Connect with us

Insight

The interior monologue

Published

on

When you read the novels of J M Coetzee, Charles Mungoshi and others, you find them using a narrative mode or device that depicts the multitudinous thoughts and feelings which pass through the minds of their characters. These are streams of consciousness and interior monologues.

This technique of writing allows authors to provide a more intimate portrayal of their subjects. It prevents them from being confined to physical descriptions or accounts of spoken dialogue, which was a standard literary technique prior to the rise of the stream of consciousness approach.

In literature, stream of consciousness and the interior monologue are products of a movement called Modernism which started in Europe around the late nineteenth century to the twentieth century.
The terms were coined by William James. The interior monologue has varieties like reflection, flashbacks, flash forwards and poetic detours. Modernism, the mother of interior monologue was championed by writers and theorists such as Ezra Pound, Sigmund Freud and Ernst Mach.

In this period, that also included the first and second world wars, there developed a tendency to desire to break away from the past in the way art is conceived and produced.
The horrifying two wars and new technology made people question the future of humanity. Writers started to move from the notions of the Romantic era which had focused on nature and being. There was a departure from rationality and orderly presentation in telling stories. There was a clear movement towards psychological realism which promoted the inner being. To achieve that, modern literature was cast in the first person and it employed the stream of consciousness.
One of the key proponents of Modernism, the American poet and critic, Ezra Pound, was not only important for his own creative writing but for his ideas that influenced other writers and artists.

Advertisement

Ezra Pound did more than any other single figure to advance a modernist movement in English and American literature by promoting and also occasionally helping to shape the works of such writers and poets as W B Yeats, James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, Robert Frost, DH Lawrence and TS Eliot.

For example, his Make it New maxim emphasized a new kind of poetry that centered on easy choice of words and simple syntax, while focusing on very strong imagery.
Sigmund Freud’s ideas also had major influence on the arts during Modernism. He invented the concept of the subconscious dimension of the mind, explaining how the subconscious influences the way we think about thinking and reality. He emphasised on the idea of the life of the mind. He thought that thought has privilege over action.

He wrote about the primacy of the mind and that truth existed beneath the surface and that truth reveals itself through complex abstract symbols and perverted actions.
For Freud, the individual is more important than society. Confessions, meditations and dreams are repositories of deep and privileged truth and therefore art should do the following things: A) art should focus on individuals and show how the individual is in conflict with society. B) art should focus on the inner lives of individuals as they struggle to find their real selves. C) art should use symbols that are abstract and as complex as dreams. And D) art should privilege characters who achieve a deeper understanding of the self.

The above tend to be the inherent characteristics of the interior monologue.
The term was actually coined in 1890 by William James, a philosopher and psychologist and has been adopted in literature. James was the first person to spell out the idea that consciousness is a “stream” or precisely “a continuous succession of experience.” He saw the role and function of consciousness as to select what to pay attention to. His actual words are:

“Consciousness, then, does not appear to itself chopped up in bits. Such words as ‘chain’ or ‘train’ do not describe it fitly as it presents itself in the first instance. It is nothing jointed; it flows. A ‘river’ or a ‘stream’ are the metaphors by which it is most naturally described. In talking of it hereafter, let us call it the stream of thought, of consciousness, or of subjective life.” (p.526)

Advertisement

One could say James considered the critical role of this stream of consciousness to be the selector of what should be paid attention to by the mind at any given time. In addition, thought has two other characteristics. Thought tends to be personal because several different minds simultaneously entertain several different thoughts. Secondly, thought tends to be in constant change because although belonging to one person, thoughts are utterly isolated from one another.

In 2017, K. Weerasekera suggested that the stream of consciousness is also referred to even in the early writings of Buddhism where it is actually called Mind Stream or the Practice of Mindfulness. It is considered to be the state of being aware of one’s individual and subjective experience. Buddhist teachings refer to “stream of mental and material events” that include sensory experience like seeing, hearing, touching smelling and tasting. These are based on one’s previous and current experiences in the universe.

Writing in the Encyclopedia Britannica in 2007, JE Luebering indicates that the Interior monologue, in dramatic and nondramatic fiction, is a narrative technique that exhibits the thoughts passing through the minds of the protagonists. These ideas may be either loosely related impressions approaching free association or more rationally structured sequences of thought and emotion. This is in line with the idea that thought has various characteristics.
Thought tends to be personal because several different minds simultaneously entertain several different thoughts. Secondly, thought tends to be in constant change because although belonging to one person, thoughts are utterly isolated from one another.

Interior monologue may include several forms, including dramatised inner conflicts, self-analysis, and imagined dialogue with the self as in T S Eliot’s The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock. The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock is a 1917 poem by TS Eliot in which the persona is constantly very self conscious with his thoughts flowing forward, backwards and sideways, sparking various psychological associations.

Prufrock is an aged man who is very concerned with the way people may think about what he thinks is his not so appealing appearance. Meanwhile he is thinking about making a love proposal to a woman. He constantly addresses himself while he is in one spot. He imagines himself straying into various rooms where there are many women who could easily pass negative comments about him. Finally he undertakes no physical journey at all, having already travelled mentally.

Advertisement

He finally goes out to the beach and takes a restless walk, still holding mental debates within himself. It is apparent that the use of the interior monologue in this instance is to ably capture the mind of the individual who fails to come to terms with a practical reality and ends up living in his mind. In literature this tends to dramatise the neurosis of the individual in modern society.


Interior monologue may also come in the form of a direct first-person expression apparently devoid of the author’s selection and control, as in Molly Bloom’s monologue concluding James Joyce’s Ulysses of 1922, or a third-person treatment that begins with a phrase such as “he thought” or “his thoughts turned to.”
Molly Bloom is a character in Ulysses by James Joyce. She is the wife of Leopold Bloom. Molly is having an affair with Hugh Boylan. Her key interior monologue is in the final chapter of Ulysses. It is a long narrative that is free of punctuation. It carries Molly’s thoughts as she lies in bed next to her husband.

Joyce experiments with the narrative form in Ulysses, using techniques such as multiple points of view and stream of consciousness. As a result, reading this novel demands active participation on the part of the reader. The reader should be a knowledgeable person in order to read this text. It is what Bulson describes as an activity that takes the reader from the beginning to the end and back again.
Umberto Eco the Italian semiotic theorist argued that many modernist works are open and invite the reader’s collaboration in the production of meaning. These open texts are steeped in ambiguity, discontinuity, indeterminacy, plurivocal, ongoing process, movement, possibility and free interplay.

Hashemi and Hesabi in 2016, took us into the subject of narratology. They take us to one such scholar, Gerad Genett who identifies three forms of narrative. The first narrative is called zero focalisation. Here the narrator knows more than the characters. The second type of narrative is called internal focalisation. Here the view is restricted to that of the single character. The story becomes based on what only the character knows.
This is common in modern novels such as those by James Joyce and Virginia Woolf who use the technique of stream of consciousness and interior monologue to reveal a character’s thoughts.


Internal focalisation is itself divided into three. The first form is called fixed internal focalisation which allows everything to pass through one character. The second is called variable focalisation in which characters take turns to being central as in Madame Bovary. The third form is called multiple focalisation. It happens in epistolary novels where the same event maybe evoked several times according to the point of view of several letter writing characters.
R. Fowler claims that when it emerged in Doroth Richardson, Virginia Woolf and James Joyce, the stream of consciousness was a fresh weapon in the struggle against intrusive narration. By recording the actual flow of thought with its paradoxes and irrelevances, the authors set to avoid the over-insistent authorial rhetoric of Edwardian novels.

Advertisement

They felt that the traditional techniques could not meet the social pressures of the new age. They rejected the socio descriptive novel in favour of a novel centring on the character itself.
In a 1962 dissertation, E. Stephens argues that the stream of consciousness came into literature around 1914 after the First World War and created “a new standard of value” in that the writer became interested in exploring the private world and its values as an area of expression. Writers found out that in dealing with the psyche, no static patterns of description nor chronological reactions sufficed. It was discovered that a dynamic pattern was necessary to record the fluidity of consciousness.

Beyond William James, writers found Sigmund Freud’s study in psychoanalysis very useful. It is said that James Joyce was interested in the work of Freud. In his book The interpretation of Dreams Freud says, “The unconscious is the larger circle which includes the smaller of the conscious; everything conscious has a preliminary unconscious stage… The unconscious is the true psychic reality; in its inner nature, it is as much unknown to us as the reality of the external world.”

Harry Levin’s defines interior monologue as “The internal monologue, in its nature on the order of poetry, is that unheard and unspoken speech by which a character expresses his inmost thoughts (those lying nearest to the unconscious) without regard to logical organisation.”

However in 2007, S. Blackmore challenged the usefulness of the stream of consciousness because he thinks it does not exist. She refers to it as an illusion. Her actual words are: “We must be clear what is meant by the word ‘illusion’. An illusion is not something that does not exist, like a phantom or phlogiston. Rather, it is something that it is not what it appears to be, like a visual illusion or a mirage. When I say that consciousness is an illusion I do not mean that consciousness does not exist. I mean that consciousness is not what it appears to be. If it seems to be a continuous stream of rich and detailed experiences, happening one after the other to a conscious person, this is the illusion.”

Stream of consciousness is a narrative style that tries to capture a character’s thought process in a realistic way. It’s an interior monologue, but it’s also more than that. Because it’s mimicking the non-linear way our brains work, stream-of-consciousness narration includes a lot of free association, looping repetitions, sensory observations, and strange (or even non-existent) punctuation and syntax—all of which helps us to better understand a character’s psychological state and worldview.

Advertisement

It is meant to feel like you have dipped into the stream of the character’s consciousness—or like you’re a fly on the wall of their mind.
Authors who use this technique are aiming for emotional and psychological truth: they want to show a snapshot of how the brain actually moves from one place to the next. Thought isn’t linear, these authors point out; we don’t really think in logical, well-organised, or even complete sentences.

Advertisement

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Part One

Published

on

Attentive readers will recall that some weeks ago, I scribbled a series of pieces on elections due to be held in the UK, France, South Africa, and the USA. These elections were unusually critical for the well-being of their countries and even that of the world.

The results of the last of these elections are now with us and we are faced with the devastating news that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House.

I can hardly think of worse news to swallow or to equip the world to survive the years ahead.

The Dump, as I call him, is one of the most odious, dangerous, untrustworthy individuals currently inhabiting planet Earth. To cite a few of his demerits: he is a convicted felon; he believes climate change is a hoax; he is a sexist and a racist (one of his former military advisers has gone so far as to describe him as a fascist).

He is a snuggle buddy of the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and will probably discontinue aid to Ukraine as it resists invasion by Russia. Western European allies such as France, Germany and the UK are dismayed at his victory, as he holds the principles of democracy and constitutionalism in contempt.

As for Africa, well, he once described it as a “shit country,” so don’t look forward to much support from him.

Readers who spent time at the NUL will remember my dear colleague Katt Lissard who is now back home in New York. She spent some years with us as a Professor specialising in Theatre studies and was the Artistic Director of our international Winter / Summer Institute for Theatre for Development.

Many activists in the USA like Katt, who don’t see themselves as part of the political mainstream, chose to campaign for the Democrats and Kamala Harris in the hope of keeping Trump and the far right out of power. Confronted with the news of Trump’s victory, she sent an email to friends noting this was “just a brief check-in from the incomprehensible USA.”

She then explained: “We’re in shock and the early days of processing, but white supremacy, misogyny and anti-immigrant bias are alive and well and driving the boat here.” So, how do Katt and millions of decent, like-minded Americans plan to weather the storm?

Katt explained: “We were deeply depressed and deeply furious as it became clear that one of the worst human beings on the planet was going back to the White House, but we are still breathing and know that we will in the days ahead begin to formulate plans and strategies—and not just for heading north across the Canadian border.”

Picking up on that last point, it may well be that many decent Americans might just up and off across the border; Canada had better prepare for an avalanche of applications for residence permits.

And not just from Americans; in, for example, the American university system alone there are many many Africans employed in high positions (Professors and such-like), who must now face the fact they are living in a country whose leader despises them and who may opt to get out.

In her email written to her friends, once the news from hell had been confirmed, Katt quoted a piece by Rebecca Solnit, one of the most exciting writers at work in the USA today (readers may remember that I have previously reviewed two of her books for this newspaper, Whose Story is This? and Recollections of My Non-Existence).

Now Solnit is a feminist and at the heart of her work is a dissection of the way women have been marginalised in the USA (let’s remember that Kamala Harris, the Presidential candidate who lost to Trump, did so partly because so many American males could not bring themselves to vote for a woman.

I am thinking of the kind of male who invaded the White House when it was announced Trump had lost the 2020 election, bare-chested and wearing cow-horn helmets on their numbskull heads).

Solnit has this to say on our response to the Trump victory: “They want you to feel powerless and to surrender and to let them trample everything and you are not going to let them.

You are not giving up and neither am I. The fact that we cannot save everything does not mean we cannot save anything and everything we can save is worth saving.

You may need to grieve or scream or take time off, but you have a role no matter what, and right now good friends and good principles are worth gathering in.

Remember what you love. Remember what loves you. Remember in this tide of hate what love is.” And then: “A lot of us are going to resist by building solidarity and sanctuary.”

What is so morale-boosting about Solnit’s piece is not just her vision but also her command of language.
Her writing is so crisp and elegant. Language comes at us at its best, of course, in literature, and when I heard that the Dump was on the move back to the White House, I immediately recalled one of the most startling poems in the English language, “The Second Coming” by the Irish poet WB Yeats.

I’ll kick off with that next week.

To be concluded

Chris Dunton

Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending