures to ensure that our customers get great-tasting food, every time.

Advertisement

 

KFC Lesotho socials:

Instagram – @kfclesotho – https://www.instagram.com/kfclesotho/

Facebook – KFC Lesotho – https://www.facebook.com/LesothoKFC

X – @KFC_Lesotho – https://x.com/KFC_Lesotho

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Demystifying death benefit nomination

Published

on

I recently attended a trustee training session, and it sparked a thousand of opinions and emotions to fellow trustees and principal officers.

It is remarkable how people approach their pension funds with a blend of care and chaos — carefully watching contributions grow but leaving the aftermath of their departure to luck and a roomful of trustees.

With the Pension Fund Act (PFA) 2024 in place, requiring members to fill out and update death benefit nomination forms annually, one would think the process is foolproof.

Yet, we find ourselves navigating the maze of member reluctance and the emotional minefield that comes with deciding who gets what.

Advertisement

The PFA 2024 makes an elegant appeal to order, asking pension fund members to take charge of their legacy by nominating beneficiaries.

But, instead of pens gliding over forms, there is hesitation, resistance, and in some cases, outright abstinence.

What should be a simple administrative act seems to invoke existential dread or, worse, familial politics.

 

When Nomination Feels Like Negotiation

Advertisement

 

One of the most notable trends is the discomfort married members feel at the mere suggestion of allocating 50% of their death benefit to a spouse.

For clarity, the PFA does not say they must — but logic and love might.

However, these conversations often spiral into arguments over “what ifs.”

What if the marriage does not last?

Advertisement

What if the spouse uses the money “irresponsibly”?

What if leaving an equal share to children or a secret favourite nephew makes more sense?

These “what ifs” often lead to another troubling “what if”: what if no nomination is made at all?

Emotions run high.

Sometimes, the process of completing the form turns into a reflection of unresolved family tensions, where the form itself becomes a battlefield for hypothetical posthumous power plays.

Advertisement

Trustees, meanwhile, are left to pick up the pieces, making discretionary decisions that almost always leave someone unhappy.

 

What the Law Actually Says

Let us address the elephant in the room.

The PFA does not dictate that anyone’s spouse, child, or distant cousin must receive a cent.

Advertisement

The law requires you to nominate beneficiaries but leaves the who and how much entirely up to you.

And yet, myths persist, leaving members to believe they are bound to make obligatory allocations.

This misunderstanding is not just inconvenient; it is entirely unnecessary.

The beauty of the PFA lies in its simplicity: nominate someone — anyone — so your trustees don’t have to piece together your
wishes based on tea leaves, distant

relatives, or that one time you mentioned something in passing to a colleague.

Advertisement

The Real Cost of Silence

If leaving decisions to trustees sounds romantic — think noble strangers making wise decisions — let me assure you, it’s not.

Trustees do their best with the tools they have, but without a completed nomination form, their decisions are guided by discretion rather than your explicit intentions.

And discretion, noble as it sounds, often breeds disputes.

Disgruntled beneficiaries are not just an unfortunate byproduct of silence; they are its loudest consequence.

Advertisement

Without clear instructions, your death benefits might fund lawsuits instead of legacies.

Is that truly the financial wisdom you have cultivated over a lifetime of disciplined contributions?

 

Completing the Form: The Act of Taking Control

Filling out the nomination form isn’t just compliance; it is an act of empowerment.

Advertisement

It’s the financial equivalent of saying, “I trust myself to make the best decisions for my loved ones.”

It’s an opportunity to assert control over your life’s earnings and ensure they benefit those you deem most deserving.

Let us put it plainly: by completing this form, you eliminate guesswork, prevent disputes, and protect your loved ones from unnecessary turmoil.

You also spare trustees from playing Solomon with your assets — a responsibility they never asked for but inherit when you opt for avoidance.

 

Advertisement

It is not that deep!

For all the effort we pour into overthinking, let’s consider the alternative — actually completing the form.

You’ve already made harder decisions, like choosing between investment portfolios or deciding on your retirement age.

Writing down a name or two, alongside their allocations, is, comparatively, a walk in the park.

And for those of you abstaining because “it’s complicated,” let us reflect: is it more complicated than the potential legal battles, heartache, and chaos that might follow your departure?

Advertisement

Or are we simply procrastinating because planning for death feels uncomfortably final?

 

Your Legacy, Your Way

At the heart of it all, filling out the nomination form isn’t about complying with a law or appeasing trustees.

It is about ensuring your legacy aligns with your wishes.

Advertisement

It is about giving your loved ones clarity and peace of mind when they need it most.

So, grab that pen.

Fill in that form.

It might not be the most exciting thing you do today, but it could very well be the most meaningful.

After all, if you’ve spent years building a financial future, why let your final act of planning be defined by inaction?

Advertisement

Teboho Makoetlane

Continue Reading

Business

More US funding for development projects

Published

on

MASERU-THOMAS Hines, the US Embassy’s interim head, has applauded Lesotho for passing the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC)’s scorecard, paving way for continued development funding.

The MCC is providing assistance to Lesotho to strengthen good governance, economic freedom and investments in the country, managed by the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA-Lesotho Compact II).

The MCC donated US$300 million (approximately M5.4 billion) for health and horticulture development.

For the country to qualify, it had to pass the MCC’s scorecards.

Advertisement

Hines told Prime Minister Sam Matekane on Tuesday at the State House that the good news is that Lesotho passed, although there are some other things the country has to improve.

For this year, the passing indicators are girls’ primary education completion rate, natural resource protection, land rights and access and fiscal policy.

Indicators that slipped below the pass rate are government effectiveness and freedom of information.

“Of MCC’s 76 scorecards, only 26 countries passed while 50 did not and the good news is that Lesotho once again passed the scorecard,” Hines said.

He said not only did Lesotho pass but it has also improved from passing 15 indicators last year to 17 of 20 indicators this year.

Advertisement

Hines said the accomplishment reflects Matekane and his government’s commitment to strengthening democratic governance and fostering prosperity.

“Noting the decline in control of corruption indicator, we seek avenues to do more together with Lesotho to combat corruption,” he said.

“Not only does regression in this area put Lesotho at risk of failing the scorecard we also know the corrosive impact of corruption on the economy and society.”

He said they seek to maximise the compact’s ability to ensure greater access to quality healthcare.

Matekane said the scorecards assess the government’s performance in key areas throughout the year to determine the continuing eligibility regarding MCC compact funding.

Advertisement

He said last year he urged the cabinet to build on the momentum from 15 out of 20 indicators.

“Let me take this opportunity to celebrate our sustained achievement of passing 17 out of 20 indicators which is a 10 percent increase from last year,” Matekane said.

“Specifically, I committed last year to ensure that Lesotho will submit data to support the assessment of girl’s primary education completion rate,” he said.

He said he was pleased with the progress overall and on gender parity in education and they aim to achieve better results next year.

In addition to this, he said, there is still a lot of work to be done, especially around trade policy, government effectiveness and particularly the freedom of information with a notable decline from 83 percent down to 43 percent.

Advertisement

“Our commitment to control and eliminate corruption remains steadfast. We are working tirelessly to expose corrupt activities, keeping the public sector honest and accountable,” he said.

“The commitment we have made of investing in our people has never wavered over the years and the government is also focused on improving access to quality health services to every Mosotho regardless of their background and location,” he said.

Moipone Makhoalinyane

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending