Connect with us


Phoofolo warns Majoro



MASERU-ATTORNEY General Haae Phoofolo has warned Prime Minister Moeketsi Majoro that he has crossed the red line by sending him on terminal leave pending the expiry of his contract.

Last week, Majoro instructed Advocate Phoofolo to go on leave until February when his three-year contract ends. He said he wants to look for a new Attorney General early in order to align the office with his ambitions as the Prime Minister.
He appeared to insinuate that Advocate Phoofolo, 73, was now too old to handle the increased “workloads to be generated by the rapid implementation of policies as well as the on-going reform process”.

Advocate Phoofolo seemed to have accepted the Prime Minister’s decision and sounded magnanimous in an interview with a local weekly. The newspaper painted a picture of a contented man, quoting him as saying he will spend more time with his wife and grandchildren.

But thepost can now reveal that Advocate Phoofolo is not going quietly and the government might be stuck with him until the end of his contract.
That much is clear in a letter Advocate Phoofolo’s lawyers wrote to the Prime Minister on September 17.
Mei & Mei, the lawyers, told the Prime Minister he doesn’t have the authority to send Advocate Phoofolo on terminal leave. That authority, they argued, is vested in the King who appoints the Attorney General under section 140 of the constitution.

This, the lawyers said, meant that Advocate Phoofolo’s appointment, benefits and leave can only be handled by the King.
“We wish to draw your attention to the fact that, and hereby record that you have no powers at law to suspend and/or place the Attorney General on forced leave as you purported to do in view of the fact that your office is not the appointing authority in terms of section 140 (1) of the Constitution,” said Mei & Mei.

They said that section, together with the Office of the Attorney General Act of 1994, did not “envisage that the Prime Minister could invoke the powers which have not been bestowed upon him”.
They added that the import of Majoro’s letter was that he was suspending or forcing Advocate Phoofolo to go on terminal leave simply because “he is not and would not be competent enough to deal with the challenges facing the office”.

The letter however ends on an ambiguous note, saying Advocate Phoofolo “reconsidered his position and decided that no practical purpose will be served by engaging in legal action and strictly reserve his rights in this regard”.

That could be read to mean Advocate Phoofolo is either silently walking away or keeping the option of a legal route open.
But Advocate Phoofolo was clear about his intentions in an interview with thepost this week.

He said he is not accepting the Prime Minister’s decision because it’s illegal.
“I am not refusing to leave but just saying it should be done according to the law. As things stand, the decision to remove me is illegal because it was done by the Prime Minister and not the King,” he said.

“What I don’t accept is the illegality of it all. If you deal with me properly then I have no reason to bother you but if you don’t follow the law then I will have no option but to seek redress.”
“I don’t like to start competing for jobs with small boys. I am too old for that. I am only concerned about the illegality. As a lawyer, I feel that it will not appear right if I go and leave this illegality standing as it is.”
“That will set a bad precedent. I don’t want to be the AG that accepted an illegality. It will give the impression that I was advising the government wrongly and accepted an illegal decision implemented against me.”
“In other words, I am warning him (the Prime Minister) that he has crossed the red line,” he said.

“As it is now I don’t accept his decision. That position is based on principle, not a reluctance to leave office.”
Phoofolo, who was admitted as an advocate in 1976 and started his private practice in 1990, appears to have fallen out with his principals in government.

A few weeks ago, Justice Minister Nqosa Mahao criticised the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), to which Advocate Phoofolo is a member, for advising the king to appoint some five candidates as High Court judges.
Mahao described the decision as “politically motivated”, accusing Advocate Phoofolo and Acting Chief Justice Maseforo Mahase of surreptitiously making the recommendations to the King without the input of two other JSC members.

The King is said to have refused to make the appointments but the controversy lingered on, with media reports suggesting that the Cabinet recently hauled Advocate Phoofolo to the coals for his part in the decision.
Advocate Phoofolo however told thepost that he “doesn’t regret the decision because the JSC followed the law to the letter”.
“If someone is not happy with that decision they can approach the courts because that is the right thing to do. What the JSC did has been the practice since 1993 when we had this new constitution.”

Apart from the dispute over judges, Professor Mahao also seems to have had another gripe with Advocate Phoofolo.
Speaking on a local radio station, Professor Mahao alleged that the Attorney General had failed to provide a legal opinion on how to sort out the mess at the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC).

A caller then asked the minister why the government was keeping the Attorney General if he doesn’t take orders, to which he said the matter was being handled administratively.
A few days later Advocate Phoofolo was shown the door.
Advocate Phoofolo also appears to have ruffled feathers within the All Basotho Convention (ABC)’s national executive committee, some of whose members are said to be nursing a grudge against him for appearing to be siding with former Prime Minister Thomas Thabane.

Shakeman Mugari

Continue Reading


Lawyer in trouble



A local lawyer, Advocate Molefi Makase, is in soup after he flew into a rage, insulting his wife and smashing her phone at a police station.

It was not possible to establish why Adv Makase was so mad at his wife. He is now expected to appear before the Tšifa-li-Mali Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday.

Earlier on Tuesday, he was released from custody on free bail on condition that he attends remands.

Magistrate Mpotla Koaesa granted Advocate Makase bail after his lawyer, Advocate Kefuoe Machaile, pleaded that he had to appear for his clients in the Court of Appeal.

Advocate Makase is facing two charges of breaching peace and malicious damage to property.

According to the charge sheet, on October 5, 2023, within the precincts of the Leribe Police Station, Advocate Makase allegedly used obscene, threatening, or insulting language or behaviour, or acted with an intent to incite a breach of the peace.

The prosecution alleges that the lawyer shouted at his wife, ’Mamahao Makase, and damaged her Huawei Y5P cell phone “with an intention to cause harm” right at police station.

During his initial appearance before Magistrate Koaesa, Advocate Makase expressed remorse for his actions and sought the court’s leniency, pleading for bail due to an impending appearance in the Court of Appeal.

His lawyer, Advocate Machaile, informed the court that an arrangement had been made with the police to secure his release the following day, as he had spent a night in detention.

Advocate Machaile recounted his efforts to persuade the police to release him on the day of his arrest.

He noted that the police had assured them of his release the following day, which indeed came to fruition.

Following his release, he was instructed to present himself before the court, which he dutifully complied with.

Advocate Machaile underscored Advocate Makase’s standing as a recognised legal practitioner in the court.

Notably, he was scheduled to appear in the Court of Appeal but had to reschedule his commitment later in the day to accommodate his court appearance.

Advocate Machaile asserted that Advocate Makase presented no flight risk, as he resides in Hlotse with his family and has no motive to evade his legal obligations.

He respectfully petitioned the court for his release on bail, emphasising that he had demonstrated his ability to adhere to the court’s conditions.

The Crown Counsel, Advocate Taelo Sello, expressed no objection to the bail application, acknowledging that the accused had a forthcoming matter in the Court of Appeal.

Consequently, the court granted Advocate Makase bail without any financial conditions, with the stipulation that he must not tamper with state witnesses and must fully participate in the trial process until its conclusion.

’Malimpho Majoro

Continue Reading


Trio in court for killing ‘witches’



THREE elderly women were all stabbed to death with a spear during a deadly night after they were accused of being witches.

Three suspects, all from Ha-Kholoko village in Roma, appeared in the High Court this week facing a charge of murder.
They are Jakobo Mofolo, Oele Poto, and Pakiso Lehoko.

They accused the elderly women of bewitching one of Poto’s relative who had died.

The stunning details of the murder was unravelled in court this week, thanks to Tlhaba Bochabela, 32, who is the crown witness.

Bochabela told High Court judge, Justice ’Mabatšoeneng Hlaele, last week that he had been invited to become part of the murder group but chickened out at the last minute.

Bochabela said in March 2020, he was invited by Rethabile Poto to come to his house in the evening.

He said when he went there, he found Mofolo, Poto, and Lehoko already at the house. There were two other men who he did not identify.

“I was told that the very same night we were going to do some task, we were going to kill some people,” Bochabela told Justice Hlaele.

He said he asked which people were going to be killed and was told that they were ’Malekhooa Maeka, ’Mathlokomelo Poto, ’Mampolokeng Masasa.

They said the three women had successfully bewitched Rethabile Poto’s uncle leading to his death.

Bochabela said after he was told of this plot, he agreed to implement it but requested that he be allowed to go to his house to fetch his weapon.

He said Lehoko was however suspicious that he was withdrawing from the plot and mockingly said “let this woman go and sleep, we can see that he is afraid and is running away”.

Bochabela said the only person he told the truth to, that he was indeed going to his home to sleep instead of going to murder the three elderly women was Mofolo who also told him that he was leaving too.

He said he told Mofolo that he felt uncomfortable with the murder plan.

Bochabela said he left and when he arrived at his place he told his wife all about the meeting and the plot to kill the women.

He said his wife commended him for his decision to pull out.

“I told my wife to lock the door and not respond to anyone that would come knocking looking for me,” Bochabela said.

He said later in the night, Rethabile Poto arrived at his place and called him out but they did not respond until he left.

Bochabela said in the morning they discovered that indeed the men had carried out their mission.

The village chief of Ha-Kholoko, Chief Thabang Lehoko, told Justice Hlaele that it was between 11 pm and 12 midnight when he received a phone call from one Pakiso Maseka who is a neighbour to one of the murdered women.

Chief Lehoko said Maseka told him to rush to ’Mampolokeng Masasa’s place to see what evil had been done to her.

“I rushed to Masasa’s place and on arrival I found Pakiso in the company of Moitheri Masasa,” Chief Lehoko said.

He said he found the old lady on the bed, naked with her legs spread wide.

“I was embarrassed by the sight of the old lady in that state, naked and covered in blood,” the chief said.

He said he went out and asked Maseka what had happened but Maseka referred him to Moitheri Masasa.

Chief Lehoko said Masasa told him that there were people with spears who had threatened to kill him if he came out of the house.

He said Maseka said he knew that Masasa’s neighbour, ’Malekhooa Maeka, was a light sleeper and she could have heard something.

The chief then sent one Patrick Lehoko to Maeka’s house to check if she had heard anything but Patrick came back saying Maeka was not at her house.

“I immediately stood up and went to ’Malekhooa’s place,” Chief Lehoko said.

He said when he arrived, he knocked at her door but there was no response so he kicked the door open, went in and called out ’Malekhooa Maeka by name.

Chief Lehoko said he then lit his phone and saw her lying in bed covered in blankets.

He said he then went closer to her and shook her but she was heavy.

Chief Lehoko said he tried to shake her again one last time while still calling her out but he touched blood.

He said he immediately left and went back to tell others that Maeka seemed to be dead too.

“I decided to go and buy airtime from the nearest shop which I had passed through near ’Matlhokomelo Poto’s home.”

He said on his way he met one Sebata Poto who asked him who he was.

Chief Lehoko said he only replied by telling him that the two women, Masasa and Maeka, had been murdered.

He said Sebata Poto told him that “’Matlhokomelo has been stabbed with a spear too”.

Chief Lehoko said he rushed to ’Matlhokomelo Poto’s house where he found her seated in the middle of the house supported by her children with blood oozing from her chest, gasping for air.

“I stepped out and went to get airtime, but I found her dead when I returned from the shop,” the chief said.

The case continues.

Tholoana Lesenya

Continue Reading


Opposition fights back



THE opposition is launching a nasty fightback after Prime Minister Sam Matekane defanged their no-confidence motion by roping in new partners to firm up his government.

Matekane’s surprise deal with the Basotho Action Party (BAP) has trimmed the opposition’s support in parliament and thrown their motion into doubt.

But the opposition has now filed another motion that seeks to get Matekane and his MPs disqualified from parliament on account that they were elected when they had business interests with the government.

The motion is based on section 59 of the constitution which disqualifies a person from being sworn-in as an MP if they have “any such interest in any such government contract as may be so prescribed”.

Section 59 (6) describes a government contract as “any contract made with the Government of Lesotho or with a department of that Government or with an officer of that Government contracting as such”.

Prime Minister Matekane’s Matekane Group of Companies (MGC) has a history of winning road construction tenders. Other Revolution for Prosperity (RFP) MPs, most of whom were in business, had had business dealings with the government.

It is however not clear if the MPs were still doing business with the government at the time of their swearing-in.
Matekane’s MGC Park is housing the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), which is a government institution established by the constitution, getting its funds from the consolidated funds.

The motion was brought by the Popular Front for Democracy (PFD) leader Lekhetho Rakuoane who is a key figure in the opposition’s bid to topple Matekane.

The motion appears to be a long shot but should be taken in the context of a political game that has become nasty.
Advocate Rakuoane said the IEC’s tenancy at the MGC is one of their targets.

“The IEC is one of the government departments,” Rakuoane said.

“It is currently unethical that it has hired the prime minister’s building.”

“But after the motion, he will have to cut ties with the IEC or he will be kicked out of parliament.”

The Democratic Congress (DC) leader, Mathibeli Mokhothu, said although the IEC is an independent body, it can still be regarded as part of the government because it gets its funding from the consolidated fund.

The Basotho Covenant Movement (BCM)’s Reverend Tšepo Lipholo, who seconded the motion, said the Matekane-led government “is dominated by tenderpreneurs who have been doing business with the government since a long time ago”.

“Now they have joined politics, they must not do business with the government,” Lipholo said.

He said some of the MPs in the ruling parties are still doing business with the government despite their promises before the election to stop doing that.

“Those who will not abide by the law should be disqualified as MPs,” Lipholo said.

“Basotho’s small businesses are collapsing day-by-day, yet people who are in power continue to take tenders for themselves.”

He applauded the Abia constituency MP Thuso Makhalanyane, who was recently expelled from Matekane’s RFP for rebellion because he withdrew his car from government engagement after he was sworn in as an MP.

“He set a good example by withdrawing his vehicle where it was hired by the government,” Lipholo said.

Rakuoane said during the past 30 years after Lesotho’s return to democratic rule, section 59 of the constitution has not been attended to even when it was clear that some MPs had business dealings with the government.

“This section stops you from entering parliament when doing business with the government. Those who are already members will have to leave,” he said.

Rakuoane said they are waiting for Speaker Tlohang Sekhamane to sign the motion so that the parliament business committee can set a date for its debate.

“The law will also serve to assist ordinary Basotho businesses as they will not compete with the executive,” he said.

“There are many Basotho businesses in business these MPs are in. They must get those tenders instead.”

The new motion comes barely a week after a court application aimed at disqualifying Mokhothu.

The government-sponsored application sought the Constitutional Court to declare Mokhothu unfit to be prime minister because he was convicted of fraud in 2007.

Mokhothu has been suggested as Matekane’s replacement should the motion of no confidence pass in parliament.

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading