Connect with us

Insight

‘We’ll eat for you’

Published

on

The old man sits on his chair by the gate every Sunday morning waiting for the taxi that will ferry him to church, or so I guess. I pass him on my way to work, for the state of affairs in the pocket of the citizen in this country is that one will have to miss church sometimes, to ensure that there is food on the table, that there is money to pay the rent; it is the constant that comes with living in the concrete jungle: you cannot stop for a moment, you have to keep on moving, otherwise you and the family shall perish.
The old man has the benefit of old age, and from the finely cut suits he dons every Sunday, it is safe to assume that he worked hard in the days of his youth and saved enough to see him comfortably through the twilight years of his life.

It is a benefit many of us in this generation shall never get to have, for permanent employment is an elusive affair, meaning that one is often forced to live hand to mouth and cannot save enough for the pensioner days. The days pass and the scenes change, but there is one constant sight one comes across on these trips: abject poverty that forces people to gather as ants in churches for some moment of respite before they face the long week.

There are three or four churches that hold their services in the classrooms of the school right next door to where I am engaged in the maintenance of the house, and they keep me company with their choruses of ‘Amen’ and ‘Hallelujah’ that punctuate the end of every voice that is pastoring them in their services. I go on following the paintbrush and focus on ensuring that every coat is smooth, that there are no dribbles or smudges on the wall where the roller has passed in my pursuit of smoothness.
The four pastors preach on, and the congregants’ amen and hallelujah rises to fever pitch and I smile, true what that Greek or Roman philosopher once said: religion is indeed the opiate of the masses.

For what would we be without the preachers and the mullahs of the word? The likelihood is that many of us would be languishing in bars, quaffing pints and quarts to chase the blues away as the figures do in a Marechera or Mwangi piece.
There is some kind of axis the human soul has to hinge on, of the kind that keeps the soul calm enough to see the individual sane through the day. Without some sense of belonging, the human mind soon drifts off to nonsense and the owner thereof engages in activities of an unsavoury kind. Let the preacher preach on as the roller dips into the tray and whitewashes the walls of the room I am working in.

Advertisement

I have always gone out to pursue perfection, and I was fortunate enough to make the decision to be the best there can be in whatever pursuit I choose to follow, whether it be gardening, or painting, or writing; the pursuit is for excellence that is constant, that is, there is no job that ranks below another in the little world that one has so far made in the years after graduation.
There were no jobs back then (post-graduation), there are no jobs still, and the wise go out to their menial ‘piece jobs’ to please the client and to ensure that they get called back for other jobs that come after the one they are doing at the moment.

The secret to success in the piece job business is to build a loyal client base, that is, people that are so impressed with the work that you do that they will call you for other jobs in the future.
It takes a lot of sacrifice to build a client base, from compromising on the charge for the job based on the circumstances of the client, to accepting ridiculously low prices for one’s work to build reputation or to impress a hard client (and there are many of those in this here country).

The biggest secret however is to focus on one’s level of prestige and to maintain it. Every job is important and should be approached as such, treating certain jobs as low class surely erodes one’s reputation because it then opens the door to criticism (and there are more critics than there are flies).
Thinking that Mr So is better than Mrs Si based on their job or income leads to one underperforming when it comes to doing jobs for either of the clients and believe me, they will pass information about the shoddy job on to other potential clients, which leads to the depletion of the client base, and this in turn adversely affects the flow of income. There is just no better or best, there is only meticulous and shoddy in the handyman line of business.

The successful handyman is he or she that respects their craft first and honours the clients at all times. People are not there as your private ATM’s that will drag you out of poverty to the heights where the Motsepes are; treat everyone with an equal sense of respect even if you know who they are because when it comes to money, there is no one that ranks higher than another.
Set out to be fair in your prices, that is, the value should match the effort put in the execution of the task and not the pocket of the client, which is an error many of the newbies commit in their quest to buy a new Honda Fit just six months after setting out with their trowels and spirit levels. The basic understanding should be that the only get rich quick scheme available to us mere mortals is the lotto, and working with the people is not one of the ways one can follow if they want to be millionaires in two seconds.

Coming to this issue of working with the people, there is a group that takes the oath to further the interests of the people and to answer their needs that seems to forget the promises as soon as they ascend the seats of power and to enter the houses of parliament on the continent of Africa.
The political class on this continent are a section of society that at most seems impious when it comes to honouring the words of their lobbying speeches.
It is as if the speeches made at the rallies are only made for the sake of getting one into parliament and nothing more. It has become a constant that the people will address their needs and only to have them remain unanswered until some donor nation comes with some aid to answer those needs. Upon entering any house or workspace, one as a craftsman first assesses the scene and establishes the amount of work to be done, this helps one to make a proper quotation, that is, to note the gross cost of the repair or maintenance work to be done.

Advertisement

Far often, the payment to the labourer or artisan is not part of this stage of the process, for the work to be done is actually more important than the reward at this point.
The politician knows even before he or she enters parliament what the needs of the masses are, how they forget them as soon as they enter parliament is a mystery, for then the feeding troughs in the form of the fiscus become overcrowded.

A playwright I know penned a play on the state of African politics more than ten years ago, the piece was aptly named Table Manners in allusion to the state of affairs on the African political landscape.
Borrowing from the usual practice that one should be silent at the dinner table, this writer saw African politics as one affair where the masses are told to shut up as the lords get down to the business of emptying state coffers at the expense of the welfare of the masses.

No one is supposed to speak a word in opposition, lest they be silenced in various unsavoury ways. And so the political lords eat whilst the masses suffer in silence and the poverty of a continent reputed to be rich in terms of natural resources plunges deeper into the depths of regression.
It is a wonder why one should be silent when one sees the different faces of poverty on a daily basis, when the children go to bed hungry and the man or woman that promised to pull them out of their demise sits down to sumptuous meals at dinner tables. This means that the lure is not to help the people, the cause is not to plead the case of the masses or to see the position in parliament as a calling or duty.

Rather the position of minister or Member of Parliament is seen as an invitation to the dinner table, and the steak on the plate is the fiscus that is supposed to address the varying needs of the masses.
I would not be where I am at this moment in time had I seen my clients as bags of money to fill my bank account, they would all be gone and with time, I would have been pushing the brown envelope as the fresh graduates do.
The belief is that the system of governance currently in operation shall last forever, but recent evidence shows that people are getting fed up with it (if the voter turnout statistics during the polls are to be relied upon).

The basic truth of history is that no empire lasts forever, and it would be delusional of anyone to think that political governance of the sort we are currently using shall last forever. Like others that came before it, it shall go away, and Karl Marx’s Utopia shall come.
The nobles of ancient Rome thought their sophisticated empire would last forever, it went down with time and the feasts were forgotten as the people came to their senses and sought the type of system of rule that served the needs of the plebeian masses of the land.

Advertisement

How the similarities between the Rome of old and the present time cannot be seen escapes one’s common sense and understanding. The ruling classes lived high up there on the house on top of the hill and the masses lived in hovels in ghettoes. Taxed, deprived of the sole means of livelihood, constantly harassed and forced into silence, the masses got tired and revolted.
It has happened in various regimes on the African continent, from Mobutu to Mubarak, and with each passing day, one sees the signs of its advent in this kingdom as the gap between the rich and the poor widens, and the hopelessness takes precedence.
It does not take much to realise that we have a political class that is at best aloof, more inclined to serve the polarised views of the ruling parties’ followers than to address the needs of the citizens of the state in entirety.

The proposed reforms may never take off largely due to the high levels of vindictiveness and apparent lack in forgiveness amongst the leading parties in the negotiations. There is absolutely no sense of reconciliation or forgiveness amongst the parties involved, only constant accusation on wrongs the reforms process is supposed solve.
The question is: how then are we supposed to reach a point of consensus that will see the state weaned from its sad political past if the question is not reform but prosecution? One cannot reform if one is not willing to compromise, for the truth of the matter is that both sides have wronged each other in differing ways.
If one side chooses to see itself as the righteous side and the other as the wrongdoers, then there is no way a point of truce shall be reached, and the state needs such a point more than political opinion that changes with each passing regime.

There have far been too many instances where this country got close to getting a new lease on life only to have it overturned by political opinion.
This country was born out of reconciliation, in fact, the original ruler of Lesotho, Morena Moshoeshoe I, is the quintessential icon of true reconciliation and forgiveness and a true patron of peace: why are we then not following his sacred example instead of following overzealous political opinion that changes as fast as floor-crossing in parliament?

The truth is that political governance has in fact done more harm than good in this country. Political reform should be the actual focal point of the reforms, the others are just mere scapegoats: political thought is the actual culprit that is preventing the state from reaching a point where progress becomes a constant all can follow.
In a kingdom, the serf that ascends a seat of power is prone to err, not out of poor judgement, but mainly because such power is a powerful drug that misleads people into being what they are not, for power corrupts, so Bishop Tutu once said.

By: Tšepiso S. Mothibi

Advertisement

Advertisement

Insight

Down in the Dump: Conclusion

Published

on

I closed last week by recording the dreadful news that trashy Trump had been elected called to mind WB Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming.” This is the poem whose opening lines gave Chinua Achebe the phrase “things fall apart.”

Yeats observes “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

It was written in 1919 and controversially uses Christian imagery relating to the Apocalypse and the Second Coming to reflect on the atmosphere in Europe following the slaughter of the First World War and the devastating flu epidemic that followed this.

It also reflects on the Irish War of Independence against British rule.

Advertisement

In lines that I can now read as if applying to the recent American election, Yeats mourns: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.”

And then I can visualise Trump in the poem’s closing lines: “What rough beast is this, its hour come round at last, / Slouching towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Trump is certainly a rough beast and isn’t the choice of verb, slouching, just perfect? For a non-allegorical account of the threat posed by the Dump, I can’t do better than to quote (as I often do) that fine South African political journalist, Will Shoki. In his words: “Trump’s administration simply won’t care about Palestinians, about the DRC, about the Sudanese.

It will be indifferent to the plight of the downtrodden and the oppressed, who will be portrayed as weak and pathetic. And it will give carte blanche [that is, free rein] to despotism and tyranny everywhere.

Not even social media, that once revered third-space we associated with subversion and revolution in the first quarter of the 21st century can save us because Silicon Valley is in Trump’s back pocket.”

Advertisement

So what follows the triumph of the Dump? We can’t just sit down and moan and bemoan. In a more recent piece of hers than the one I quoted last week, Rebecca Solnit has observed: “Authoritarians like Trump love fear, defeatism, surrender. Do not give them what they want . . . We must lay up supplies of love, care, trust, community and resolve — so we may resist the storm.”

Katt Lissard tells me that on November 7th following the confirmation of the election result, in the daytime and well into the evening in Manhattan, New York, there was a large demonstration in support of the immigrants Trump despises.

And a recent piece by Natasha Lennard gives us courage in its title “The Answer to Trump’s Victory is Radical Action.”

So, my Basotho readers, how about the peaceful bearing of some placards in front of the US Embassy in Maseru? Because the Dump doesn’t like you guys and gals one little bit.

One last morsel. I had intended to end this piece with the above call to action, but can’t resist quoting the following comment from the New York Times of November 13th on Trump’s plans to appoint his ministers.

Advertisement

I’m not sure a satirical gibe was intended (the clue is in the repeated use of the word “defence”), but it made me guffaw nonetheless. “Trump will nominate Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host with no government experience, as his defence secretary. Hegseth has often defended Trump on TV.” You see, it’s all about the Dump.

  • Chris Dunton is a former Professor of English and Dean of Humanities at the National University of Lesotho.

 

Continue Reading

Insight

A question of personal gain

Published

on

Recently, an audio recording featuring the distressed MP for Thaba-Bosiu Constituency, Joseph Malebaleba, circulated on social media. The MP appears to have spent a sleepless night, struggling with the situation in which he and his associates from the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) party were denied a school feeding tender valued at M250 million per annum.

In 2022, Lesotho’s political landscape underwent a significant shift with the emergence of the RFP led by some of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Among them was Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane, arguably one of the richest people in Lesotho, who took the helm as the party’s leader and ultimately, the Prime Minister of Lesotho.

The RFP’s victory in the general election raised eyebrows, and their subsequent actions have sparked concerns about the motivations behind their involvement in politics.

In an interview with an American broadcasting network just after he won the elections, Matekane made a striking statement, proclaiming that he would run Lesotho exactly as he runs his business.

Advertisement

At first glance, many thought he was joking, but as time has shown, his words were far from an idle threat. In the business world, the primary goal is to maximize profits, and it appears that the RFP is adopting a similar approach to governance.

Behind the scenes, alarming developments have been unfolding. A communication from an RFP WhatsApp group revealed a disturbing request from the Minister of Communications, Nthati Moorosi, who asked if anyone in the group had a construction business and could inbox her.

This raises questions about the RFP’s focus on using government resources to benefit their own business interests.

The government has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of its officials. Recent reports have revealed shocking incidents of misuse of public funds and conflicts of interest among key government figures.

Over the past two years, the RFP has been accused of awarding government contracts to companies affiliated with their members, further solidifying concerns about their self-serving agenda. For instance, vehicles purchased for the police were allegedly sourced from suppliers connected to a Minister’s son and MP.

Advertisement

The MP for Peka, Mohopoli Monokoane, was found to have hijacked fertiliser intended to support impoverished farmers, diverting crucial resources away from those in need for personal gain.

Such actions not only betray the trust of the public but also have a direct impact on the livelihoods of vulnerable communities. Monokoane appeared before the courts of law this week.

While farmers voice their concerns regarding fertiliser shortages, it seems that Bishop Teboho Ramela of St. Paul African Apostolic Church, who is also a businessman, is allegedly involved in a corrupt deal concerning a M10 million fertilizer allocation, benefiting from connections with wealthy individuals in government.

The procurement of fertiliser appears to be mired in controversy; recall that the Minister of Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, Thabo Mofosi, was also implicated in the M43 million tender.

The renovation of government buildings with elaborate lighting systems was contracted to a company owned by the son of an MP. The RFP’s enthusiasm for infrastructure development, specifically road construction and maintenance, is also tainted by self-interest, as they have companies capable of performing these tasks and supplying the necessary materials, such as asphalt.

Advertisement

Minister Moteane finds himself in a compromising situation regarding a lucrative M100 million airport tender that was awarded to his former company. Ministers have even gone so far as to award themselves ownership of diamond mines.

Meanwhile, the nation struggles with national identification and passport shortages, which according to my analysis the RFP seems hesitant to address until they can find a way to partner with an international company that will benefit their own interests.

The people of Lesotho are left wondering if their leaders are truly committed to serving the nation or simply lining their own pockets. As the RFP’s grip on power tightens, the consequences for Lesotho’s democracy and economy hang precariously in the balance.

It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, lest the nation slide further into an era of self-serving governance.

In conclusion, the RFP’s dominance has raised serious concerns about the motives behind their involvement in politics. The apparent prioritisation of personal profit over public welfare has sparked widespread disillusionment and mistrust among the population.

Advertisement

As Lesotho navigates this critical juncture, it is essential that its leaders are held accountable for their actions and that the nation’s best interests are placed above those of individuals.

Only through collective effort and a strong commitment to transparency and accountability can Lesotho ensure a brighter future for all its citizens.

Ramahooana Matlosa

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Insight

Down in the Dump: Part One

Published

on

Attentive readers will recall that some weeks ago, I scribbled a series of pieces on elections due to be held in the UK, France, South Africa, and the USA. These elections were unusually critical for the well-being of their countries and even that of the world.

The results of the last of these elections are now with us and we are faced with the devastating news that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House.

I can hardly think of worse news to swallow or to equip the world to survive the years ahead.

The Dump, as I call him, is one of the most odious, dangerous, untrustworthy individuals currently inhabiting planet Earth. To cite a few of his demerits: he is a convicted felon; he believes climate change is a hoax; he is a sexist and a racist (one of his former military advisers has gone so far as to describe him as a fascist).

Advertisement

He is a snuggle buddy of the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and will probably discontinue aid to Ukraine as it resists invasion by Russia. Western European allies such as France, Germany and the UK are dismayed at his victory, as he holds the principles of democracy and constitutionalism in contempt.

As for Africa, well, he once described it as a “shit country,” so don’t look forward to much support from him.

Readers who spent time at the NUL will remember my dear colleague Katt Lissard who is now back home in New York. She spent some years with us as a Professor specialising in Theatre studies and was the Artistic Director of our international Winter / Summer Institute for Theatre for Development.

Many activists in the USA like Katt, who don’t see themselves as part of the political mainstream, chose to campaign for the Democrats and Kamala Harris in the hope of keeping Trump and the far right out of power. Confronted with the news of Trump’s victory, she sent an email to friends noting this was “just a brief check-in from the incomprehensible USA.”

She then explained: “We’re in shock and the early days of processing, but white supremacy, misogyny and anti-immigrant bias are alive and well and driving the boat here.” So, how do Katt and millions of decent, like-minded Americans plan to weather the storm?

Advertisement

Katt explained: “We were deeply depressed and deeply furious as it became clear that one of the worst human beings on the planet was going back to the White House, but we are still breathing and know that we will in the days ahead begin to formulate plans and strategies—and not just for heading north across the Canadian border.”

Picking up on that last point, it may well be that many decent Americans might just up and off across the border; Canada had better prepare for an avalanche of applications for residence permits.

And not just from Americans; in, for example, the American university system alone there are many many Africans employed in high positions (Professors and such-like), who must now face the fact they are living in a country whose leader despises them and who may opt to get out.

In her email written to her friends, once the news from hell had been confirmed, Katt quoted a piece by Rebecca Solnit, one of the most exciting writers at work in the USA today (readers may remember that I have previously reviewed two of her books for this newspaper, Whose Story is This? and Recollections of My Non-Existence).

Now Solnit is a feminist and at the heart of her work is a dissection of the way women have been marginalised in the USA (let’s remember that Kamala Harris, the Presidential candidate who lost to Trump, did so partly because so many American males could not bring themselves to vote for a woman.

Advertisement

I am thinking of the kind of male who invaded the White House when it was announced Trump had lost the 2020 election, bare-chested and wearing cow-horn helmets on their numbskull heads).

Solnit has this to say on our response to the Trump victory: “They want you to feel powerless and to surrender and to let them trample everything and you are not going to let them.

You are not giving up and neither am I. The fact that we cannot save everything does not mean we cannot save anything and everything we can save is worth saving.

You may need to grieve or scream or take time off, but you have a role no matter what, and right now good friends and good principles are worth gathering in.

Remember what you love. Remember what loves you. Remember in this tide of hate what love is.” And then: “A lot of us are going to resist by building solidarity and sanctuary.”

Advertisement

What is so morale-boosting about Solnit’s piece is not just her vision but also her command of language.
Her writing is so crisp and elegant. Language comes at us at its best, of course, in literature, and when I heard that the Dump was on the move back to the White House, I immediately recalled one of the most startling poems in the English language, “The Second Coming” by the Irish poet WB Yeats.

I’ll kick off with that next week.

To be concluded

Chris Dunton

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending