Connect with us

News

Speaker digs in over Mokhothu

Published

on

MASERU – THE Speaker of Parliament Sephiri Motanyane and the Clerk of Parliament, Fine Maema, say while Mathibeli Mokhothu is the Leader of Opposition in Parliament he does not qualify for any benefits. In their heads of arguments on Tuesday they told the Constitutional Court that Mokhothu, who is the deputy leader of the Democratic Congress, “continues to hold title and office of the Leader of Opposition”.
They however say in terms of the Members of Parliament Salaries Act of 1998 he does not qualify for the benefits associated with the position of Leader of Opposition.

“Section 3 of the Salaries Act requires that the member must be the leader of a party or coalition that has at least 25 percent of the total membership of the National Assembly,” they argued in court papers. “Section 3 requires that any such coalition must be formed prior to the members taking their salaries,” they said.

Their argument is that after September 30 last year Mokhothu was no longer the leader of a party or coalition holding 25 percent of MPs.
“He accordingly no longer qualifies for the statutory benefits in the Salaries Act,” they said.

Mokhothu became Leader of Opposition in July last year after his DC party, the Popular Front for Democracy (PFD) and National Independent Party (NIP) wrote to Motanyane telling him that they had formed a coalition. The law provides that a coalition of parties may combine its seats in order to meet the requirements to nominate a leader to receive benefits and salary of the Leader of Opposition.

The Leader of Opposition is paid the same amount as a minister with other entitlements such as bodyguards, chauffeur, two domestic workers and a befitting government house. However, Motanyane and Maema argue that the coalition of three parties “must be formed prior to members taking their seats”.

They said the opposition coalition’s “attempt to form a coalition during the parliamentary term sought to avoid the requirement”.
“The purported coalition was invalid and could not be recognised when considering whether Hon. Mokhothu met the criteria in section 3 and qualified for the benefits in the Salaries Act,” they argued.

They only agree that Mokhothu is the Leader of Opposition for purposes of parliamentary business in accordance with parliament’s conventions, practices and precedents derived from the Westminster system of parliamentary government.
They also contend that he remains a member of the Council of State.
Mokhothu, together with opposition coalition parties, say it defies logic that one can be called Leader of Opposition and at the same time be denied benefits that go with the title.

They argue that Motanyane erred in November last year when he ruled in parliament that Mokhothu could not hold the position because his DC party does not have 25 percent of the seats. Their argument is that the coalition of DC, PFD and NIP has enough seats and under the constitution they qualify to nominate Mokhothu as the Leader of Opposition and become a member of the Council of State.

Their argument draws strength from section 95 (2) (h) of the constitution where it provides that the Council of State includes “two members of the National Assembly appointed by the Speaker from among the members of the opposition party or parties”.
“In making this appointment the Speaker shall appoint the leader of the opposition and the leader of the opposition party or coalition of parties having the next greatest numerical strength,” they argue.

They say Motanyane’s ruling that the coalition must be formed before members take their seats is novel. In their view, if Mokhothu qualifies to be a member of the Council of State by virtue of him being Leader of Opposition, then he is entitled to all benefits associated with the title.

Staff Reporter

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Police hunt former minister

Published

on

THE police have launched a hunt for former police minister, Lepota Sekola, who is suspected of involvement in stock theft.
Police want to arrest Sekola in connection with two cattle carcasses that were found at his grandfather’s funeral in Borokhoaneng three weeks ago.

During the initial interview, Sekola had insisted that the cows belonged to his late grandfather who had kept them in South Africa for better pastures.

The police didn’t arrest him at that time because investigations were still in the early stages. Further investigations have however led the police to believe that the animals were stolen from South Africa.

But when they were ready for the arrest, Sekola could not be found at his home or on his phone.

Police say Sekola will be charged with unlawful possession and illegal importation of two cows from South Africa.

The National Stock Theft Coordinator, Senior Superintendent Mapesela Klaass, told thepost last night that they “have completed investigations but he (Sekola) is nowhere to be seen”.

“We cannot get him on his mobile phones,” S/Supt Klaass said, adding that the police have been “visiting his home but he is not there”.

“His family members are aware that we are looking for him,” he said.

S/Supt Klaass said they are continuing with their search and as soon as they find him, they are going to drag him to the courts.

He said the police suspect the cows were brought from South Africa to be slaughtered for Sekola’s grandfather’s funeral.

Police sources told thepost that one of the cows had new branding while another had nothing. Both had holes on the ears that signalled that they used to have ear tags.

Majara Molupe

Continue Reading

News

Magistrate saves WILSA boss

Published

on

A Maseru magistrate, Nthabiseng Moopisa, this week stayed the criminal prosecution of Advocate ’Mamosa Mohlabula who is accused of tax evasion, money laundering and corruption.

In her application Advocate Mohlabula, who is the director of Women and Law in Southern Africa (WILSA), said the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) should not charge her pending finalisation of her tax evasion case.

Advocate Mohlabula is out on bail after she was formally charged with tax evasion in July last year.

She told Magistrate Moopisa that the DPP, Advocate Hlalefang Motinyane, was wrong to have agreed with the Director General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Offences (DCEO) to bring charges against her.

“In my viewpoint, the DCEO cannot be heard to charge me in relation to matters already seized with this Honourable Court,” she said in an affidavit.

She also said there is a pending civil case in the High Court in which the DCEO’s abuse of power is referenced, saying the precise way the case is handled will depend “on the way an alleged offence comes to the light”.

“Before that pending case is finalised, DCEO has no jurisdiction to detail me to court over isolated phenomenon of tax evasion and or over grievances of former employees of WILSA,” she said.
Advocate Mohlabula was charged together with the WILSA’s chief accounting officer.

She argued that it was WILSA that was being investigated, not individuals, further saying that was “a significant safeguard that the DCEO was impartial from an objective viewpoint”.

“To exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect the DCEO returned the items it seized from WILSA,” she said.

“This was a realistic and practical step towards administering justice and to avoid premature embarrassment to the management of WILSA.”

She said the Board of Trustees of WILSA were sent briefing notes which in certain respects reflected that the DCEO returned the properties of WILSA without warning them that they were suspects.

“In any event, we proceeded to fashion our arguments before the High Court. There was, and could be, no evidence to back up the decision of the DCEO to apply for the search warrant,” she said.

Advocate Mohlabula said before they took the matter to the High Court, she cooperated with the DCEO and it conducted an inquiry into the alleged crimes.

“Now that the matter is pending before the High Court, there is no more reason for the DCEO to remand me before the pending cases are finalised,” she said.

Staff Reporter

Continue Reading

News

Mphaka barred from ABC deputy’s race

Published

on

THE All Basotho Convention (ABC) has barred former Government Secretary Moahloli Mphaka and three others from contesting for the deputy leader’s position at an elective conference set for this week.
The three are Kefeletsoe Mojela, Katleho Molelle, and Lekhetho Mosito.

Mosito was an MP who was appointed Defence Minister for a day and removed the following day during Dr Moeketsi Majoro’s premiership.
The elective conference is set to be held at the Leqele High School hall this weekend.

A circular from the ABC said the three did not qualify to enter the race because they had not held any positions in the party’s committees.

The decision to bar the three is reminiscent of the same tactics that saw former leader Thomas Thabane block Professor Nqosa Mahao from contesting for the party’s deputy leader’s position.
Professor Mahao subsequently walked away and formed the Basotho Action Party (BAP).

A weakened ABC has never recovered from that split.

Mphaka and his colleagues were vying for the deputy leader’s position until they were stopped in their tracks by the circular which was issued out on Monday this week.
Dr Pinkie Manamolela is the current deputy leader.

She was plucked from the women’s league to replace Dr Majoro who had resigned from the national executive committee after losing the leadership race to Nkaku Kabi in 2022.

There is a high chance that the four could drag the ABC to court to assert their right to contest. The legal wrangles will likely destabilise the party that is still smarting from a thorough thrashing in general elections held in October 2022.

Mphaka this week told thepost that he will challenge the decision to block him in the courts of law.
“They are crazy people,” Mphaka said.

“I will not allow this to happen,” he said.

“I have already instructed my lawyers to launch an urgent application in the High Court to challenge the decision before Friday this week.”

He complained that it was not clear why the party had decided to kick him out of the race after he spent a lot of time and resources campaigning.

Mphaka said the national executive committee “usually allows members to contest for positions without considering whether they were ever in the constituency committees or not”.

The contenders in the race are former Water Minister Samonyane Ntsekele, ex-Police MP Lehlohonolo Moramotse, former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Leshoboro Mohlajoa, and Maseru Star Taxi Association member Sekhonyana Mosenene.

A member of the national executive committee told thepost that “many of us support Mphaka and Kefeletsoe at all costs”.

“We were dismayed when we saw the circular removing the duo from the race,” he said.

He said many ABC members were rallying behind Mphaka because “he has been campaigning even before everyone could start”.

“They know he has lots of followers.”

He said it is unfair that Mosenene has been allowed to run but he has never held any position in any constituency except that he represented his taxi association in the ABC national executive committee.
“Why has he been allowed to contest yet he is just like Mphaka and Kefeletsoe?”

He complained that Sekhonyana, while representing taxi operators in the committee, was eventually made the deputy party spokesman despite not being in any constituency committee after ’Matebatso Doti resigned from the position.

“Mphaka was chosen by the party to lead the 2022 elections campaign teams and develop a party manifesto,” he said.

“He was allowed to do all that without being involved in any party structures.”

The party’s spokesman Montoeli Masoetsa declined to comment.

Dr Manamolela told thepost that “the decision was not made by the party’s national executive committee”.

“I do not want to talk much …but it is not true that the party’s NEC decided to remove Mphaka and Kefeletsoe”.

Kabi could not be reached for comment.

Nkheli Liphoto

Continue Reading
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending