News
‘More parties mean more voter choices’
Published
7 years agoon
By
The Post
THERE has been a clamour by political parties to raise the quota for party registration from the current minimum of 500 to 5 000 members. This comes in the wake of concerns by Basotho over the mushrooming of political parties in Lesotho. The thinking is that the IEC benchmarks for party registration are too low making it easy for parties to register.
Last week, thepost’s Rose Moremoholo spoke to the IEC’s deputy director of elections, Mphasa Mokhochane, on these and other matters.
In light of the mushrooming of political parties is it not time for the IEC to increase the minimum threshold required for a new political party to be registered with the IEC?
A political party may apply for registration with the electoral commission if it has a paid-up membership of at least 500 people. The discussions we had recently with political parties is that they had proposed that a threshold for registration be increased to 5 000.
But all the same these are randomly selected figures with no basis at all. A scientific approach on the registration of a political party would be that it should be based on a quota of votes for a seat in parliament. The approach would be comparing the strength of a political party with a single seat in parliament.
Are there any legal or democratic principles that will be broken if the quota is raised?
Each and every country has its own legislation to determine the quota for registration and there will be no violation of any standards if the law is amended to propose a new and more scientifically agreed quota for registering a political party.
Who makes the decision on the requirement of political parties to register with the IEC?
The IEC’s vision statement states: “working towards a strong participatory and democratic electoral process”. In order to achieve its vision, the IEC has involved the participation of stakeholders within its consultative committee structures, to make suggestions on any piece of legislation to be introduced or amended. Finally, parliament will amend the law as presented.
Is the ever increasing number of political parties in Lesotho not a matter of concern to the IEC?
Political parties register with the electoral commission for the purpose of contesting either national or local elections.
So if the number of parties contesting in elections increases then that is a good sign (that people are participating) in an electoral process.
I do not think it is wrong if the number of taxis operating on our roads increase but that will be an improvement to the transport of commuters.
Similarly, more registered political parties widen the scope for a voter when electing a political party. It would be wrong to limit the scope from which voters have to choose their candidates or political parties to say three or five political parties.
What would be the determining factor for limiting the scope to a certain number as an appropriate number of political parties? What would be the determining factor for limiting the scope to a certain number as an appropriate number of political parties to be registered with IEC?
How much is the IEC paying to a party for campaigns during a general election?
Campaign funding is determined on the basis of election results from the previous general election. Campaign funding for the 2012 general elections was calculated from the 2007 general elections and the 2015 general elections campaign funding was based on the 2012 general elections. Campaign funding is divided into two parts, namely an equity share, equivalent to 20 percent and an amount proportional to the votes a political party garnered from the previous general elections.
A political party gets an amount proportional to the votes it got in that general election.
How much has the IEC paid to political parties to campaign for general elections in the past three successive elections?
In the two past general elections an amount of M4 million had been allocated for campaign funding. This amount is shared among political parties.
How many parties have registered with the IEC?
Just for the month of January 2017, the IEC has managed to register two political parties. This brings the total number of registered parties to 26.
How many are not participating in the elections although they are registered?
In the run to the 2015 general elections there were 24 registered political parties but only 23 took part in those elections, with the exception of Sankatana Social Democracy (SSD).
How many parties have been deregistered with IEC and what were the reasons?
The following six political parties were deregistered in 2012: United Party, Social Democratic Party, New Lesotho Freedom Party, Sefate Democratic Congress, Kopanang Basotho Party, Lesotho Education Party and National Progressive Party.
The electoral commission may cancel the registration of a political party if the political party ceases to exist or no longer functions or if the political party does not follow its registration requirements like holding general elective conferences.
You may like

MOHLOMINYANE Tota, the only MP for the United for Change (UFC), has defied the party’s order to stop voting with the opposition in parliament.
Tota, the UFC’s deputy leader, told thepost this week that he will vote, guided by his own conscience, and not the party’s instructions.
His defiance comes after the party publicly chastised him for voting with the opposition in parliament.
A fightnight ago, Tota angered his party when he sided with the opposition to vote against the government’s motion to continue discussing the reforms’ Omnibus Bill despite that it was being challenged in the Constitutional Court.
The government however won with 57 votes against the opposition’s 50.
The UFC issued a statement reprimanding Tota for defying its decision to always vote with the government.
But Tota told thepost this week that he was unfazed by the party’s warning.
“I will continue to vote with the opposition where need be, and I will also vote with the government where need be,” Tota said.
He said he respects the party’s position but “I also have a right to follow my conscience”.
This, he added, is because “it is not mandatory for an MP to toe the party line even when his conscience does not allow it”.
He said whether he will vote with the government or the opposition will depend “on the issue on the table”.
He said his conscience would not allow him to vote with the government on the Omnibus Bill motion.
“It was wrong,” Tota said.
“I will do the same again given another chance.”
Tota’s response comes three days after the UFC issued a statement distancing itself from his stance in parliament.
The party said its national executive committee had an urgent meeting over the weekend to discuss Tota’s behaviour.
It said its position is to always support Prime Minister Sam Matekane’s coalition government.
“‘The issue has caused a lot of confusion in the party and among Basotho at large,” the statement reads.
The party also said Tota did not bother to inform the national executive committee about his decision so that he could get a new mandate.
“He did not even inform the committee before voting,” the statement reads.
“The national executive committee held an intensive meeting with Tota about the matter because the purpose of the party is to support the government,” it reads.
The UFC said where the government goes wrong “the party will continue to confront it with peace and not with a fight” (sic).
“We have confidence in the current government because it was voted in by Basotho.”
The UFC’s statement makes it clear that the party “will not support anything against the government”.
Nkheli Liphoto

THE plot to topple Prime Minister Sam Matekane thickened this week amid allegations of brazen vote-buying ahead of the opposition’s planned vote of no-confidence.
The opposition is said to be ready to push out Matekane when parliament reopens sometime in September. They accuse Matekane’s government of incompetence, nepotism, corruption and using the security forces to harass opposition MPs.
But as the lobbying and touting of MPs reaches fever pitch, there are now allegations of each side using bribes to secure votes crucial in the vote to remove the government.
Democratic Congress leader, Mathibeli Mokhothu, this week accused the government of bribing its MPs to defeat the motion against Matekane.
Mokhothu, who made the allegations at the opposition’s press conference yesterdday, did not give further details or names of those bribed and those bribing.
But on Monday, the Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) MP, Puseletso Lejone, told thepost that Mokhothu offered him a M2.2 million bribe to support the opposition’s motion to upend the government.
Lejone said Mokhothu made the offer at a secret meeting, attended by almost all opposition leaders on August 14, at Monyane Moleleki’s house in Qoatsaneng.
The Thaba Moea MP said the leaders claimed that 60 MPs were supporting the motion against Matekane and wanted his vote to make it 61.
“The money was to come directly from Mokhothu,” Lejone said.
“They asked me to provide them with my bank account so that they could transfer the money.”
Mokhuthu denied the allegations, saying he wondered if Lejone “was smoking socks”.
Lejone repeated the same allegations on the sidelines of yesterday’s press conference where Matekane assured Basotho that his government has enough numbers to fend off the opposition’s attempt to push him out.
He said apart from Moleleki and Mokhothu, other political leaders who attended the meeting were Lekhetho Rakuoane, Machesetsa Mofomobe, Nkaku Kabi, Professor Nqosa Mahao, Teboho Mojapela, Tefo Mapesela and Tšepo Lipholo.
He said the leaders gave him a document showing that six RFP MPs had pledged to support the vote of no confidence. Lejone however refused to name the RFP MPs, saying he still wants them to remain in the ruling party.
He said four MPs from parties in the RFP-led coalition had signed.
They are Mohlominyane Tota (UFC), Reverend Paul Masiu (BAENA), Mokoto Hloaele (AD) and Motlalepula Khahloe (MEC).
The deal, Lejone said, was that Mokhutho would become prime minister and be deputised by Dr Mahali Phamotse.
He said the RFP’s faction was going to be rewarded with 10 ministerial seats for their role in toppling Matekane.
Nearly all the political leaders mentioned by Lejone denied attending the meeting at Moleleki’s house.
“By the living God, I have never been in a meeting with that man (Lejone),” Mokhothu said, adding that Lejone’s allegations are “defamatory”.
Mahao said he last visited Moleleki’s house, which is up the road from his, 22 years ago. Mofomobe said Lejone is lying about the meeting because he wants to curry favour with Matekane, whom he had been criticising for months.
Mofomobe said all his meetings with Lejone were at the BNP Centre and their agenda was toppling Matekane.
“We were discussing his (Matekane) incapability to rule this country,” Mofomobe said.
Rakuoane and Mapesela said they have never been to Moleleki’s house.
So did Kabi who implied that Lejone could have smoked something intoxicating “to talk about a meeting that never happened”.
Lipholo, Rev Masiu, and Tota said they were not at that meeting while Moleleki said he had “no comment”.
Staff Reporter
News
Matekane abusing state agencies, says opposition
Published
1 week agoon
September 22, 2023By
The Post
THE opposition has accused the government of weaponising security agencies to harass and intimidate their MPs.
The accusations come as the opposition plots to push a vote of no confidence against Prime Minister Sam Matekane when parliament re-opens in September.
Opposition leaders told a press conference yesterday that the government has resorted to using the army and the police against its MPs because it is afraid of the motion.
Democratic Congress (DC) leader, Mathibeli Mokhothu, said the security bosses have been willing tools for the government because their bosses are desperate for Matekane to renew their employment contracts.
He was talking about Police Commissioner Holomo Molibeli, army boss Lieutenant General Mojalefa Letsoela and National Security Service (NSS) boss Pheello Ralenkoane.
“Employment contracts for the security agencies’ bosses are the ones causing these problems because the commanders end up working towards pleasing the government for their contract extension,” Mokhothu said.
He said the army has also started setting up roadblocks closer to parliament to search MPs. Mokhothu said the army searched Nkaku Kabi and Advocate Lebohang Maema KC at the parliament premises last week.
“The government is now bringing back the security agencies into party politics,” Mokhothu said.
“This was the first time the army entered the parliament premises to search members and other people there. It is an embarrassment.”
“The responsibility of our soldiers is to guard the borders and ensure security, not to enter politics or set up roadblocks on the parliament roads.”
“They are now running the country like a shop or a company.”
Basotho National Party leader, Machesetsa Mofomobe, alleged that Matekane had a meeting with the security bosses in Teya-teyaneng to discuss how they could use their institutions to clip the opposition’s wings.
“The LDF, LMPS and NSS boss’s contracts have expired, and now they are using the institution to get extensions,” Mofomobe said.
“The LDF and LMPS are doing this deliberately to protect the government.”
thepost could not independently verify this allegation.
Tefo Mapesela, the Basotho Progressive Party leader, said Matekane’s government is taking Lesotho back to 2014 when the army was wooed into politics.
He warned that officers who allow themselves to be used as pawns in political fights might find themselves in jail while their political handlers enjoy freedom.
He referred to Lieutenant General Tlali Kamoli who has been in remand prison for seven years as he faces charges of murder, attempted murder and treason.
Mapesela however said the opposition will not be intimidated because it is their democratic right to bring a motion of no confidence against the government.
“When there is time to enter a motion of no confidence it is time, it is written in the law, there is nothing wrong there,” Mapesela said.
“I once launched a motion of no confidence in the previous parliament, but I was never arrested or threatened.”
“We do not owe Matekane anything. When the time has come he has to go. We will lobby others as it is not a crime.”
The Basotho Action Party’s Nqosa Mahao criticised the police for issuing a press statement with political undertones.
In a controversial statement last week, Commissioner Molibeli said the police were aware that some MPs were coercing their colleagues to support their plot to topple the government.
Molibeli also said they were aware that such MPs were surrounding themselves with armed groups.
“Police warn those perpetrating these acts to stop immediately to avoid action that could be taken to protect the country,” Molibeli said.
Matekane made the same allegations at his press conference yesterday.
Professor Mahao said the statement shows that the police have now been entangled in politics.
“Every time parties experience internal problems the leaders conspire with the security agencies,” he said.
“The opposition leaders are now being harassed because the government wants to stop them from exercising their rights.”
The opposition’s charge sheet against Matekane
- Filling of statutory positions despite the reforms aiming to change the system.
- Corruption
- Nepotism
- Using security agencies to deter MPs from ousting Matekane.
- Job losses.
- Lack of job creation.
- Failure to fulfil campaign promises.
- Protecting mining companies’ interests at the expense of Basotho.
- Incompetence and lack of communication skills.
- Arrest of MPs by the police.
- Cherry-picking reforms that insulate his government.
Staff Reporter

MP defies party, backs opposition

Inside plot to oust Matekane

Matekane abusing state agencies, says opposition

‘Bikerboy’ appears in court again

Four BNP activists suspended

Why invest for the future

Fraudster to have day in court

PAC to grill civil servants over Covid funds

News in Brief

The beauty from Roma

‘Monster’ stepfather arrested for raping daughter

Who will speak on behalf of Basotho?

Has Matekane failed?

Mohlolo rescues point for LDF Ladies

Makepe quits Likuena duty

Reforms: time to change hearts and minds

Weekly Police Report

Professionalising education

The middle class have failed us

No peace plan, no economic recovery

We have lost our moral indignation

Coalition politics are bad for development

Academic leadership, curriculum and pedagogy

Mokeki’s road to stardom

DCEO raids PS’

Literature and reality

The ABC blew its chance

Bringing the spark back to schools

I made Matekane rich: Moleleki

Musician dumps ABC

Bofuma, boimana li nts’a bana likolong

BNP infighting

Mahao o seboko ka ho phahama hoa litheko

Contract Farming Launch

7,5 Million Dollars For Needy Children

Ba ahileng lipuleng ba falle ha nakoana

Ba ahileng lipuleng ba falle ha nakoana

Weekly Police Report

Mahao o re masholu a e ts’oareloe

‘Our Members Voted RFP’ Says Metsing

SENATE OPENS

Matekane’s 100 Days Plan

High Profile Cases in Limbo

130 Law Students Graduate From NUL

Metsing and Mochoboroane Case Postponed
ADVERTISEMENT
Trending
-
News1 month ago
Lerotholi students want charges dropped
-
Business1 month ago
LEC lights the way
-
News1 month ago
RFP rocked by death threats
-
Business1 month ago
Nedbank posts strong growth
-
Business1 month ago
Iconics Clothing bags big prize
-
News1 month ago
Police boss hit in pocket
-
News1 month ago
The ‘ear doctor’ driving change
-
News1 month ago
Child neglect cases on the rise