Connect with us


The Ministry of Economic Development and Planning



Botswana and Eswatini have mastered the art of doing instead of talking. That is the reason why Gaborone and Mbabane’s city landscapes are full of cranes everywhere you go, whilst Lesotho is busy planning.
We live in a very strange country; a country that claims to be serious about job creation yet it’s anti-development. In my previous opinion piece, I quoted a phrase that my mentor over-emphasized every time we met. He would say, “Development equals jobs”. No jobs without development and no tax-revenue without the private sector.

Let’s be honest, Lesotho is not serious at all about development especially infrastructure development. Look at the condition of our roads! So, I still wonder what the purpose of the recent jobs and investment summit was.
Was it held with genuine intentions to package projects that can generate jobs? Or was the government simply staging a show to convince the general public that it is doing something about job creation? Or was it a way of convincing donor partners such as the IMF and the European Union that something is being done to address the jobs crisis?

Whatever the reasons were, my opinion is that it was simply a waste of time, money and energy. Some of the efforts that were put in the jobs summit have simply gone in vain.
An example was a project that I personally presented at the same jobs and investment summit. The project has gone straight to the dustbin.

The project I presented was a hotel development that was meant to generate well over a thousand jobs. The total cost of the development/investment was 1.2 Billion Maloti. The development was meant to be the tallest building in Lesotho when completed.
It featured 200 hotel rooms, 30 luxury apartments, conference facilities and retail on the ground floor (kindly refer to the artist impressions of the development as shown in the pictures).

It took about two years to package the project at a heavy cost because I had to engage various consultants for specialized skills. Projects of that nature usually cost about 2.5 million Maloti/Rands to package because of various studies that need to be conducted before any investor can inject a sizable amount of money.

I had to self-finance most of the costs related to packaging the project because the Lesotho government does not have funding or support for the preparation stage of projects. That’s why most serious countries such as Botswana, have a project preparation fund that is made available to entrepreneurs.

Anyway, to cut the long story short, the project was the biggest project at the jobs summit in terms of monetary value and was meant to create the highest number of jobs.
The project ended up destroyed after one government agency that deals with housing and land development (housing corporation), decided to pull the carpet during the process of presenting the development at the jobs summit.
The housing and land development agency that I won’t mention by name on this platform, had given my company a mandate to develop one of its sites under a build, operate and transfer (BOT) deal.

The mandate was unfortunately withdrawn/revoked for very flimsy and dubious reasons. I’m still yet to get the full version of the story from some of the board members of the housing corporation. Well, I was informed that the decision was made entirely by the board of which I still doubt.
I tried tirelessly to request intervention from the parent ministry of the housing corporation, at the Ministry of Local government and got no help. I went to the Ministry of Tourism and got promises for assistance but nothing came to fruition. I wrote a letter of intervention to the PS of the Ministry of Planning and got no reply. Not even an acknowledgment letter.

What we were promised as entrepreneurs was that the Ministry of Planning was willing to assist to break barriers and cut any re-tape that occurred. There was a group of Malaysian consultants that worked tirelessly to facilitate the smooth process of preparing the presentations for the summit.
The Malaysian consultants had a system named economic labs that was meant to focus all efforts into one project and to cut all the red-tape presented in the implementation phase of each project. What I found impressive, were efforts attempted by the Malaysian team in trying to assist entrepreneurs to break barriers. They really tried and acted professionally.

However, I realized that the Ministry of Planning had some serious shortcomings when it came to the facilitation process of projects. Very serious shortcomings. In all honesty, some of the staff members tried to assist where they could but were often sabotaged by government bureaucracy.

All in all the 1.2 Billion Maloti project is no more and Lesotho has lost an opportunity to create over a thousand jobs. My investors have decided to re-direct the investment to one South African metro-municipality and it has been welcomed with open arms.
Look, who cares about business in Lesotho? Who cares whether Lesotho loses an investment or not? No one! Maybe the First Lady could. I’m still of the opinion that the First Lady could have done something to intervene in the madness at the housing corporation.

In my interactions with various Government officials, not one is serious about business and economic development. No one is a champion of enterprise development. Not even the Ministry of Trade and Industry. It is focused on international travel and factory shells. We have a problem as a nation!

That brings me to this pertinent point: There is a gap in government where entrepreneurs and investors can present their projects. There is a vacuum where government officials can run with projects through the various stages of the development process. Some people can argue that, the function is a responsibility of the LNDC.

However, I think the LNDC is not focused on domestic investments. Well, it’s a debate for another day. However, there isn’t a single ministry that can cut all the red-tape and present projects all the way to the cabinet and follow-up on implementation. That is the reason why projects lie idle on Ministers desks and gather dust for years. We have a problem!
Secondly the lack of a project preparation fund will be the reason why most projects will never see the light of day. Entrepreneurs need funding for feasibility studies and other technical studies such EIA’s that may be needed on each project stage.

My opinion is that the Ministry of Planning is focused on the macro-economic planning of the economy and “manpower”. The ministry has also focused entirely on the National Strategic Development Plan (NSDP). The main weakness comes in the actual implementation and follow-up of proposed developments and projects.

I think we need to re-engineer the Ministry of Planning & Development into the Ministry of Economic Development and Planning. It is a matter of re-positioning the viewpoint of the ministry from Planning to a wider scope of developing a vibrant economy.

That involves with dealing with different spheres and dimensions obstacles in each of the top four industries that have been earmarked for job creation, namely, Tourism, Commercial Agriculture, ICT and Manufacturing. Each sector needs a separate department of specialists within the new ministry.
Economic development will encompass the macro-economic planning that is informed or backed-up by sound statistics. That is the reason why it is imperative to create an autonomous statistics authority that will assist Government and entrepreneurs with sound decision-making.

The current Bureau of Statistics is under-resourced, under-staffed and lack credibility. It needs autonomy to work freely without any interference from the Ministry of Planning. Statistics are a backbone of any economic planning or policy making.  There is no sound government that can attempt to run a state without sound and credible statistics. It’s impossible.

Look, government needs to walk the talk. Our country has done enough talking to last a lifetime. We have also done enough workshops as a nation. That’s all we see on LTV. We hardly ever see any ribbon cutting of “serious” developments.
Our biggest weakness as a country comes in the doing. In getting our hands dirty. Basotho have a famous phrase that says, “linala mobung”, which can be loosely translated into getting one’s hands and nails dirty by doing the work.

‘Mako Bohloa

Continue Reading


We need a coordinated approach on youth challenges



For a number of good reasons, all of us are concerned about problems that face Lesotho’s young people, particularly youth unemployment, and the increasing tendency towards anti-social behaviour among sections of Lesotho youth including their increasing admiration for criminality.

Not only do members of such groups admire criminality and actually commit crimes but they commit crimes without much care as to the harm and other costs that their actions inflict on immediate victims and on society-at-large.

Evidence of public concern about these problems includes the fact that within society individuals, groups and public and private institutions have all expressed concerns over problems facing the youth, with some of these parties making attempts to come up with ideas and measures to assist.

However, a number of problems seem to be emerging on, at least, three fronts. Firstly, a seeming lack of coordination in addressing problems that face young people. Secondly, lack of clarity on questions of whether (a) parties that seek to assist are basing their interventions on credibly identified sources of problems that face young people; and (b) whether any credible assessments are made to ensure that interventions such parties are proposing and implementing have potential to solve problems that face Lesotho’s young people.

There are many examples of what may seem to us, members of the general public, to be lack of coordination in approaches to solve problems facing young people. One such example may be sufficient. On January 8, 2024, Lesotho TV broadcast a statement in which the Lesotho Defence Force (LDF) authorities announced establishment of some army facility where Basotho young people would be taught some values, including patriotism.

The very next day, on January 9, 2024, Lesotho TV broadcast another statement, this time by the Lesotho Mounted Police Service (LMPS) authorities, announcing the LMPS’s plan to establish a police facility at which young people would be taught anti-crime and other values. In their essence, the LMPS’s plan sounded not totally dissimilar to LDF’s.
Apart from the LDF and LMPS’s plans for Lesotho’s youth, there are also public and private sector initiatives to nurture and support entrepreneurial talents of Lesotho’s youth with a view, among others, to fight youth unemployment and develop the country’s private sector.

Politicians have also been seen to sponsor football games for young people in their constituencies with a view, they say, to keep young people from crime and narcotics. These events cannot be criticised too much but given that they are one, or two-day events that take place during specific times, they look more like publicity stunts.

National sports federations are now complaining that politicians who sponsor these events put too much stress on sports as a means to fight crime. What federations want is that, if politicians want to help, they should stress the importance of sports as careers, and sponsor young people to develop their sporting talents accordingly.

Amidst expressions of concerns and various parties’ attempts to address problems facing Lesotho youth, public authorities that we have not heard from, or from who we do not hear enough, are those charged with responsibilities over precisely problems facing young people; that is, authorities at the Ministry of Youth.

Admittedly, we do not know if the initiatives of the LDF, LMPS, and others are carried out in consultation with or with the blessing of the Ministry of Youth.

The worry ought to be not only whether interventions of the LDF, LMPS, and others have the blessings of the Ministry of Youth. Instead, the worry should extend to the question of whether the Ministry has any national plan to address problems facing young people. And, if such a plan exists, we would expect that it identifies the LDF and LMPS as places where young place can be coached; and initiatives of these and other institutions would align with such a plan.

Without an identification of the army and the police as implementing agencies of the Ministry’s plan, and without the army and police’s initiatives alignment with the Ministry’s plan, at least two things are likely to result: duplication of effort — as seems to be the case with the LDF and LPMS plans; or, at worst, LDF and LMPS plans might contradict and undermine national plans entrusted to the Ministry of Youth.

In the worst case scenario that a national plan does not exist, we face the danger that anybody wishing to address problems facing Lesotho’s young people can do so, basing herself, or himself on a personal or group perception, and implementing plans and solutions based on such perception.

As in the case of too many people stirring the same cooking pot without coordination, undesirable consequences can be expected from a situation where just about anybody can apply a solution to a public problem.

As hinted above, a good national plan aimed at addressing problems that face Lesotho’s young people would have two characteristics, at least. First, it would be based on our assertion of the kind of society we want to be; an investigation of problems that stand in the way of achieving such a society; how such problems can be overcome, say, through school curricula; and how, in general, from Early Childhood Care & Development (ECCD), young people can be brought up and socialised in ways that ensure they will be useful members of a society we wish to be.

Any action that is not based on an investigation of the problems that stand in the way of achieving a society we want to be has little chances of success. Such action would be based on some understanding that the young who are anti-social, unpatriotic and criminals are naturally bad people.

It is, of course, not as simple as that. For example, one possible explanation for the absence of patriotism among young people may have something to do with socio-economic inequality in Lesotho: those who are closed out of, and excluded from, benefiting from Lesotho’s wealth and power cannot be expected to be patriots.

A second characteristic of a plan aimed at addressing problems that face Lesotho’s young people is that, such a plan should identify and/or establish institutions designed — and with appropriate skills — to implement ideas and proposals that come out of credible investigations.

It is unclear whether the LDF and LMPS plans have resulted from something like considerations suggested above. While it is admitted that these institutions’ initiatives are limited to addressing problems of lack of patriotism and criminality among the young people, one clear problem with their plans and solutions is that, it might be the case that they are catching young people a little late, when schooling and general socialisation have already entrenched anti-social values that we see among sections of young people; namely, individualism and the inability to think of others.

In one word, these institutions catch these young people when tendencies towards criminality, anti-social behaviour, and lack of patriotism might have already hardened.
Perhaps the biggest hope we should have is that the army and the police will have full complement of resources necessary for providing full and wholesome mentoring to young people who undergo army and police mentoring.

Short of adequate resources necessary for achieving what the army and the police have in mind, we might end up with cohorts of young people with a faulty army and police culture that may come back to haunt us. Inserting a faulty army culture among a section of young people brought us bitter results in the 1970s and 1980s that should not be repeated.

To conclude, no one can argue against all of us being concerned with problems of youth unemployment; increasing tendencies of young people’s admiration of criminality and their participation in crime. And no one can argue against all of us coming up with ideas and proposals of how to address these problems.

However, our concerns and proposals ought to be based on:
a nationally-agreed assertion of society we want to be;
a credible investigation of difficulties that stand in the way of us becoming society we want to be;

and coordination of proposals and ideas aimed at becoming society we want to be.

As with other specific instances of socio-economic development in Lesotho, problems facing the country’s young people cry out for the long-neglected establishment of the National Planning Board, as prescribed in Section 105 of the Constitution of Lesotho.

Prof Motlatsi Thabane

Continue Reading


Call that a muffin?



In Oscar Wilde’s short story “The Canterville Ghost” (1887) one of the characters says about the British, “We have everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language.” Between American English and British English there are many, many differences. Which is not to say that either American or British English are standardised; there are multiple varieties within each. As a south-western Brit I can find it difficult to fully understand what someone from Liverpool or Newcastle is saying.

I remember one year during the NUL’s International Theatre for Development project we had a student from the islands of Scotland. She was brilliant and hard-working and full of good ideas — if only one could understand the ideas when she introduced them. The NUL students grouped together and asked me: “Chris, can you translate what Kirsty is saying for us?” and I replied: “I’m as lost as you are.”

Between American and British English it’s not just a matter of pronunciation but also of vocabulary (I’ll be coming to muffins — see the title of this piece — in a while) and spelling.
In the biographical film Prick Up Your Ears British, dramatist Joe Orton shares a room with Ken Halliwell and they decide to write a novel together. Ken asks Joe “can you spell?” and Joe replies “yes, but not accurately.”

This is hardly a surprise, given that he’s a Brit. The American spelling system is far more regular and rational than the British. (Readers with laptops will have noticed that your spell-check gives the option of British or American spelling, but that doesn’t help you as in Lesotho the British system is used, so for the time being you’re stuck with it).

I mean, what can you say about a spelling system where “plough” rhymes with “now”, but “tough” rhymes with “stuff”– and “now” doesn’t rhyme with “low.” Yipes (as the Americans say). When I was lecturing in Lesotho and in Nigeria and marking assignments I was always very lenient over spelling, because I know what a mountain it is to climb (the latter word rhyming with “time”, of course).

Then there is the matter of vocabulary or denotation (a term I hope readers remember from a few weeks back). There are many examples of things that are denoted by different words in British and American English: lift / elevator; pavement / sidewalk; windscreen / windshield; petrol / gas; cinema / movie theater (and look at the American spelling of (Brit) “theatre”– a lot easier). And some of these reflect our different histories.

For example, there’s a vegetable, a kind of small marrow, the British call it a courgette (one of my favourite vegetables, in case any of you are planning to invite me for dinner). That’s a word that British English has borrowed directly from French — that is, a loan word (I’m not sure we plan to give it back).

The Americans on the other hand call it a zucchini, a loan word from Italian, which I guess reflects the size and influence of the Italian community in the USA. (Speaking of vegetables, I can’t give you an explanation for why the Brits call an aubergine an aubergine — another loan word from French — but the Americans call it an egg-plant).

Next week I’ll get around to muffins — a sore point — and I’ll move on to differences between English and French and between Sesotho and Setswana. Bet you can’t wait.

Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

Continue Reading


Lessons from Israel: Part 3



I shall round off my account of my 1995 trip to Israel by putting on my tour guide cap. Staying in Tel Aviv, most days were fully taken up by the conference, which was my reason for being there. Tel Aviv in July is scorchingly hot, so there were walks along the beach only before breakfast and after sunset. I did take a little time off to go with South African author Stephen Gray to an art gallery that had a painting he wanted to see (a portrait by Modigliani of Beatrice Hastings, whose biography Stephen was then writing).

I wasn’t especially keen on the hotel restaurant, where dinner comprised meat served by the ton (surprisingly little fish, given that we were on the coast. By contrast, I had always been surprised and happy that Maseru restaurants are so good on fish, despite the fact that Lesotho isn’t exactly maritime). But I discovered a little Russian Jewish restaurant that offered Beluga caviar at an amazingly cheap price. I suspect it had fallen off the back of a lorry, as we say in the UK — i.e. that it was contraband, acquired illegally. I just blinked innocently and enjoyed myself. I can’t think of a more delicious way of starting a meal than with caviar, freshly-made blinis and a large glass of deeply chilled Wyberowa vodka — no ice, please. (I only say all this to show you what a very cosmopolitan chap I am).

The conference ran to a packed schedule and we worked hard (no, really). Half-way through we were given a day off and taken to Jerusalem. On arrival I teamed up with an old Nigerian friend and a friend of his from Senegal and we took ourselves first to the Dome of the Rock, the main mosque, which is splendid and radiant (wow, the mosaics!) Then we saw the Wailing Wall.

Then we trudged up the Via Dolorosa to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The Via marks the route along which Christ was forced to carry his cross on the way to his crucifixion (dolorosa means something like “of miseries”). I had expected it to be lined with sculptures showing the Stations of the Cross (rather like the lovely ones at Fatima, near Ramabanta).

Instead it was one tourist gift shop after another. Here I came across one of the most repugnant things I’ve seen in my life. Proudly displayed for sale, a wall clock with the face adorned with the image of the head of Christ, the two clock hands protruding from his nose.

At the top of the Via Dolorosa, the fourth century Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the holiest site in the world for Christians, which is breathtakingly beautiful. The interior is (not visibly) divided into sections, the upkeep of each of which is the responsibility of one of the major denominations: Roman Catholic, Anglican, Methodist, Greek Orthodox, Egyptian Coptic, and so on. I had had the impression this was an arrangement worked out under the colonial regime of British Palestine, but Google tells me it dates back to the Status Quo of 1757.

My companions had done their homework and suggested we head first for the roof, which had been allocated to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church (dare one possibly suggest a tinge of racism in this marginalisation?). There we found a cluster of monkish cells, each inhabited by an elderly Ethiopian monk, at least two of whom spoke English or French. They were delighted to see us, and utterly sweet, hospitable, and in their accounts of their pastoral work spellbinding.

To be concluded

Chris Dunton

Continue Reading