Connect with us

Insight

Keeping it simple

Published

on

Those now famous words in my mind resound over and over, and over again each time there is a serious task at hand. The words are meant to echo long, though the brief episode of their utterance lasted less than 30 seconds: Those now famous words in my mind resound over and over, and over again each time there is a serious task at hand. The words are meant to echo long, though the brief episode of their utterance lasted less than 30 seconds:

We are all pebbles in the river of life and are bound to crash from time to time…
The past few months have been a hubbub of activity in almost every sphere of life, and funnily, most of it went by unnoticed despite the fact that its expression was glaring, and its sound a blaring ear-deafening cacophony to some and sheer bliss to others. Such is life, you cannot capture all the beautiful moments, and should therefore be content that you at least saw a snippet: there is just no way one as an individual can carry it alone, there are others to share the load with on the journey along the way of life. What counts is not the amount of weight one is carrying, but what really matters is whether one can bear it all to the end. The solution lies in understanding that every wall is usually built from one brick to the next, the wall does not just pop up complete one morning after we wake: it is in practical fact built from one brick to the next until the final brick in the last course.

The story of the mason and his fraternal order rooted in the pledge to be of mutual assistance to all and to practice brotherly love at all times is not an accident or a myth. Those who struggle in life understand well the meaning of kindness and joy, because sadness and poverty is a road well-worn by their boots and unshod feet. The poor know when to gather, how to gather, and where to gather to beat the leviathan that poverty, unemployment, and disease are to the world in modern times. It oftentimes takes a group’s efforts to see a dream turn into a reality, and sometimes (even oftentimes) it takes the whole of the will of an individual to see to it that what was envisioned finally becomes a reality that can be touched and pondered over. This means that such an effort has to follow a certain pre-planned pattern based on the commitment of all those (many or individual/s) involved in the making of the entity envisioned in the wish or the dream. A lag in the amount of commitment to the plan in any of the parties may actually mean the failure to achieve the dream, the goal, or the objective envisioned.

Part mason, part teacher, lecturer and many other things in between is the man that I have come to know, and intention always acts as the guide to the commission of each and every task that comes along. Without good intention being the guide to the action, then one is bound to fall down or back and lose on what they first set out to achieve. With good intention as the guide, every task one is handed becomes and actually begins to feel like a duty, for then the hours one puts into seeing that it bears fruit begin to lose meaning, the task having become a temple of expression and freedom rather than toil and travail. Intention sets the bar one should aim at in the pursuit of the envisioned dream or goal, and where it lacks or is of the not so virtuous type, only under the par work is the result, thus the basic or primal need for one to always keep good intentions when it comes to the execution of tasks.The fact is: a wall is built one brick to the next until the last brick in the wall, and I believe that the masons of this world are aware of this fact on the various construction sites.

Advertisement

They toil, mixing mortar and sweat, laying the brick on the line with their eye and mind, until entire suburbs are filled and city skylines are dotted with the silhouettes of sky-scrapers. What one sees in terms of the architecture of the land they come across on their daily journeys is the direct result of how those poor ‘uneducated’ boys from the homelands and the villages followed the course from one brick to the next.  It did not matter that many of the labourers on the various construction sites that built many of the cities and the suburbs that we can see had seen only a few hours in the classroom (having more serious occupations such as tending to their herds to perform), but the fact that they had intention as expressed by the foreman to follow guided them to the end of each flat-top and high-rise that they came across.

Looked down upon by the system due to their simplicity in terms of honesty and frankness, the simple labourers actually contribute a large part in the determination of the progress of this world. The plebeian class understand very little of the complexity and sophistication of the uppity classes who can only manage the pen and the order, their world is actually less worrisome because they follow the way of the good intention, which is why most of what they aim to achieve actually comes to be. Burdened with lifestyle issues, many of those folks one sees on the African continent actually fail to achieve their dreams because they fail to acknowledge that every wall is built brick by brick. There may be shortcuts in the building of a wall, but I can bet that they are not as strong as the brick and mortar or stone and mortar wall built by the masterful hands of a patient ‘uneducated’ village boy. We lose out when we forget that being simple does not in fact dictate that we should forget our sophistication.

The problem is only when we do not know how to separate the two forms of behaviour in a manner that makes them effective tools. I often liken simplicity to a clear blue day where everything is clear to see because it is in plain sight and there is enough of the sun’s light to complement its visibility. Sophistication is similar to a cloudy day in autumn where one is not sure whether there will come a light drizzle or a torrential storm. In the clear day of simplicity, one knows where to go and can follow their path outlined on the land clearly, and this means they can map out their course with a clear mind on what to do on the particular day.

The uncertainty of sophistication renders one hesitant, fickle, and at all times on the edge due to the simple fact that instead of envisioning or mapping out one’s route with the faith of a clear blue sky, one ends up having to live from minute to minute. Though the more desired of the two behaviours, the latter (sophistication) often gives rise to effects in character that render the individual that adopts its patterns a figure that stands out but is seen as weird, a curio that the other members of the community within which he lives ponder on most of the time. The simple man however shifts seamlessly from one task to the next without much ado and interference from the other members of the community within which he lives. The simple people are not hard to define and understand, the sophisticated are always questioned.

This is due to the fact that sophistication demands that one should wake up on a quest to be the best in every little task and travail, that they should be the leader in everything that they do. The simple know that they cannot lead in everything, that sometimes they should let others take the lead because they are more experienced or gifted in terms of executing the task at hand. I often think that the African society was actually a better place in the days when Ubuntu was the guiding credo for communal living. Back then, the “I am because you are” meant that there was an automatic sharing of roles in society based on skill and not competition, on mutual understanding and not economics.

Advertisement

Each person’s role in the community was determined by their level of knowledge of a given task or entity and not how popular they were. Observed from birth by the entire community, it means that one’s role was clearly defined by the time one reached puberty, and one stuck to it until the end of one’s life, giving one ample time to build their reputation in terms of efficient execution of that which they were acknowledged for. It is a different case with sophistication where one has to deal with multiple tasks to prove a point, where affiliation carries more weight than one’s reputation and level of skill.Benjamin Franklin (the face on the American $ 100 note) a man of vast and varied talents, a writer of merit and social observer writes in his masterpiece Poor Richard states:

“But with our industry, we must likewise be steady, settled and careful, and oversee our own affairs with our own eyes, and not trust too much to others; for as Poor Richard says, I never saw an oft removed tree,Nor yet an oft removed family,That throve so well as those that settled be”
In the quest for sophistication or its copy image, many have found themselves moving from one task to the next, in search of elusive success that renders its pursuer mad trying to catch its tail. There is always the lame defence that one should always try hard to gain that which they desire at all costs, but the cost is sometimes too high because it ends up costing one their life or their family.

The boy who grows up wanting to be the magnate but who lacks the understanding that the simple chores that are handed by the parents actually hone him to be the individual that executes duties flawlessly at the end of the day ends up being a drug dealer or cash-in-transit heist specialist because he wants to be like the Trump or the Motsepe but does not know that even a carpenter can become the millionaire if the carpenter puts their mind to the task at hand. Some men have become billionaires and built their fortunes from doing tasks that other individuals frown upon. The boy (and his peers) who invented (innovated actually) the machine on which I am typing this piece actually focused on improving its functioning because he followed one task (to improve the effectiveness of computers) and stuck to it until he became the Bill Gates we now know of.The lie most of the time is that one should be the many things celebrities always claim they are on the TV and other media.

The truth is simple, one can only be one thing at a time, and fatherhood or motherhood (as is commonly mentioned and listed in the stilted celebrity interviews on the telly) is not actually a task but an obligation. There should be clear lines of demarcation between what duty and calling mean, what task and chore are. The confusion that modern sophistication brings with its multiple definitions is what actually perpetuates the confusion of who and what one exactly is with regard to their true role in society.

It is only enlightened communities that know how to help raise their young in an environment that inculcates a thorough understanding of what the child’s role shall be to render them an effective member of a future society. Such communities thrive, whilst we lag behind, boastful that we are ‘educated’ with empty bank balances, claiming to be sophisticated whilst living most of the month on borrowed money. This in my view is not sophistication but poverty posing as something it is actually not, the truly sophisticated are wealthy because they know where to plant themselves and actually strive to be the best at that one task.Henry Ford became the magnate he was because he understood the true value of letting those that are talented in their given field within his company to excel at it without interference. He was simple because he was focused on one thing:

Advertisement

the success of Ford Motor Company. We can thrive as a continent if we acknowledge that given individuals are really talented in their given professions or fields and actually give them time and space to excel in their given profession. This confusion where a cousin or nephew is doing the work of an accountant or engineer shall throw the continent deeper into the mire of poverty it is in. We should acknowledge who we are first, what we are capable of, and then to be frank and honest enough to give due respect and acknowledgement to those that truly excel in a given field that aids in the progress of the land, the country, and the continent. It is the only way: the simple way that will lead us to true progress.

By: Tšepiso S Mothibi

Advertisement

Insight

A wasted opportunity to reset

Published

on

The year 2024 is behind us now. It was a year in which we were told Basotho were 200 years old as a nation. The facts tell us differently. If we follow them, Basotho nation was 204 years old in 2024. Also, if we follow the facts, Basotho nation was established in Botha Bothe, not Thaba Bosiu.

None of this may matter very much but it must be known. Botha Bothe has been denied its rightful place as a place where the Basotho nation was formed.

Like an older man who is fond of younger girls, or an older woman who is fond of younger boys, we reduced our age mainly in order to suit the significance that has been accorded Thaba Bosiu at the expense of Basotho’s other mountain fortresses — for example, Mount Moorosi and Botha Bothe Mountain.

They say history is written by the victors, and the powerful. Until our current social order changes, what the powerful consider to be the truth will remain as it was given to us in 2024 — that, as a nation we were 200 years old in 2024, and that the Basotho nation emerged at their one and only fortress, Thaba Bosiu.

Advertisement

This story had to remain this way because too much political and financial investment has gone into Thaba Bosiu, and we cannot afford to change stories about it.

This article is not about quibbling about how old we are as a nation, and where the Basotho nation was formed. Rather the article is about what we achieved in 2004 in our celebration of 200 years of our nationhood.

Out of lack of any interest, or out of lacking any ideas, our politicians kept mum about what they would like to see the nation achieve as part of our celebrations. So, justifiably, they can tell us to bugger off, if we ask them whether they have anything to show from the 2024 celebrations. We cannot bother them about what we achieved because they never made any promises.

In November, 2024, a friend was asked at a public seminar: What lessons have we learnt about Basotho pre-colonial political leadership during our 200th anniversary celebrations?

In response, he made one of the most brilliant statements that can be made about what happened in Lesotho during 2024. He said, in 2024 all we did was, on the one hand, to be nostalgic about the good old past where political leaders (i.e. chiefs) respected their followers, communities shared what they had, and, within communities, human security was guaranteed everyone.

Advertisement

On the other hand, we continued to treat one another the way we always do: we continued to employ socio-economic systems—and to practise policies—that are responsible for socio-economic inequality in Lesotho, where many families, including children, go to bed hungry every day.

One of the things we should have done to celebrate 2024 years of our existence as a nation was to re-consider our adoption of systems and policies that leave many Basotho poor and hungry.

For having done none of this, as a nation, we remain with serious problems that need to be stated repeatedly because it seems that those in power do not get to see them in reality.

Being given just the numbers of hungry families, and being told, with satisfaction, that they are falling, will always be meaningless when you meet a hungry woman with a child on her back, and holding another by the hand—as we do in our villages—asking for food, or money to buy food.

In official statistics, she may be a single case that does not change the fact that government is succeeding in the distribution of food aid. That is not the way she may see things.

Advertisement

To her, she and her children are not part of some percentage—20%, 10%, 15%, etc.—that government may not have reached. She and her children are 100%, and more. They are not 20% hungry; they are more than 100% hungry.

Neither did the killing, the rape and abuse of children and the elderly stop in 2024, nor did we take the celebration of our nationhood as an opportunity to think about how to stop all this.

We are a deeply unequal society with very unacceptable indicators of human security. Action to address the welfare of the most vulnerable sections of society—women, children, the elderly—remains terribly inadequate.

Their lot remains poverty, hunger and fear for their lives.

In our celebrations of 200 years of our nationhood, perhaps one of the things we should have done is to commit ourselves to the formulation of a socio-economic system that secures the welfare of the most vulnerable sections of society.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

Advertisement

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

Advertisement

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

Advertisement

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

Advertisement

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

Advertisement

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Advertisement

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

Advertisement

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending