News
Sorting one square inch at a time
Published
7 years agoon
By
The Post
MASERU – FORMED in 2011, the Land Administration Authority (LAA) is probably one of the most misunderstood organisations in the country. Not that its mandate is opaque or that it has not explained itself clearly. It’s just that some perceptions, borne out of ignorance, have refused to wash away. Take, for instance, the persistent misconception perception that the LAA allocates land. Or the ease with which people quickly blame the LAA when a land transaction goes sour. Things are slowly changing, though, as more people begin to understand why the LAA was established.
Those who have been assisted by the LAA say it’s far more efficient and transparent than the department it replaced. This week thepost’s Lemohang Rakotsoane had a long chat with LAA director general and chief executive Mahashe Chaka over a wide range of issues. She started by asking him about the purpose of the LAA’s recent meeting with a World Bank team?
The World Bank’s land sector team was here to see results of the land reform Lesotho implemented under the first compact of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). The first compact of the MCC had a land administration reform project. The MCC tasked the World Bank to look at the land sector and the progress achieved by the first compact. The team looked at the impact of the land administration reform on the lives of the people.
What did they find?
Lesotho is a beacon in Africa in that the land reform was followed by an institutional reform which is LAA. Countries like Zambia, Malawi and Tanzania are trying to get funding from MCC. One of the conditions is that they have to get their land sector right. We also had a few moments with a chief executive of a local commercial bank who gave an outlook of the overall banking sector.
He mentioned that since the establishment of LAA the lending book of the banking sector had increased in terms of mortgages as people submit their land as collateral through registered title deed which is a lease.
What have been the successes of the initiative thus far?
From the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business report you can see Lesotho’s rankings in terms of registering property. We are still topping other countries in SADC. Our meeting also discussed our dispute resolution mechanisms which are clear. As LAA we mediate and conciliate.
We mediate and issue a form that is used as the basis when they go to the land courts or the High Court. We also focus on vulnerable groups and women. The enforcement of women’s land holding rights is now sitting at 74 percent as a result of the LAA enforcing the existing laws.
It used to be a problem for women to hold land rights despite the fact that we passed a law that recognised women land rights in 2006. That law applied retrospectively. That is an important point because laws are rarely applied retrospectively.
The LAA replaced a government department. How difficult was it to manage the relationship during the take-over?
Divorce is messy and this one was no different. The issue was that the Lands Surveys and Physical Planning (LSPP) would wait for you to transact and then tell you the laws after. And that was tricky because unless you had an issue with your lease or you were transacting you would not know the laws that affected you.
They would not even enforce laws, especially the one that deals with women’s right to own land.
What is the next step on the LAA’s agenda?
We have to integrate our processes to make them as high-tech as possible. We can no longer afford to have a lot of paper work as there are storage issues. Putting things in a digital format requires funding and we are already working on one such project. Soon we will launch our land identification system whereby all land records will be kept under one number.
This will enable the public to digitally interact with the authority. We hope it will boost the economy because foreign investors will be able to look at how to do business in terms of land activities. They don’t need to come here to check.
We are working with the ministry and our councils. This will also go a long way because they will be able to send their work digitally to us and we keep those records. We are currently talking to utility institutions, especially the Lesotho Communications Authority (LCA).
Spatial Data like where the electricity lines, tunnels and sewer lines are laid need to be kept digitally for all developers. This will enable the local councils to know where everything is when they develop infrastructure. All councils need to have a development plan that clearly shows where clinics, cemetery and schools will be.
How difficult was it to consolidate all this information?
As one of the first employees of the authority I experienced the difficulty first hand. When we were here together with our counterparts in the department of LSSP it was the most difficult thing to do in terms of human resources. Remember work has to be done by human resource first.
I was responsible for getting the workforce and negotiating with others to leave. It was very difficult. First we had to concentrate on creating a conducive working environment. Government had said some LSPP employees would be moved to offices in other ministries.
It had also pledged to create the LAA as an institution to get the reform in place here. We had to build relations so people understand this is for the good of the country. One of the operational challenges was that our land tenure security system is lease hold.
You have to appreciate the difference between the lease hold and free hold because that’s fundamental. The Constitution says all land in Lesotho belongs to Basotho and is held in trust by the king. That is the premise of our land and it has been there since 1906.
How huge is the number of land dispute cases?
We cannot quantify it as we only know when they come for mediation. Remember there are different types of disputes. The common one is the dispute of right but there are also disputes of inheritance and boundaries.
People like moving their boundaries even when they know very well where their plots end. With the dispute of right it continues and we don’t know the quantification because some people refuse to come for mediation.
We get reports on cases done by the courts but those are only criminal activities. Where it is dispute of right, boundary and inheritance but there is no criminal activity we do not get the reports. We only know what we have mediated but it is not a true reflection of the whole picture.
We are a land records institution. A land record starts with a land survey which is usually referred to as a Cadastral which refers to boundaries. Coordinates of the polygons come as a result of formal land survey.
The survey generates a number from the Cadastral Registry. The parcel of a land is identified by a number. People always believe that when you come to LAA you can mention your name.
They fail to understand that the records are kept in accordance with the Cadastral number which is followed by the plot number that is kept by the Cadastral Registry. The problem is that the LSPP didn’t do a good job in keeping those records in chronological order.
To get the land records in a chronological order was a big task. We have since made the LAA a service oriented organisation. We have reduced the number of days it takes to register a property and get a lease. These are proven milestones the LAA has achieved.
We have managed to know in terms of our leasehold system where every lease holder is liable to pay ground rent. All commercial companies pay ground rent and residential people apply for an exemption in their primary residence ONLY.
You are liable to pay ground rent depending on the use of your land and land rights.
What other challenges did the LAA face in trying to sort out problems by the old order?
Back then no one used to issue people with bills. Our counterparts did not issue bills. When you came to transact they told you your bill from the very first day you acquired a lease and it was a hefty bill. The biggest change is that we now issue bills annually to those who are supposed to pay ground rent.
The business community has complied and is able to budget unlike in the past where they used to be in a lot of arrears. And they had to budget so as to clear the arrears and they have done well.
Another challenge was that some people had paid and had the receipts but in our records they were not cleared and most customers proved us wrong.
What causes multiple land ownership and how do you deal with it?
That is caused by the lack of record keeping by the allocating authorities. LAA does not allocate land, the allocating authorities and the councils are responsible but they do not keep proper records.
As a result, they sometimes give one piece of land to anyone who comes. There is also no proper handover between staff. The most evident is the affidavit by the chief.
It is a problem because chiefs do not keep those records and there is no succession of work done by the chief and his son or wife.
That is why they allocate multiple people to a single piece of land and those are the land troubles that continue to happen up to this day. How do we deal with it?
Once a plot has been allocated and those rights are registered it means that it will be surveyed. That is where we get rid of those problems because by the time you come you will find that we have already assigned that plot a particular number.
Those land rights have to be surveyed by practising land surveyors who give it a particular plot number. If there is an existing number on that plot you will be told and therefore cannot be issued a second number.
The coordinates of a plot cannot be replicated all over the world because we use the same satellite throughout the world. The only problem that comes out of that is human error that is on the side of the authorities. After doing the land survey they do not update the digital Cadastral database.
If you do not update that after the survey it means that the plot number is not on the digital Cadastral database and on face value it looks vacant.
Do you think that we can correct Lesotho in terms of planning?
Yes we can. We already have an enabling legislation and it is clear, the Town and Country Planning Act 1980.
We also have assistant physical planners at the councils and they have to assist with physical planning, so we need to have the development plans per council. As long as we can get our civil servants to work, we can achieve that.
Staff Reporter
You may like
MASERU
KNORX Molelle’s appointment as the Director General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences (DCEO) in February 2023 could have been illegal.
The Law Society of Lesotho has told Prime Minister Sam Matekane that Molelle was appointed without being admitted as a legal practitioner in Lesotho, as required by law.
The society claims the information came from a whistleblower on January 2 and was corroborated by its roll of legal practitioners in Lesotho.
The society says the appointment violates section 4 of the Prevention of Corruption and Economic Offences Act 1999 which states that a person shall not be appointed as the DCEO director general unless they have been admitted as a legal practitioner in terms of the Legal Practitioners Act.
In the letter, Advocate Ithabeleng Phamotse, the society’s secretary, tells Matekane that this requirement “is not a mere procedural formality but a substantive qualification essential to the lawful appointment of the Director General”.
“The absence of such qualification fatally impairs the appointment ab initio, rendering it null and void from the outset,” Advocate Phamotse says in the letter written on Tuesday.
The society argues that if left unaddressed the illegality undermines the credibility, effectiveness and legality of the DCEO’s operations and exposes the kingdom to serious risks, including challenges to the lawfulness of decisions and actions made by Molelle.
“Should it be confirmed that the appointment was made in contravention of the mandatory legal requirements,” Advocate Phamotse said, “we respectfully urge you to take immediate corrective action to rectify this glaring irregularity”.
Advocate Phamotse tells the prime minister that if the appointment is not corrected, the society would be “left with no alternative but to institute legal proceedings to protect the interests of justice and uphold the rule of law in Lesotho”.
“We trust that you will accord this matter your highest priority and act decisively to avert further damage to the integrity of our governance structures.”
The Prime Minister’s spokesman, Thapelo Mabote, said they received the letter but Matekane had not yet read it yesterday.
Matekane is on leave and is expected back in the office on January 14.
Questions over the validity of his appointment come as Molelle is being haunted by the damaging audio clips that were leaked last week.
The clips were clandestinely recorded by Basotho National Party leader, Machesetsa Mofomobe.
In some of the clips, Molelle appears to be describing Matekane and his deputy Justice Nthomeng Majara as idiots. He also appears to be calling Law Minister Richard Ramoeletsi a devil.
In other clips, he seems to be discussing cases. thepost has not independently verified the authenticity of the audio clips.
Staff Reporter
MASERU
THE government has increased the salaries for traditional leaders by a massive 88.5 percent.
This means that a village chief not appointed by a gazette will now earn M3 001 a month, up from the previous salary of M1 592. That means village chiefs will now earn an extra M1 409 per month.
A village chief, or headman, appointed by a gazette has moved from M1 966 to M3 567 per month.
Above a village chief is one with jurisdiction over a small cluster of villages, a category three chief, who now moves from M3 768 to M5 181 per month.
A category four chief, known as ward chief, has moved from M4 455 per month to M7 993.
The category five chief, who reports directly to a principal chief, will now earn M10 674, up from M9 939 per month.
There is no increment for principal chiefs.
The government says the budget for chiefs’ salaries has moved from M129.4 million to M208.3 million annually.
The hike follows a series of discussions between the Lesotho Workers Association, representing the chiefs, and the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftainship.
The revised salaries will be implemented with effect from April 1, 2025.
According to the settlement agreement, a discussion about raising the lowest salary of M6 000 for the lowest-ranking chiefs will be revisited in October 2025.
Chiefs who spoke to thepost have expressed satisfaction with the hike, saying it will significantly improve their lives.
Chief Mopeli Matsoso of Ha-Tikoe in Maseru said his previous salary of M1 500 per month would now be doubled, which would improve his life and help provide smoother services to the community.
He stressed that they used to close the offices while going out looking for jobs to compensate for their little salaries.
“Now the people will get smoother services,” Chief Matsoso said.
“The offices will forever be open,” he said.
Chief Matsoso said the salary hike will also serve as a motivation for other chiefs.
Chief Tumo Majara of Liboping, Mokhethoaneng, also expressed his gratitude.
Chief Majara acknowledge the positive impact the salary review would have, especially as a new officeholder.
“I guess we are all happy, that review will help a lot,” he said.
The Principal Chief of Thaba-Bosiu, Khoabane Theko, said the salary increase of chief is a welcome move by the government.
“I’m yet to study how the new salary structure looks like. But I welcome it as a good move by the government,”Chief Theko said.
Nkheli Liphoto
MASERU
Motlatsi Maqelepo, the embattled Basotho Action Party (BAP) deputy leader and Tello Kibane, who was the party chairman, have rejected their suspension from the party arguing it was legally flawed.
The BAP’s central executive committee on Tuesday suspended Maqelepo for seven years and Kibane for five years. The suspensions became effective on the same day.
The party’s disciplinary committee which met last Wednesday had recommended an expulsion for the two but that decision was rejected with the committee pushing for a lengthy suspension.
Maqelepo’s suspension will end on January 7, 2032 while Kibane’s will run until January 7, 2030.
Their suspension letters from the BAP deputy secretary general Victoria Qheku, say they should not participate in any of the party’s activities.
“In effect, you are relieved of your responsibility as a CEC member and BAP deputy leader,” Maqelepo was told in the letter.
“You were found guilty by default on all charges and the committee recommended your immediate dismissal from the party,” the letter reads.
On Kibane, the verdict states that the committee decided to mitigate the recommended sanction by reducing his suspension to five years.
“In the gravity of the charges, the suspension affects your membership in the BAP parliamentary caucus from which you are removed as a chairman.”
They were suspended in absentia after they refused to attend the disciplinary hearing, which they said was illegal.
In response to the suspension, Maqelepo wrote a letter addressing the BAP members in general, defying the committee’s decision to suspend them.
He has called for a special conference, appealing to party constituencies to push for it, citing the ongoing internal fight that includes the leadership’s decision to withdraw the BAP from the coalition government.
Maqelepo also said the central executive committee is illegally in a campaign to dissolve committees in the constituencies and replace them with stooges.
He reminded the members that there is a court case pending in the High Court seeking an interdiction to charge them in the party’s structures without approval of the special conference that he is calling.
He said the party leadership should have awaited the outcome of the case before proceeding with any disciplinary action.
“The party that is led by a professor of law continues to do dismissals despite the issue being taken to the courts,” Maqelepo said.
The party leader, Professor Nqosa Mahao, is a distinguished professor of law.
Maqelepo said they would write the central executive committee rejecting its decision to suspend them, saying they will continue taking part in party activities.
He said their fate in the party is in the hands of the special conference.
He appealed to all the party constituencies to continue writing letters demanding the special conference.
Both Maqelepo and Kibane received letters on November 28 last year inviting them to show cause why they should not be suspended pending their hearing.
They both responded on the following day refusing to attend.
Maqelepo, Kibane, Hilda Van Rooyen, and ’Mamoipone Senauoane are accused of supporting a move to remove Professor Mahao from his ministerial position last year.
They were part of the BAP members who asked Prime Minister Sam Matekane to fire Professor Mahao, who at the same time was pushing for the reshuffling of Tankiso Phapano, the principal secretary for the Ministry of Energy.
When Matekane ignored Professor Mahao’s demands, the latter withdrew the BAP from the coalition government much to the fierce resistance of the party’s four MPs.
Maqelepo started touting members from constituencies to call for a special conference to reverse Professor Mahao and the central executive committee’s decision.
The central executive committee issued a circular stopping Maqelepo’s rallies but he continued, with the support of the other MPs.
In the BAP caucus of six MPs, it is only Professor Mahao and ’Manyaneso Taole who are supporting the withdrawal from the government.
Nkheli Liphoto
Knives out for Molelle
Massive salary hike for chiefs
Maqelepo says suspension deeply flawed
Initiation boys sexually molested
Battle for top DC post erupts
The ‘side job’ of sex work
Manyokole, ‘Bikerboy’ cleared of fraud charges
Four struck by lightining
Tempers boil over passports
Big questions for Molelle
Jackals are hunting
Pressing the Knorx Stereo
The mouth
Ramakongoana off to World Athletics Championships
Ramalefane request unsettles Matlama
Weekly Police Report
Reforms: time to change hearts and minds
The middle class have failed us
Coalition politics are bad for development
No peace plan, no economic recovery
Professionalising education
We have lost our moral indignation
Academic leadership, curriculum and pedagogy
Mokeki’s road to stardom
DCEO raids PS’
Literature and reality
Bringing the spark back to schools
The ABC blew its chance
I made Matekane rich: Moleleki
Musician dumps ABC
Bofuma, boimana li nts’a bana likolong
BNP infighting
Mahao o seboko ka ho phahama hoa litheko
Contract Farming Launch
7,5 Million Dollars For Needy Children
Ba ahileng lipuleng ba falle ha nakoana
Ba ahileng lipuleng ba falle ha nakoana
Weekly Police Report
Mahao o re masholu a e ts’oareloe
‘Our Members Voted RFP’ Says Metsing
SENATE OPENS
Matekane’s 100 Days Plan
High Profile Cases in Limbo
130 Law Students Graduate From NUL
Metsing and Mochoboroane Case Postponed
ADVERTISEMENT
Trending
-
News4 weeks ago
I have nothing to hide, says Lehlanya
-
Sports3 weeks ago
Likuena Faces Uphill Battle in CHAN Qualifiers
-
Business1 month ago
More US funding for development projects
-
News4 weeks ago
Winners set for Champions League
-
News1 week ago
Plight of refugees in Lesotho
-
Business4 weeks ago
Demystifying death benefit nomination
-
Business4 weeks ago
Take a Break from Summer
-
Business1 month ago
Breaking barriers to trade for women