Connect with us

News

Dark clouds gather for Stone Shi

Published

on

MASERU-STONE Shi, the Chinese man who is the sole broker of Lesotho’s wool and mohair, could have misled the government about his ability to get better prices for local farmers.
Investigations by thepost have also revealed that Shi could be struggling to find buyers for the wool and mohair.
Shi touted himself as a skilled broker who could get better prices for Lesotho’s wool and mohair in China.

He said he could sell it faster because he is based in Lesotho and has direct contact with ready buyers in China. Against widespread reservations, the government then tinkered with regulations to force farmers to sell their wool and mohair locally.

As the only registered broker Shi became the only person to whom farmers could give their products.
Despite vehement resistance the government forced farmers to send their product to his Wool Centre in Thaba-Bosiu.

At that time Shi said he would get better prices than what the farmers were paid by international buyers at the BKB auction floors in Port Elizabeth. Out of options, most farmers surrendered their wool and mohair to Shi.
But things don’t seem to have worked out the way Shi wanted.

The first problem, investigations show, is that the wool is not selling as fast as he promised. By last week the Wool Centre had sold 600 tonnes of wool for M96 million, according to the centre’s spokesperson Manama Letsie. That is only 10 percent of the 6 000 tonnes Lesotho is estimated to have produced this year.

So farmers have to wait longer for their cheques while Shi struggles to find buyers for their wool.
Most have been waiting since October last year when they delivered their wool to the centre.
Some surrendered their fibre to Shi in November when it became clear that the government was not going to budge on the regulations. Thus far it is not clear how long it will take for Shi to sell all the wool.

A man of lofty promises, Shi initially said farmers were going to be paid 14 days after delivering their wool to the centre. That seems to have changed along the way. Now some farmers say he has told them that their payment could take as much as four months.

And when does the four months start? Farmers say Shi tells them that they should start counting from when the wool is delivered in China. But for the shipment to take the wool has to be auctioned in Lesotho first.
What is the schedule for the auctions? Shi tells farmers that he is not sure and they should just wait.

All this could be an indication that Shi might not have the financial capacity to pay the farmers and he is only waiting for payments from his buyers in China. Under normal circumstances brokers should have a strong financial backing to fund payments.

Shi does not seem to have a financial support from any local or international banks. It is that lack of money that could be behind the delayed payments.
By last week Shi was asking some farmers to submit their banking details after telling them that cheque paper is expensive. Farmers say he already had those banking details. And even if he didn’t, they still question why it took him so long to request them.

Thating Nkhahle, chairman of Mokhotlong Wool and Mohair Association, believes Shi is trying to buy time because “farmers’ account numbers were already available through stock sheets”.
“We have heard that some are already getting their money but we are yet to see proof,” Nkhahle says.
The “money” Nkhahle is referring to are small deposits some farmers have received.

Shi told thepost last week that he has paid about a 1 000 farmers. There are more than 40 000 wool and mohair farmers in the country.
Aaron Moketa, chairman of Moremoholo Stud in Mokhotlong, says last week farmers gathered at the shearing shed to submit their accounts.

“We went there last week Thursday to enquire what we should do to also get paid and we were told to provide account numbers as the cheque method seems costly,” Moketa says.
He says they were not sure when they will be paid after submitting the account numbers.
“We fulfilled the part of our deal to take wool and mohair to the centre now it is time for the centre to fulfill its side and pay us. Now we are really struggling to make ends meet.”

Despite struggling to get buyers, Shi is reportedly rejecting offers from some buyers. Two wool buyers tell this paper that Shi told them that he is only selling to buyers from China.
thepost can today reveal that Shi might have oversold his ability to get better prices. Facts don’t support that claim. The world’s biggest wool market is the Australian Wool Exchange where 50 000 bales are sold per week. To put that into perspective, Lesotho’s annual wool production is around 40 000 bales. It therefore follows that Australian Wool Exchange decides the global price of wool.

Logically, therefore, buyers will never pay more than what they pay on the exchange.
The same Chinese buyers Shi says are his potential clients are also at the exchange.
They are also buying from the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Argentina and South Africa.
The chances of them coming to Lesotho to buy 40 000 bales for higher prices are as nonexistent as the sun rising from the west and setting in the east.

An additional complication is that the wool Shi is selling has not been tested according to international standards. The established practice is that the wool in each bale is tested for strength, length, width and impurities before it is auctioned.

The quality of the wool Shi is peddling has not been verified. This untested wool is competing for buyers against the tested wool from other markets. It is highly unlikely that international buyers will shun tested wool for Lesotho’s untested wool.

This however does not mean that Basotho farmers have produced inferior wool. It just says the wool’s quality has not been tested to reassure the buyers.

Something is curious about the price Shi has been mentioning. Last week he told this newspaper that he had sold a kilogramme of wool for US$13. That is too precise a figure for a product whose price changes every minute on the auctions.

The reality is that there is no standard price of wool in the world because it changes every day. If Shi was running a true auction then the price would fluctuate. That is the nature of an auction.
The problem though is that Shi’s system is so opaque that it’s difficult to get accurate information. Up to this week farmers don’t know how much of their wool has been bought and for how much. Who bought their wool and when, only Shi knows.

Farmers don’t know if they are getting the right price for the correct product sold.
And that is where the US$13 issue becomes crucial. The exchange rate between the US Dollar and the Rand changes every second. A second is about how long it takes you to say the word ‘mohair’. The question then is what rate Shi is using to pay the farmers.

Is it the M14.6413 it was on, say, December 23 last year or the M14.13 of January 4 this year. Is it the M13.8124 it was last Thursday or the M13.61 at around 11am yesterday?
How does Shi decide which rate to use when paying the farmers? Do the farmers know what rate has been used and are they allowed access to the records so they can verify?

Equally important is whether they are aware that their wool is being sold in United States dollars.
For the past three weeks farmers have been getting between M500 and M3 000. And this is after more than two months of waiting. They bitterly complain that they don’t know how much of their wool Shi has sold and at what price.

Shi is also not telling them who bought their wool, is not forthcoming on the grades and won’t say when they are going to be paid, they say. They also point out that Shi does not seem to have exact records of what he has received from the farmers and has sold to China.

There is also something peculiar with the way Shi is selling the wool. He is receiving the wool and then shipping it to the buyers before telling the farmers how much they will get.
Farmers have to wait for months before they know the price of their wool.
International brokerage rules don’t work that way. Auctions don’t operate that way either. The standard practice is that the buyer makes an offer to the farmer through the broker. If the farmer agrees to the price the buyer will make a payment and then the farmer agrees to release the product through the broker.

The broker only ships the goods to the buyer when the farmer has received the payment. On wool auctions around the world that transaction takes between five and eight working days.
That is how the wool auctions in Port Elizabeth works and that is the system local farmers have known for more than 40 years.

Think of it like you are selling your house through an estate agent. The buyer makes an offer through the agent. If the buyer and the seller agree on the offer the payment is transferred.
Only when the seller has the payment will the agent start transferring the house to the buyer.
Shi is not using that model. Rather he is taking the wool from the farmers before they agree on the price. He will then pay the farmer when the buyer had paid him some weeks later.

The farmers don’t have a say in the price. Only Shi, the broker, and his buyers in China are negotiating the price. This is the same as the farmers loaning Shi their wool and then wait for him to decide what he wants to pay for it.
Mohair farmers are in a worse position. Shi has not sold a single thread of the 800 tonnes of mohair. Their wool is piling up at the centre while they struggle to survive. In a few weeks the mohair shearing season will start yet they have not received a single cent for last year’s harvest.

There is a reason Shi cannot sell the mohair to his wool buyers in China: South Africa is the biggest buyer of mohair. Even if he sells to a Chinese company it will have to ship the same mohair to South Africa for degreasing and processing. All other countries bring their mohair to South Africa for processing. This is common knowledge to anyone who is interested in the mohair market yet Shi does not seem to understand it.

thepost has been told that a number of buyers from South Africa have asked about the mohair but Shi has spurned their offer. One buyer told this paper that the problem was not that Shi did not want to sell but that he doesn’t seem to have an idea about what he has.

“We asked how much mohair he has and he said he doesn’t know. We said can we buy it and he said no. So how do we buy something we haven’t seen? It’s just a mess,” said a buyer.
With the mohair shearing season starting and Shi still stuck with old stock, he might find it hard to get enough storage space. It’s doesn’t help that wool in his warehouse is also moving slowly.

Meanwhile, farmers are starving. Moketa of the Moremoholo Stud in Mokhotlong says the situation is unbearable. He said now the shepherds have left to seek employment in South Africa because farmers are unable to pay them.
Rantelane Shea, a former MP who is a farmer, says there was no way to make the shepherds stay.

“We asked them in November to bear with us in December. Asking them to do as well as in January would not have been fair as they also have needs and families to provide for,” Shea said.
As Shi’s operations hobble along while farmers sink deeper in poverty, the case for more brokers has become stronger. Government has said it will license one or two more brokers.

A second player in the market will give farmers choice and force Shi to compete on both prices and operational efficiency. Without a competitor there is no one to measure him against.

Lemohang Rakotsoane & Shakeman Mugari

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Police hunt former minister

Published

on

THE police have launched a hunt for former police minister, Lepota Sekola, who is suspected of involvement in stock theft.
Police want to arrest Sekola in connection with two cattle carcasses that were found at his grandfather’s funeral in Borokhoaneng three weeks ago.

During the initial interview, Sekola had insisted that the cows belonged to his late grandfather who had kept them in South Africa for better pastures.

The police didn’t arrest him at that time because investigations were still in the early stages. Further investigations have however led the police to believe that the animals were stolen from South Africa.

But when they were ready for the arrest, Sekola could not be found at his home or on his phone.

Police say Sekola will be charged with unlawful possession and illegal importation of two cows from South Africa.

The National Stock Theft Coordinator, Senior Superintendent Mapesela Klaass, told thepost last night that they “have completed investigations but he (Sekola) is nowhere to be seen”.

“We cannot get him on his mobile phones,” S/Supt Klaass said, adding that the police have been “visiting his home but he is not there”.

“His family members are aware that we are looking for him,” he said.

S/Supt Klaass said they are continuing with their search and as soon as they find him, they are going to drag him to the courts.

He said the police suspect the cows were brought from South Africa to be slaughtered for Sekola’s grandfather’s funeral.

Police sources told thepost that one of the cows had new branding while another had nothing. Both had holes on the ears that signalled that they used to have ear tags.

Majara Molupe

Continue Reading

News

Magistrate saves WILSA boss

Published

on

A Maseru magistrate, Nthabiseng Moopisa, this week stayed the criminal prosecution of Advocate ’Mamosa Mohlabula who is accused of tax evasion, money laundering and corruption.

In her application Advocate Mohlabula, who is the director of Women and Law in Southern Africa (WILSA), said the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) should not charge her pending finalisation of her tax evasion case.

Advocate Mohlabula is out on bail after she was formally charged with tax evasion in July last year.

She told Magistrate Moopisa that the DPP, Advocate Hlalefang Motinyane, was wrong to have agreed with the Director General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences (DCEO) to bring charges against her.

“In my viewpoint, the DCEO cannot be heard to charge me in relation to matters already seized with this Honourable Court,” she said in an affidavit.

She also said there is a pending civil case in the High Court in which the DCEO’s abuse of power is referenced, saying the precise way the case is handled will depend “on the way an alleged offence comes to the light”.

“Before that pending case is finalised, DCEO has no jurisdiction to detail me to court over isolated phenomenon of tax evasion and or over grievances of former employees of WILSA,” she said.
Advocate Mohlabula was charged together with the WILSA’s chief accounting officer.

She argued that it was WILSA that was being investigated, not individuals, further saying that was “a significant safeguard that the DCEO was impartial from an objective viewpoint”.

“To exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect the DCEO returned the items it seized from WILSA,” she said.

“This was a realistic and practical step towards administering justice and to avoid premature embarrassment to the management of WILSA.”

She said the Board of Trustees of WILSA were sent briefing notes which in certain respects reflected that the DCEO returned the properties of WILSA without warning them that they were suspects.

“In any event, we proceeded to fashion our arguments before the High Court. There was, and could be, no evidence to back up the decision of the DCEO to apply for the search warrant,” she said.

Advocate Mohlabula said before they took the matter to the High Court, she cooperated with the DCEO and it conducted an inquiry into the alleged crimes.

“Now that the matter is pending before the High Court, there is no more reason for the DCEO to remand me before the pending cases are finalised,” she said.

Staff Reporter

Continue Reading

News

Mphaka barred from ABC deputy’s race

Published

on

THE All Basotho Convention (ABC) has barred former Government Secretary Moahloli Mphaka and three others from contesting for the deputy leader’s position at an elective conference set for this week.
The three are Kefeletsoe Mojela, Katleho Molelle, and Lekhetho Mosito.

Mosito was an MP who was appointed Defence Minister for a day and removed the following day during Dr Moeketsi Majoro’s premiership.
The elective conference is set to be held at the Leqele High School hall this weekend.

A circular from the ABC said the three did not qualify to enter the race because they had not held any positions in the party’s committees.

The decision to bar the three is reminiscent of the same tactics that saw former leader Thomas Thabane block Professor Nqosa Mahao from contesting for the party’s deputy leader’s position.
Professor Mahao subsequently walked away and formed the Basotho Action Party (BAP).

A weakened ABC has never recovered from that split.

Mphaka and his colleagues were vying for the deputy leader’s position until they were stopped in their tracks by the circular which was issued out on Monday this week.
Dr Pinkie Manamolela is the current deputy leader.

She was plucked from the women’s league to replace Dr Majoro who had resigned from the national executive committee after losing the leadership race to Nkaku Kabi in 2022.

There is a high chance that the four could drag the ABC to court to assert their right to contest. The legal wrangles will likely destabilise the party that is still smarting from a thorough thrashing in general elections held in October 2022.

Mphaka this week told thepost that he will challenge the decision to block him in the courts of law.
“They are crazy people,” Mphaka said.

“I will not allow this to happen,” he said.

“I have already instructed my lawyers to launch an urgent application in the High Court to challenge the decision before Friday this week.”

He complained that it was not clear why the party had decided to kick him out of the race after he spent a lot of time and resources campaigning.

Mphaka said the national executive committee “usually allows members to contest for positions without considering whether they were ever in the constituency committees or not”.

The contenders in the race are former Water Minister Samonyane Ntsekele, ex-Police MP Lehlohonolo Moramotse, former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Leshoboro Mohlajoa, and Maseru Star Taxi Association member Sekhonyana Mosenene.

A member of the national executive committee told thepost that “many of us support Mphaka and Kefeletsoe at all costs”.

“We were dismayed when we saw the circular removing the duo from the race,” he said.

He said many ABC members were rallying behind Mphaka because “he has been campaigning even before everyone could start”.

“They know he has lots of followers.”

He said it is unfair that Mosenene has been allowed to run but he has never held any position in any constituency except that he represented his taxi association in the ABC national executive committee.
“Why has he been allowed to contest yet he is just like Mphaka and Kefeletsoe?”

He complained that Sekhonyana, while representing taxi operators in the committee, was eventually made the deputy party spokesman despite not being in any constituency committee after ’Matebatso Doti resigned from the position.

“Mphaka was chosen by the party to lead the 2022 elections campaign teams and develop a party manifesto,” he said.

“He was allowed to do all that without being involved in any party structures.”

The party’s spokesman Montoeli Masoetsa declined to comment.

Dr Manamolela told thepost that “the decision was not made by the party’s national executive committee”.

“I do not want to talk much …but it is not true that the party’s NEC decided to remove Mphaka and Kefeletsoe”.

Kabi could not be reached for comment.

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending