Connect with us

News

Ombudsman goes after DCEO boss

Published

on

MASERU – THE Ombudsman Leshele Thoahlane wants parliament to censure the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences (DCEO) boss Borotho Matsoso for refusing to implement his recommendation. Thoahlane also wants parliament to force Matsoso’s hand to comply with his decision.
In 2016 a police officer, Tau Letšaba, complained to the Ombudsman that Matsoso had deliberately sabotaged his application for the position of principal investigations officer in the anti-corruption unit.

Letšaba applied for the position when he was still on second-ment to the DCEO.
He told the Ombudsman that the DCEO management shifted goalposts to frustrate his appointment. In November 2016 Thoahlane found in Letšaba’s favour and ordered the DCEO to stop the recruitment process.

The Ombudsman also told the Matsoso that if he did not agree with his recommendations in the case he is free to apply for judicial review at the High Court. This was after the DCEO had said it did not agree with the recommendations. Yet according to Thoahlane’s eight-page report to Parliament, Matsoso went ahead to fill the post and has refused to comply with the recommendations for the past two years. Both Thoahlane and Matsoso are admitted advocates of the High Court.

The Ombudsman told Parliament that earlier in 2016 a position of Principal Investigations Officer at the DCEO was advertised. Confident that he met the requirements, Letšaba applied.
Letšaba alleged that he was called one day to the office of the Chief Investigations Officer where he was informed that the management was aware of his application “but regretted being unable to consider him for appointment due to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) existing between the police, the DCEO and the Lesotho Revenue Authority (LRA).
The MOU is meant to stop the organisations from ‘poaching’ each other’s employees.
That position was later filled.

But some months later a similar position was advertised. Letšaba asked the Chief Investigations Officer if he could be released back to the police so that he could apply for the post.
He was told he could apply without going back to the police “because releasing him would result in understaffing in the investigations section”.
The Chief Investigations Officer allegedly promised him that seniors from both the police and the DCEO would sort the matter out.
Letšaba claimed that after he complained about the MOU, Matsoso said he should apply.

He said his understanding was that Matsoso would find a way to bypass the MOU to hire him. The Ombudsman says after applying he was called to the DCEO’s human resources office where he was told that he had not been shortlisted because of the MOU. Letšaba allegedly asked for the copy of the MOU but was not given.
Matsoso told him the same when he asked him.

“The complainant was even further bewildered when (Matsoso) invited him to his office to tell him that not only the MOU but his age too had contributed towards his disqualification in being considered for short-listing,” the Ombudsman’s report said.
The advert for the position had stated that applicants should be aged between 25 and 40 years, have a B.Com (Accounting), social sciences degree or equivalent and two years’ experience in either taxation or financial investigation.

Alternatively applicants could have a diploma in accounting studies plus 10 years’ experience in the same field or investigation of white collar crime.
Letšaba had told the Ombudsman that he had been in the police service for over 20 years and had attended several workshops and courses on investigation of white collar crime among others.
“While he was above the required age as per the advert, the complainant said he was an already serving officer of the Government of Lesotho who had relevant qualifications on top of which, as has already been mentioned, was attached to DCEO and doing what appeared in the terms of reference for the position advertised,” the report reads.
“He felt the age restriction was but discriminatory, he ought to have been short-listed.”

Letšaba cited two of his fellow policemen who were employed by the DCEO while on attachment under the MOU.
The Ombudsman said he could not understand why the MOU became an issue for Letšaba when it was never raised when his colleagues were recruited.
“He felt that all these reasons were brought up by the DCEO management just to frustrate his application for reasons not known to him (but) best known to the said management.”
Matsoso’s response was that Letšaba was way above the 40 years of age contrary to the advert requirement and that he only had a year on attachment at the DCEO and therefore did not have two years’ experience in white collar crime investigation.

He said even if he could be released back to the police so that he could apply, he still could not qualify because according to the MOU “he would not have left the agency of attachment for a period not less than six months”. “(Matsoso) vehemently denied the existence of any promise whatsoever either by himself or (Chief Investigations Officers) to the effect that the complainant’s application would be considered,” the Ombudsman said.

However, Thoahlane’s investigations revealed that all applicants for the position were police officers “junior to the complainant in rank and experience”.

Staff Reporter

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Lawyer in trouble

Published

on

A local lawyer, Advocate Molefi Makase, is in soup after he flew into a rage, insulting his wife and smashing her phone at a police station.

It was not possible to establish why Adv Makase was so mad at his wife. He is now expected to appear before the Tšifa-li-Mali Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday.

Earlier on Tuesday, he was released from custody on free bail on condition that he attends remands.

Magistrate Mpotla Koaesa granted Advocate Makase bail after his lawyer, Advocate Kefuoe Machaile, pleaded that he had to appear for his clients in the Court of Appeal.

Advocate Makase is facing two charges of breaching peace and malicious damage to property.

According to the charge sheet, on October 5, 2023, within the precincts of the Leribe Police Station, Advocate Makase allegedly used obscene, threatening, or insulting language or behaviour, or acted with an intent to incite a breach of the peace.

The prosecution alleges that the lawyer shouted at his wife, ’Mamahao Makase, and damaged her Huawei Y5P cell phone “with an intention to cause harm” right at police station.

During his initial appearance before Magistrate Koaesa, Advocate Makase expressed remorse for his actions and sought the court’s leniency, pleading for bail due to an impending appearance in the Court of Appeal.

His lawyer, Advocate Machaile, informed the court that an arrangement had been made with the police to secure his release the following day, as he had spent a night in detention.

Advocate Machaile recounted his efforts to persuade the police to release him on the day of his arrest.

He noted that the police had assured them of his release the following day, which indeed came to fruition.

Following his release, he was instructed to present himself before the court, which he dutifully complied with.

Advocate Machaile underscored Advocate Makase’s standing as a recognised legal practitioner in the court.

Notably, he was scheduled to appear in the Court of Appeal but had to reschedule his commitment later in the day to accommodate his court appearance.

Advocate Machaile asserted that Advocate Makase presented no flight risk, as he resides in Hlotse with his family and has no motive to evade his legal obligations.

He respectfully petitioned the court for his release on bail, emphasising that he had demonstrated his ability to adhere to the court’s conditions.

The Crown Counsel, Advocate Taelo Sello, expressed no objection to the bail application, acknowledging that the accused had a forthcoming matter in the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, the court granted Advocate Makase bail without any financial conditions, with the stipulation that he must not tamper with state witnesses and must fully participate in the trial process until its conclusion.

’Malimpho Majoro

Continue Reading

News

Trio in court for killing ‘witches’

Published

on

THREE elderly women were all stabbed to death with a spear during a deadly night after they were accused of being witches.

Three suspects, all from Ha-Kholoko village in Roma, appeared in the High Court this week facing a charge of murder.
They are Jakobo Mofolo, Oele Poto, and Pakiso Lehoko.

They accused the elderly women of bewitching one of Poto’s relative who had died.

The stunning details of the murder was unravelled in court this week, thanks to Tlhaba Bochabela, 32, who is the crown witness.

Bochabela told High Court judge, Justice ’Mabatšoeneng Hlaele, last week that he had been invited to become part of the murder group but chickened out at the last minute.

Bochabela said in March 2020, he was invited by Rethabile Poto to come to his house in the evening.

He said when he went there, he found Mofolo, Poto, and Lehoko already at the house. There were two other men who he did not identify.

“I was told that the very same night we were going to do some task, we were going to kill some people,” Bochabela told Justice Hlaele.

He said he asked which people were going to be killed and was told that they were ’Malekhooa Maeka, ’Mathlokomelo Poto, ’Mampolokeng Masasa.

They said the three women had successfully bewitched Rethabile Poto’s uncle leading to his death.

Bochabela said after he was told of this plot, he agreed to implement it but requested that he be allowed to go to his house to fetch his weapon.

He said Lehoko was however suspicious that he was withdrawing from the plot and mockingly said “let this woman go and sleep, we can see that he is afraid and is running away”.

Bochabela said the only person he told the truth to, that he was indeed going to his home to sleep instead of going to murder the three elderly women was Mofolo who also told him that he was leaving too.

He said he told Mofolo that he felt uncomfortable with the murder plan.

Bochabela said he left and when he arrived at his place he told his wife all about the meeting and the plot to kill the women.

He said his wife commended him for his decision to pull out.

“I told my wife to lock the door and not respond to anyone that would come knocking looking for me,” Bochabela said.

He said later in the night, Rethabile Poto arrived at his place and called him out but they did not respond until he left.

Bochabela said in the morning they discovered that indeed the men had carried out their mission.

The village chief of Ha-Kholoko, Chief Thabang Lehoko, told Justice Hlaele that it was between 11 pm and 12 midnight when he received a phone call from one Pakiso Maseka who is a neighbour to one of the murdered women.

Chief Lehoko said Maseka told him to rush to ’Mampolokeng Masasa’s place to see what evil had been done to her.

“I rushed to Masasa’s place and on arrival I found Pakiso in the company of Moitheri Masasa,” Chief Lehoko said.

He said he found the old lady on the bed, naked with her legs spread wide.

“I was embarrassed by the sight of the old lady in that state, naked and covered in blood,” the chief said.

He said he went out and asked Maseka what had happened but Maseka referred him to Moitheri Masasa.

Chief Lehoko said Masasa told him that there were people with spears who had threatened to kill him if he came out of the house.

He said Maseka said he knew that Masasa’s neighbour, ’Malekhooa Maeka, was a light sleeper and she could have heard something.

The chief then sent one Patrick Lehoko to Maeka’s house to check if she had heard anything but Patrick came back saying Maeka was not at her house.

“I immediately stood up and went to ’Malekhooa’s place,” Chief Lehoko said.

He said when he arrived, he knocked at her door but there was no response so he kicked the door open, went in and called out ’Malekhooa Maeka by name.

Chief Lehoko said he then lit his phone and saw her lying in bed covered in blankets.

He said he then went closer to her and shook her but she was heavy.

Chief Lehoko said he tried to shake her again one last time while still calling her out but he touched blood.

He said he immediately left and went back to tell others that Maeka seemed to be dead too.

“I decided to go and buy airtime from the nearest shop which I had passed through near ’Matlhokomelo Poto’s home.”

He said on his way he met one Sebata Poto who asked him who he was.

Chief Lehoko said he only replied by telling him that the two women, Masasa and Maeka, had been murdered.

He said Sebata Poto told him that “’Matlhokomelo has been stabbed with a spear too”.

Chief Lehoko said he rushed to ’Matlhokomelo Poto’s house where he found her seated in the middle of the house supported by her children with blood oozing from her chest, gasping for air.

“I stepped out and went to get airtime, but I found her dead when I returned from the shop,” the chief said.

The case continues.

Tholoana Lesenya

Continue Reading

News

Opposition fights back

Published

on

THE opposition is launching a nasty fightback after Prime Minister Sam Matekane defanged their no-confidence motion by roping in new partners to firm up his government.

Matekane’s surprise deal with the Basotho Action Party (BAP) has trimmed the opposition’s support in parliament and thrown their motion into doubt.

But the opposition has now filed another motion that seeks to get Matekane and his MPs disqualified from parliament on account that they were elected when they had business interests with the government.

The motion is based on section 59 of the constitution which disqualifies a person from being sworn-in as an MP if they have “any such interest in any such government contract as may be so prescribed”.

Section 59 (6) describes a government contract as “any contract made with the Government of Lesotho or with a department of that Government or with an officer of that Government contracting as such”.

Prime Minister Matekane’s Matekane Group of Companies (MGC) has a history of winning road construction tenders. Other Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) MPs, most of whom were in business, had had business dealings with the government.

It is however not clear if the MPs were still doing business with the government at the time of their swearing-in.
Matekane’s MGC Park is housing the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), which is a government institution established by the constitution, getting its funds from the consolidated funds.

The motion was brought by the Popular Front for Democracy (PFD) leader Lekhetho Rakuoane who is a key figure in the opposition’s bid to topple Matekane.

The motion appears to be a long shot but should be taken in the context of a political game that has become nasty.
Advocate Rakuoane said the IEC’s tenancy at the MGC is one of their targets.

“The IEC is one of the government departments,” Rakuoane said.

“It is currently unethical that it has hired the prime minister’s building.”

“But after the motion, he will have to cut ties with the IEC or he will be kicked out of parliament.”

The Democratic Congress (DC) leader, Mathibeli Mokhothu, said although the IEC is an independent body, it can still be regarded as part of the government because it gets its funding from the consolidated fund.

The Basotho Covenant Movement (BCM)’s Reverend Tšepo Lipholo, who seconded the motion, said the Matekane-led government “is dominated by tenderpreneurs who have been doing business with the government since a long time ago”.

“Now they have joined politics, they must not do business with the government,” Lipholo said.

He said some of the MPs in the ruling parties are still doing business with the government despite their promises before the election to stop doing that.

“Those who will not abide by the law should be disqualified as MPs,” Lipholo said.

“Basotho’s small businesses are collapsing day-by-day, yet people who are in power continue to take tenders for themselves.”

He applauded the Abia constituency MP Thuso Makhalanyane, who was recently expelled from Matekane’s RFP for rebellion because he withdrew his car from government engagement after he was sworn in as an MP.

“He set a good example by withdrawing his vehicle where it was hired by the government,” Lipholo said.

Rakuoane said during the past 30 years after Lesotho’s return to democratic rule, section 59 of the constitution has not been attended to even when it was clear that some MPs had business dealings with the government.

“This section stops you from entering parliament when doing business with the government. Those who are already members will have to leave,” he said.

Rakuoane said they are waiting for Speaker Tlohang Sekhamane to sign the motion so that the parliament business committee can set a date for its debate.

“The law will also serve to assist ordinary Basotho businesses as they will not compete with the executive,” he said.

“There are many Basotho businesses in business these MPs are in. They must get those tenders instead.”

The new motion comes barely a week after a court application aimed at disqualifying Mokhothu.

The government-sponsored application sought the Constitutional Court to declare Mokhothu unfit to be prime minister because he was convicted of fraud in 2007.

Mokhothu has been suggested as Matekane’s replacement should the motion of no confidence pass in parliament.

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending