Connect with us

Insight

The cronyism in our politics

Published

on

Politics tend to look for scapegoats when it comes to addressing the real concerns that affect the continent. Maybe due to the fact that the voters just vote for the sake of voting and not effecting change, that is, the average voter is similar to a football club fan whose only concern is that their team should win against the archrivals at any cost, even if it means buying the referee off.

It is the style of African politics, a landscape where the poll results are followed by howls of protest at them being a rigged affair. It is not the fault of the elected that the continent is where it is these many years after ‘independence’, but it is that of the irresponsible voter who does not follow up on what they voted for.
Merely dropping the ballot paper with a mark against the favourite party’s logo does not effect change, ensuring that the candidates are reminded (constantly) of their lobby speech promises and seeing to it that they are true to their word is what really counts.

That there is an abundance of talent on the continent but little that is done to see to it that it is explored to its full potential is not the error of the politician, it is the unconcerned manner of the voter who never bothers to follow up on what was promised by the politician in parliament in the days before the ascension to the seat of power.

Being a village boy that grew up in the relative quiet and peace of the village and the hamlet, the cacophony and the blaring nature of the city life came as a shock in the first months of one’s sojourn in the different locations within the city, the stark manner with which the extremes of life present themselves in the city used to come as a shock until the soul developed a callus that acted as a shock absorber against the extreme poverty and squalor of the city, against the extreme scenes of debauchery and depravity that are part of everyday living in the city.

Advertisement

Seeing the poverty is an everyday experience, for the mentally ill are the lead citizens in the city, the street urchins (street-kids) that hang in groups sharing bottles of glue and other drugs are a common sight, the sex vendors catcall one shamelessly on each evening walk on the streets of the city, the poor women and their children rummaging through trash in search of something to sell to the scrapyard dealerships is a common sight, and the drunks and the forgotten live their lives in the various bars and shebeens.

These are scenes present in pre-independence Zimbabwe’s Marechera or a Kenyan Mwangi novel, present in a pre-independence South African Sekoto portrait: these scenes are the common sight found almost everywhere on the continent.

They never go away but stay with the masses that keep on voting only to watch their ballot fade into nothingness as the previous ones did in the regime before the one they voted into power now resident in the parliament.
How we fail to address the real issues is largely due to the fact that we use the same lame excuses as we have done repeatedly and in chorus over the years. “The previous regime spent all the state funds… so and so was corrupt… this government does not give a s*** about us… this is the reason why we suffer so much! The white man was better because he at least gave us jobs and we never starved like we do in this cruel regime!”

The voter whines and does not actually bother to introspect and spot the real problem that is in the voter being the main party to incompetence seen unfolding after the ascension of a regime into parliament. The African voter would rather starve than to tell the ‘leader’ of the errors he or she is committing.
The blind ignorance of the fact lies not in the voter not seeing the error, but it lies in the voter keeping mum about blatant abuse of power to scorn and to spite the opposition.

It is better for the follower to stick to their leader despite obvious corruption and crimes against humanness than to tell him or her to get back in line. This self-righteous attitude has seen the continent plunge further into regression, to the point where foreign aid is the only means with which the African state can survive.

Advertisement

The aid arrives only to disappear at some point, then commissions of enquiry are formed and propositions are presented as solutions to the problems found by the commissions, and the beat goes on.
One could say that the beat goes on because nothing ever changes for the better, the landscape stays the same with the caster of the ballot’s state of being staying squalid and the politician’s rising to stratospheric heights of endless splendour and luxury.

From being a simple campaigner to driving in cavalcades, the rise to stardom may be too fast, so fast that the African politician forgets the basic reason they are in parliament; to serve the needs of the masses without prejudice or concern for political colour. One cannot say that the politician is not aware of the needs of the masses, what can be said is that the uppity nature of the political class with the many perks associated with the position are what give rise to the seeming lack of concern for the needs of the masses.

There is simply too much comfort found in being a delegate in parliament, so much of it that the individual politician soon forgets the basic reason they are in parliament.
The scene could change if the politicians walked the walk with the masses on a regular basis, for then they would understand the hardship of the pavement and having to eke for livelihoods in the blistering heat of summer and the bone-chilling cold of winter.

Ensconced in the cushy comfort of the air-conditioned SUV or luxury German motor vehicle with tinted windows, the scenes outside the confines of the comfortable car become another world.
That the same people the politician sees outside on the daily safari through the concrete jungle are the ones that actually cast the ballot that put him or her in the cushy position becomes forgotten, for then they get viewed as a pastime that shall only be remembered coaxed with empty promises into casting the ballot when the next voting session comes.

Some popular figure I recently met made me aware that no one can claim to be apolitical, we only do so because of the manner in which our politics are run, that is, it is the attitude of the political class that either attracts or repels the interest of the individual citizen. With the type of noncommittal relationship between the politician and the masses after the elections, it is quite hard for anyone to pledge their commitment to political governance, after all: what purpose would such a relationship be serving?

Advertisement

Of what use is it to consider someone a plan A when they consider you a plan B? Maybe said in the lobbying speeches of the politicians that the masses are in a lot of ways the plan A of government, but the levels of poverty, unemployment, and general discontent prove the contrary view that African political governance is not actually designed to serve the interests of the masses but those of the political class and their cronies.

Cronyism in African politics is a common affair, having its roots in tribalism which in itself stems from common interest, that is, people have the natural affinity to connect with those that share similar interests and from there comes the idea of the tribe.

The political party is in itself a tribe, with slogans similar to clan poems, and the party colours being the standards which the followers wear to show their allegiance to the party (tribe). There has been a trend in most African countries where the party colour carries more weight than even the clan name, with siblings denouncing each other due to the difference in party politics affiliation.

This type of behaviour shows the real roots of political governance, and they are found in the divide and rule policies of the colonial era where people were divided on the basis of presumed differences. Those that bore a certain colour or features were either integrated or segregated on the basis of how they looked or who they were affiliated to.
This meant that those who were seen to be different were normally sectioned off to the peripheries of the system, left there to languish in squalor as the lives of those considered to be of the tribe or group saw tremendous changes for the better in their lives. This behaviour has not changed but has merely changed name.

Africa does not develop due to rampant nepotism that finds real professionals losing positions in places of work due to lack in party membership card or being non-affiliates of those that have the power to hire and to fire in industry or the civil service. The large numbers of graduates without jobs in Africa is the direct result of corruption as found in nepotism.

Advertisement

Nepotism says, “Give the job to one that you are related to and not the one related to the job…” and this results in people being put in jobs they have no interest in, and into positions which they have no knowledge of, leading to poor service delivery because the officers do not know their task and if they do, would not actually care to deliver because their position is safeguarded by their relation to Mr or Mrs So-and-So who has the clout when it comes to the hiring and the firing in the respective sector of industry or civil service.

That there is no adequate monitoring when it comes to the execution of set tasks simply because one is a relative to the human resource manager or executive means that a high level of complacency soon takes over and the duties that are directly related to serving the people are affected.

The high levels of nepotism and cronyism lie as the basic source to the problem of corruption, for then the system meant to address the concerns of the masses ends serving only those of the cliques operating within the government or the industry.

It is a fact that the average individual finds it hard to sell their family or benefactor out, and in a continent where the basic threat is “you shall starve if you don’t follow,” it becomes harder for those that see acts of corruption being committed to speak out, largely due to the fact that they benefit indirectly from them, or, that they are complicit in some way in the crimes being committed.

Funds are funnelled to offshore accounts with the help of some accountant that is a relative, or who is skimming some pishkesh (bribe) off the top, and so the cycle of corruption begins and continues to the point where someone speaks out against it.
What one feels at such points in time is that the corruption is only exposed because someone was caught with their finger in the cookie jar, otherwise it would have gone on unchecked had someone not spoken about it.

Advertisement

The speakers are hardly ever given the praise due to them because we have come to a point where corruption is an accepted affair: an act that bears many sweet nicknames despite its dangerous nature.
The poor go on living in their poverty, and the rich get richer in dubious ways but even this glaring gap is ignored, only empty speeches apparently meant to address it are ever heard.

There is something wrong if one meets a single mother with her brood of emaciated children seen rummaging through trash for empty soft-drink cans to sell to the scrapyard dealer at 4am.
There is something wrong if the laws made only serve the interests of the few at the expense of the basic interests of the masses. It is a culture Africa should learn to kill before it annihilates a continent already in the clutches of a poverty brought on by perfidious (and largely uneducated) political class who understand not the needs of the people.
The showmanship that goes on in the political arena never served anyone except the speaker and those around him or her. It is perhaps time to boycott such nonsense and uselessness as is found in such practices as voting and empty debates.

Our forefathers watched politics destroy an entire continent because they were based on colonial models: it would be naïve to think that politics can save the continent from the challenges it is facing.
What shall happen is that the politician will attend conferences in successful economies and come back with nothing because the politician is in fact illiterate.

Illiteracy does not mean that one has not been to school, what it means is that one can see good being performed around one but one learns nothing from it.
What we need are political figures with teachable spirits, the type that can really learn from their experiences and not this council of proud clowns.

Tšepiso Mothibi

Advertisement

Advertisement

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

Advertisement

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

Advertisement

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

Advertisement

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

Advertisement

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

Advertisement

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Advertisement

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

Advertisement

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Part One

Published

on

Attentive readers will recall that some weeks ago, I scribbled a series of pieces on elections due to be held in the UK, France, South Africa, and the USA. These elections were unusually critical for the well-being of their countries and even that of the world.

The results of the last of these elections are now with us and we are faced with the devastating news that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House.

I can hardly think of worse news to swallow or to equip the world to survive the years ahead.

The Dump, as I call him, is one of the most odious, dangerous, untrustworthy individuals currently inhabiting planet Earth. To cite a few of his demerits: he is a convicted felon; he believes climate change is a hoax; he is a sexist and a racist (one of his former military advisers has gone so far as to describe him as a fascist).

Advertisement

He is a snuggle buddy of the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and will probably discontinue aid to Ukraine as it resists invasion by Russia. Western European allies such as France, Germany and the UK are dismayed at his victory, as he holds the principles of democracy and constitutionalism in contempt.

As for Africa, well, he once described it as a “shit country,” so don’t look forward to much support from him.

Readers who spent time at the NUL will remember my dear colleague Katt Lissard who is now back home in New York. She spent some years with us as a Professor specialising in Theatre studies and was the Artistic Director of our international Winter / Summer Institute for Theatre for Development.

Many activists in the USA like Katt, who don’t see themselves as part of the political mainstream, chose to campaign for the Democrats and Kamala Harris in the hope of keeping Trump and the far right out of power. Confronted with the news of Trump’s victory, she sent an email to friends noting this was “just a brief check-in from the incomprehensible USA.”

She then explained: “We’re in shock and the early days of processing, but white supremacy, misogyny and anti-immigrant bias are alive and well and driving the boat here.” So, how do Katt and millions of decent, like-minded Americans plan to weather the storm?

Advertisement

Katt explained: “We were deeply depressed and deeply furious as it became clear that one of the worst human beings on the planet was going back to the White House, but we are still breathing and know that we will in the days ahead begin to formulate plans and strategies—and not just for heading north across the Canadian border.”

Picking up on that last point, it may well be that many decent Americans might just up and off across the border; Canada had better prepare for an avalanche of applications for residence permits.

And not just from Americans; in, for example, the American university system alone there are many many Africans employed in high positions (Professors and such-like), who must now face the fact they are living in a country whose leader despises them and who may opt to get out.

In her email written to her friends, once the news from hell had been confirmed, Katt quoted a piece by Rebecca Solnit, one of the most exciting writers at work in the USA today (readers may remember that I have previously reviewed two of her books for this newspaper, Whose Story is This? and Recollections of My Non-Existence).

Now Solnit is a feminist and at the heart of her work is a dissection of the way women have been marginalised in the USA (let’s remember that Kamala Harris, the Presidential candidate who lost to Trump, did so partly because so many American males could not bring themselves to vote for a woman.

Advertisement

I am thinking of the kind of male who invaded the White House when it was announced Trump had lost the 2020 election, bare-chested and wearing cow-horn helmets on their numbskull heads).

Solnit has this to say on our response to the Trump victory: “They want you to feel powerless and to surrender and to let them trample everything and you are not going to let them.

You are not giving up and neither am I. The fact that we cannot save everything does not mean we cannot save anything and everything we can save is worth saving.

You may need to grieve or scream or take time off, but you have a role no matter what, and right now good friends and good principles are worth gathering in.

Remember what you love. Remember what loves you. Remember in this tide of hate what love is.” And then: “A lot of us are going to resist by building solidarity and sanctuary.”

Advertisement

What is so morale-boosting about Solnit’s piece is not just her vision but also her command of language.
Her writing is so crisp and elegant. Language comes at us at its best, of course, in literature, and when I heard that the Dump was on the move back to the White House, I immediately recalled one of the most startling poems in the English language, “The Second Coming” by the Irish poet WB Yeats.

I’ll kick off with that next week.

To be concluded

Chris Dunton

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending