Connect with us

Insight

Reforming society under Moshoeshoe I’s watch

Published

on

Part 2

Continued from last week

Many of the things we say about Moshoeshoe I — his empathy and humanity, his love for peace, his wisdom, etc.,—these things are well-known. Evidence of our knowledge is the fact that, in the 1960s, Dr Jonathan, Dr Mokhehle, and King Moshoeshoe II, all sought inspiration from him, as they pondered questions of how Basotho should be ruled after independence.
The hardest question we need to ask, and try and answer, about where we are going, as a nation, is: Why do political instability, intolerance and socio-economic inequality persist when those who perpetrate them know that their conduct is against ‘the law of Moshoeshoe I’? Why do we do wrong against one another when we know it is contrary to ‘the law of Moshoeshoe I’?
I think, more than celebrating, and reminding ourselves of, what Moshoeshoe I stood for, what he would approve of, and what he would disapprove of, we need to ask ourselves why we are unable to adhere to the wisdom he left us, despite being aware of it.

For those who may say they have tried to follow principles of good government he left us, and the compassion he taught us, the question would be: What is it that has made their attempts unsuccessful? What conditions should exist in order for us to be able to live, and rule ourselves, in ways Moshoeshoe I would approve of?
It is increasingly looking like these are the questions that we need to raise and discuss, sincerely, if we are to be a compassionate society, and rule ourselves in ways that will secure Moshoeshoe I’s approval.

Advertisement

To be sure, the fact that there are no obvious signs of civil, or any other kind of, war in Lesotho, does not mean we live in the peace that Moshoeshoe I secured for us. Basotho have been ruled by force, since 1970. Rather than peace, what has been obtained in general society, is, mostly, fear, or courage, in the face of those who wield power.
Even then, we know that, to instil even more fear among us, every now-and-then the courageous ones among us are killed, and politicians send thugs, state agents, and party apparatchiks to their houses in the dead of the night to scare them into silence.

Alarmingly, this dependence on force to maintain fear — not peace — has taken money away from education to purchase weapons. It is not an exaggeration to say that, unless we change course, disaster is looming in our education, in our prospects of better politics, and in our attempts to improve Basotho’s welfare.
Be it said that, one of Moshoeshoe I’s legacies that he bequeathed us was education. In it, he saw many benefits, including the fact that, through education, his beloved Sesotho language would be preserved. Thus, on seeing his words written down and represented by letters of the alphabet, he told a missionary:

My language remains my language on paper. If the paper came from some remote corner of the Maloti, and if it arrived by itself at Thaba Bosiu, it would be recognised as a Mosotho, and we would ask it if it had been written by one of the subjects of Mokoteli.”

After the missionaries arrived here, he embarked on life-long learning, asking missionaries questions, and engaging them in debates on issues, such as on matters of ‘right and wrong’. One of his greatest joys was having Casalis read ancient European History to him, and, then, based on what he would have heard, making very profound observations about humanity. Once, in 1840, at the age of 54, he was observed spending two hours learning to spell.

It is observable that, the political system we have adopted, liberal democracy, is, to put it bluntly, a political system of the educated — or those who were socialised in it; it works best where the majority of society are educated, and it has not worked well everywhere where the majority of society are not educated.
Basotho can testify that, greatest beneficiaries of liberal democracy are those who understand it, and who, for that reason, are able to make it work for them; and we are all witnesses to the fact that, liberal democracy fails when operated by those who do not understand its philosophical moorings.

Advertisement

As all of us must be aware by now, we should not mistake liberal democracy with periodic elections. We still have a long way to cultivate liberal democracy in Lesotho, and that requires an educated society. Our politics and government today consist of a few educated politicians, some of whom understand liberal democracy full well, cheating the rest of us into voting for them periodically, to enable them to pursue self-interest. This will persist if we kill education in Lesotho, as we now seem to be doing.

I have said that the character and thoughts of Moshoeshoe I are known, and that, we would all like to live by his example. To provide part of the answer to the questions I raised — namely, why those who have ruled us have not followed Moshoeshoe I’s example — we need to go back to what Mohlomi’a Matsie taught Moshoeshoe I. Moshoeshoe I’s youthful desire to become a chief was rather brash and naked.

As he, himself, put it just before he died (and not without a tinge of regret): Ke ne ke luma borena haholo — loosely: My ambition to become a chief was excessive. This is the ambition that he presented to Mohlomi, and asked for medicine, setlhare, to create a chiefdom, such as Mohlomi’s, whose territory “was covered with men”. Mohlomi is said to have told Moshoeshoe I: Motse ha o na sehlare: sehlare ke pelo — loosely: There is no medicine that can be used in the building of a strong, well-founded community; medicine for doing so is the heart.
There is a very important lesson to be drawn from this, at this time when we are looking for a remedy, or ‘medicine’, to our recurring political crises, political and economic insecurity, poverty, and socio–economic inequality.

The evils that have taken place, and that have been perpetrated in our society, come from the hearts of men and women. Mohlomi was quite right that: unless Moshoeshoe I got his heart right, he was not going to succeed.

Only when his heart was right would his ambition be clothed with empathy and generosity. In the same vein, it is well to reform our institutions, but many of us have long thought that, it is not our institutions — the constitution, the political system, etc.—that are lacking, but it is the hearts of those who have ruled us that are not right.

Advertisement

We are all aware that we will never have a fool-proof constitution. Nobody does. Besides, those with ill-intentioned hearts will subvert even the most water-tight constitution.
We need leaders with the right hearts, who, when the constitution shows weaknesses, will remember its intentions, and use those to guide their actions. What we have had, instead, are politicians and rulers who take advantage of the ‘loopholes’ to generate crises. A ruler with a good heart will use even a bad constitution to good ends, and a ruler with an evil heart will subvert even a fool-proof constitution to achieve evil, and self-serving, ends.

l Motlatsi Thabane is a Mosotho academic based in Kwaluseni in Eswatini

Advertisement

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

Advertisement

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

Advertisement

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

Advertisement

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

Advertisement

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

Advertisement

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Advertisement

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

Advertisement

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Part One

Published

on

Attentive readers will recall that some weeks ago, I scribbled a series of pieces on elections due to be held in the UK, France, South Africa, and the USA. These elections were unusually critical for the well-being of their countries and even that of the world.

The results of the last of these elections are now with us and we are faced with the devastating news that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House.

I can hardly think of worse news to swallow or to equip the world to survive the years ahead.

The Dump, as I call him, is one of the most odious, dangerous, untrustworthy individuals currently inhabiting planet Earth. To cite a few of his demerits: he is a convicted felon; he believes climate change is a hoax; he is a sexist and a racist (one of his former military advisers has gone so far as to describe him as a fascist).

Advertisement

He is a snuggle buddy of the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and will probably discontinue aid to Ukraine as it resists invasion by Russia. Western European allies such as France, Germany and the UK are dismayed at his victory, as he holds the principles of democracy and constitutionalism in contempt.

As for Africa, well, he once described it as a “shit country,” so don’t look forward to much support from him.

Readers who spent time at the NUL will remember my dear colleague Katt Lissard who is now back home in New York. She spent some years with us as a Professor specialising in Theatre studies and was the Artistic Director of our international Winter / Summer Institute for Theatre for Development.

Many activists in the USA like Katt, who don’t see themselves as part of the political mainstream, chose to campaign for the Democrats and Kamala Harris in the hope of keeping Trump and the far right out of power. Confronted with the news of Trump’s victory, she sent an email to friends noting this was “just a brief check-in from the incomprehensible USA.”

She then explained: “We’re in shock and the early days of processing, but white supremacy, misogyny and anti-immigrant bias are alive and well and driving the boat here.” So, how do Katt and millions of decent, like-minded Americans plan to weather the storm?

Advertisement

Katt explained: “We were deeply depressed and deeply furious as it became clear that one of the worst human beings on the planet was going back to the White House, but we are still breathing and know that we will in the days ahead begin to formulate plans and strategies—and not just for heading north across the Canadian border.”

Picking up on that last point, it may well be that many decent Americans might just up and off across the border; Canada had better prepare for an avalanche of applications for residence permits.

And not just from Americans; in, for example, the American university system alone there are many many Africans employed in high positions (Professors and such-like), who must now face the fact they are living in a country whose leader despises them and who may opt to get out.

In her email written to her friends, once the news from hell had been confirmed, Katt quoted a piece by Rebecca Solnit, one of the most exciting writers at work in the USA today (readers may remember that I have previously reviewed two of her books for this newspaper, Whose Story is This? and Recollections of My Non-Existence).

Now Solnit is a feminist and at the heart of her work is a dissection of the way women have been marginalised in the USA (let’s remember that Kamala Harris, the Presidential candidate who lost to Trump, did so partly because so many American males could not bring themselves to vote for a woman.

Advertisement

I am thinking of the kind of male who invaded the White House when it was announced Trump had lost the 2020 election, bare-chested and wearing cow-horn helmets on their numbskull heads).

Solnit has this to say on our response to the Trump victory: “They want you to feel powerless and to surrender and to let them trample everything and you are not going to let them.

You are not giving up and neither am I. The fact that we cannot save everything does not mean we cannot save anything and everything we can save is worth saving.

You may need to grieve or scream or take time off, but you have a role no matter what, and right now good friends and good principles are worth gathering in.

Remember what you love. Remember what loves you. Remember in this tide of hate what love is.” And then: “A lot of us are going to resist by building solidarity and sanctuary.”

Advertisement

What is so morale-boosting about Solnit’s piece is not just her vision but also her command of language.
Her writing is so crisp and elegant. Language comes at us at its best, of course, in literature, and when I heard that the Dump was on the move back to the White House, I immediately recalled one of the most startling poems in the English language, “The Second Coming” by the Irish poet WB Yeats.

I’ll kick off with that next week.

To be concluded

Chris Dunton

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending