Connect with us

Insight

Own up to your past

Published

on

Out across the street from the guest house where I have been this past week, a funny scene is unfolding, two male dogs are trying to mount each other in the manner canines do when one of their female kind is in heat, bwahahaha!
I guffaw alone in the comfort of my room at the gay canine sexual encounters that kept on unfolding in front of me these past few days every time I went out for a smoke to rest and clear my head from all the laborious typing I have had to do during my short stay down here on the Western Cape coast.

Procreation is an act all creatures in nature perform, and ‘science’ says only human beings and dolphins actually do it for something other than procreation, ‘science’ states both these mammalian species actually engage in copulation for fun! This quality however, is largely unacknowledged due to religious dogma despite clear evidence of its practice as is seen in the large amount of porn one encounters on the web or on the street.

I think science lies a lot of times and I am also aware that its nerdy Darwinian perspectives are often unfounded otherwise, why would this Jack Russel and Fox terriers be so busy trying to ‘get it on’ (as in that Marvin Gaye song) everyday despite the fact that both have no capacity to procreate?
Maybe they are lonely seeing that there are no bi . . . es (female dogs . . . and I cannot type the rest of the word because of its hip-hop connotations despite its presence in every edition of the English dictionary I have come across) out here in their neighbourhood. The other reason may be that the two guys are too short and small to mount the only females available out here in their neighbourhood.

The two are left with the only option/s available for any male who wants to plant the seeds of their progeny, on each other. For that, I take my cap off to the two tiny guys working hard to get rid of the loneliness down in this neighbourhood of South Africa’s pink city.
They have acknowledged their lack and they are making up for it by loving each other, if in a sort of obtuse Brokeback Mountain kind of way. And in the middle of all this little same-sex brouhaha by two dogs the size of puppies, I am watching Billy Connoly and Judy Davis’ The Man Who Sued God! This Saturday is panning out to be a fat jol for me! Gay dogs, mad lawyers, strange musings…

Advertisement

Moments earlier, I was reading through the 2008 edition of The Faith of Barack Obama, whilst munching on strips of biltong (dried meat is quite cheap down here by the coast, it’s kind o’ sad that I am a teetotal, for the wine is even cheaper… then I’d really get bazoonked!).
I came across the name of his controversial pastor Jeremiah Wright and realised that perhaps it is right to question the way that religion has somehow managed to convert us into a religion different from our indigenous religious systems (Christianity included . . . I mean, the Black Jesus sort and not the Jewish blond-haired, blue-eyed Jesus of Nazareth type of religion used to brainwash most countries into submitting into the arms of colonialism and perpertual mental slavery) without question.

I am not being racist here, and well I am being racist by questioning why the image of God is limited only to one side of the colour spectrum when we are ‘all’ His children and the ignored side actually in ‘scientific’ Darwinian terms came before the acknowledged side.
The escapist tendency to escape answers related to religion is ‘exactly’ that which taught men to evade doing the honourable act of ‘acknowledging’ those who deserve it.

The missionary does not acknowledge the simple; that he ‘f . . . . d up’ by writing of his host as a collective (native, heathen, caffre, and such other derogatory names) and not as an individual (I have been researching these past two years and have come up with very few names of those aboriginal individuals that showed the missionaries the way… they are hardly mentioned) that accepted his ‘mysterious’ religion and sacrificed his own people’s beliefs that had been in existence since the beginning of time and sustained the ethos that maintained his people throughout the years of history.
God bears no list of favourite races, but if one were to follow the tenets of some sects of Christianity, then they would start believing that God was born in Europe and found nothing but devil worship in Africa. The representation of all that is morally and religiously ethical is given a one sided perspective where one side is cleaner than the other.

Cain is cursed to wander forever with a mark on his forehead, Shem (shame) is given blackness as a curse, Joseph is sold into slavery, and models are used to portray a white Jesus whose statues stand in almost every mission and church on a black continent that is itself limited only to the backend of every decision ‘world’ bodies take. If you think this view is wrong then tell me, what are the names of the wagon drivers when Stanley met Mutesa, when Livingstone traversed the Vic Falls, and when Arbouset, Gosselin and Casalis reached Thaba-Bosiu in 1833?

Scholars have written copious articles and voluminous dissertations on the history of European religion in Africa, I have found almost no names of the selfless individuals that ensured that the missionaries were at home in a place where writers such as Joseph Conrad had the audacity to call The Heart of Darkness.

Advertisement

Of the genocide of the Herero in the Namibia of the early 1900’s one hears very little; the victims more than less remain unacknowledged, limited only to being imprecise numbers and figures in history books. Scholars still come to this day from far-away countries to pursue some obscure theme relevant only to their interests.

The bad is talked of only as it is, a hushed wrong, and over the years the wrongs have piled up to the extent that they are either declared taboo, or are simply shoved under the carpet.  What will happen when they are brought up to the light remains to be seen or is already being seen if movements such as the ‘Rhodes Must Fall’ and others are given due attention.

I have listened to Land Reform discussions in such Southern African countries such as Zimbabwe and South Africa and wondered why the name of the true indigenous peoples is never mentioned in the discussions.  The San and the Khoi-Khoi (Die Stranlopers Jan Van Riebeck, Vasco da Gama and other explorers invaded) are actually the owners of the land who were secluded to the deserts when the now shouting masses conquered them.

Talk of land-reform, but never forget to acknowledge the original inhabitants of that land you are raving and ranting to get back from those you call stealers of the land your self-righteous being violently wrested from the aboriginal inhabitants. There are more pressing issues to discuss than fighting for land you might never get to put to good use. Unemployment, poverty and disease plague this continent, and they are rightly the issues we should be addressing instead of rambling on about something that will cause even more strife in their process.

I sit among the grandchildren of a people who faced massacre, rape, and disownment first hand. What we lost was often willingly done in the name of loot and trinkets, our forefathers being too focused on being the most dapper dude amongst their peers.
I hear talk of freedom, and I see true revolutionaries forgotten in the controversial talks and confusing contrasts are created in the process.
Just last week Afonso Dlhakama was quietly buried in his home village in Mozambique, I guess you can tell from the silence how snidely hypocritical we are. This is just the way of Africa, the way of a million critics and a thousand ignorant judges who remember only for their own convenience’s sake, that is, those who are remembered are those whose faces can be printed on t-shirts and sold for coins.

Advertisement

The 2018 April 30 to May 7 issue of Time Magazine lists the 100 most influential people and Emmerson Mnangagwa and the puny Kim Jong Un are present, I am speechless. Dictatorship and backstabbing do have a place on such international platforms as Time magazine!
The reality is that notoriety and fame mean nothing these days, the number of people that ‘follow’ one actually count far more than etiquette does.
As long as those numbers keep rolling in and are attached to one’s name, it is acknowledgement enough; a strange kind of twisted acknowledgement related to a disappearing world that has descended to the levels of the morbid governed by what the social media says.

In a talk with a young man recently, he spoke of how one should learn to conform to succeed in this current world made of ‘yes men’ states. I wish I could conform, but it goes against my ethos and my understanding of what freedom means; being able to do what I wish without infringing on the rights of others and not being forced to do what goes against the basic norms of good societal living for the sake of pleasing someone and their interests.

Being the tool of an oppressive system means that one is an oppressor too, no matter how subtle their methods of subjugation. If one claims to free the people and then starves them the next day whilst he flies in private jets and has private chefs, then such a figure is in my books the worst kind of oppressor, a smiling Judas that stabs one underhand whilst proclaiming their innocence.
It is the reason why I have for the longest time thought that political rule in any African state is actually a farce meant to serve only the interests of the ruling party and its members.

There are no common interests in terms of everything, there are only national coffers to plunder for the sake of the aggrandisement of those that can access them. Those that stood in long lines to make the vote are forgotten as soon as the poll results are released.
The same issue of Time fortunately lists South Africa’s Trevor Noah and Xi Jinping, two men I have grown to admire, the former for his frank sense of humour used to address our cross-cultural differences that make us common, and the latter for being the most pragmatic president in the history of time (look where China is if you are tempted to disagree).

For the past 50 years and more, President Xi has been watching his “Water Droplets Drilling through Rock” theory become a practice. Trevor, despite his obvious youth has through his memoir Born a Crime and appearance on The Daily Show brought the world much closer to understanding ourselves as the human race despite the many fallacies in our character and the fallouts in our history.

Advertisement

As much as the world may seem to feign ignorance and amnesia, there are individuals that shaped the events that moulded the history of the world. We are tempted by choruses of cynics and ‘experts’ to ignore certain names, but we should not for then the real truth about who contributed to the shaping of the ideologies that govern the human race will disappear, and we will all have lost a significant part of ourselves; the past that formed our present which we must never forget if we are to progress to the future

I have to acknowledge too the importance of places where the heritage of the Basotho and Southern Africa can be clearly understood such as the Morija Museum and Archives.  The curator, Stephen Gill, has proven time and again that indeed, there are people dedicated to the understanding of our cultural essence and historical heritage.

Just two years ago, my knowledge was limited only to the vague (popular) knowledge of who Morena Moshoeshoe I is, but after the trips and the discussions I had with Ntate Steve, I now possess enough knowledge to dare to go deeper than the surface and write on the lives of his ‘children’ who contributed to the history of the land of Lesotho and Southern Africa (and perhaps the world if the names Thomas Mokopu Mofolo, David Cranmer Theko Bereng and others are to be given due consideration/acknowledgement).  I cite my sources, and I acknowledge my sources to avoid being labelled a plagiarist in the future. Let us learn to acknowledge. Rightly!

By:Tšepiso S Mothibi

Advertisement
Advertisement

Insight

A wasted opportunity to reset

Published

on

The year 2024 is behind us now. It was a year in which we were told Basotho were 200 years old as a nation. The facts tell us differently. If we follow them, Basotho nation was 204 years old in 2024. Also, if we follow the facts, Basotho nation was established in Botha Bothe, not Thaba Bosiu.

None of this may matter very much but it must be known. Botha Bothe has been denied its rightful place as a place where the Basotho nation was formed.

Like an older man who is fond of younger girls, or an older woman who is fond of younger boys, we reduced our age mainly in order to suit the significance that has been accorded Thaba Bosiu at the expense of Basotho’s other mountain fortresses — for example, Mount Moorosi and Botha Bothe Mountain.

They say history is written by the victors, and the powerful. Until our current social order changes, what the powerful consider to be the truth will remain as it was given to us in 2024 — that, as a nation we were 200 years old in 2024, and that the Basotho nation emerged at their one and only fortress, Thaba Bosiu.

Advertisement

This story had to remain this way because too much political and financial investment has gone into Thaba Bosiu, and we cannot afford to change stories about it.

This article is not about quibbling about how old we are as a nation, and where the Basotho nation was formed. Rather the article is about what we achieved in 2004 in our celebration of 200 years of our nationhood.

Out of lack of any interest, or out of lacking any ideas, our politicians kept mum about what they would like to see the nation achieve as part of our celebrations. So, justifiably, they can tell us to bugger off, if we ask them whether they have anything to show from the 2024 celebrations. We cannot bother them about what we achieved because they never made any promises.

In November, 2024, a friend was asked at a public seminar: What lessons have we learnt about Basotho pre-colonial political leadership during our 200th anniversary celebrations?

In response, he made one of the most brilliant statements that can be made about what happened in Lesotho during 2024. He said, in 2024 all we did was, on the one hand, to be nostalgic about the good old past where political leaders (i.e. chiefs) respected their followers, communities shared what they had, and, within communities, human security was guaranteed everyone.

Advertisement

On the other hand, we continued to treat one another the way we always do: we continued to employ socio-economic systems—and to practise policies—that are responsible for socio-economic inequality in Lesotho, where many families, including children, go to bed hungry every day.

One of the things we should have done to celebrate 2024 years of our existence as a nation was to re-consider our adoption of systems and policies that leave many Basotho poor and hungry.

For having done none of this, as a nation, we remain with serious problems that need to be stated repeatedly because it seems that those in power do not get to see them in reality.

Being given just the numbers of hungry families, and being told, with satisfaction, that they are falling, will always be meaningless when you meet a hungry woman with a child on her back, and holding another by the hand—as we do in our villages—asking for food, or money to buy food.

In official statistics, she may be a single case that does not change the fact that government is succeeding in the distribution of food aid. That is not the way she may see things.

Advertisement

To her, she and her children are not part of some percentage—20%, 10%, 15%, etc.—that government may not have reached. She and her children are 100%, and more. They are not 20% hungry; they are more than 100% hungry.

Neither did the killing, the rape and abuse of children and the elderly stop in 2024, nor did we take the celebration of our nationhood as an opportunity to think about how to stop all this.

We are a deeply unequal society with very unacceptable indicators of human security. Action to address the welfare of the most vulnerable sections of society—women, children, the elderly—remains terribly inadequate.

Their lot remains poverty, hunger and fear for their lives.

In our celebrations of 200 years of our nationhood, perhaps one of the things we should have done is to commit ourselves to the formulation of a socio-economic system that secures the welfare of the most vulnerable sections of society.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

Advertisement

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

Advertisement

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

Advertisement

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

Advertisement

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

Advertisement

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Advertisement

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

Advertisement

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending